Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 400 of 610
1
...
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3991 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [mrsyj] by trimaster
Dec 26, 2007 (9:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 26, 2007 5:30 am)

Recall mentiones 2007 CTS, not new model. Toyota has had far more recalls than GM recently so I don't think a recall is cause for alarm with regards to GM quality. Everyone is recalling these days.
 
Just because "everyone" is recalling makes it OK for GM to have them also. Kinda reminds me of that old saying; if your friends jump off a bridge would you do it also?
 
Recalls for the 2007 model is NOT a good thing. That's the last year of the product cycle and they were still having problems with it? The logic is the 1st year or 2 of the new style has quality issues, and the last year should have all the kinks worked out. There's no excuse for the 2007 model to have any issues.
#3992 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [trimaster] by sls002
Dec 26, 2007 (9:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: trimaster (Dec 26, 2007 9:44 am)

A "recall" is bad publicity. However, they did not recall the 2004 models, which suggests that they changed something in 2005. The recall release says that more seals were failing than normal, which means that a certain number were expected to fail. My 2007 SRX is not leaking yet. I expect that it will be recalled.
 
I really do not think that this recall proves anything.
#3993 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [mrsyj] by trimaster
Dec 26, 2007 (9:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 26, 2007 5:28 am)

I had not seen C class sales data, you are correct about the C. I never said anything about the rest of MB's lineup however. The CTS still outsold the other cars I named. In november sales were up 55% to about 5500 units. MB's lineup continues to expand and its unsurprising that they continue to see record sales here in the US. They have 7 car lines and 3 truck lines and their sales reflect that. Cadillac has no competitor for the SLK, S class, CLK or CLS and that is part of the sales story.
 
Do U have any links to back up your sales claims?
 
Don't get me wrong, I LIKE the CTS. I think it's a great looking car. I see the car everywhere here in my area.
#3994 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [sls002] by trimaster
Dec 26, 2007 (10:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Dec 26, 2007 9:56 am)

A "recall" is bad publicity.
 
That's my point. GM doesn't need anymore bad publicity. Hopefully this won't sway buyers who are on the fence from buying a GM product.
#3995 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [trimaster] by mrsyj
Dec 26, 2007 (10:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: trimaster (Dec 26, 2007 9:44 am)

"Recalls for the 2007 model is NOT a good thing. That's the last year of the product cycle and they were still having problems with it? The logic is the 1st year or 2 of the new style has quality issues, and the last year should have all the kinks worked out. There's no excuse for the 2007 model to have any issues. "
 
Spare me. Most recalls these days are for issues that havent even caused any accidents. You're acting like the recall is for failed brakes. Again, Toyota has recalled more vehicles than GM in recent years but I doubt you would hesitate to purchase a Lexus. Recalls come from nearly every manufacturer in the US market, they are hardly unique to GM nor does GM lead the industry in recalls. Problems are not unique to 1st year vehicles and a quick look at CR's detailed results in their auto issue will comfirm that. Problems may decrease after the first year but they do not disappear. If that were the case all 3rd year vehicles would be 100% reliable across the board and that isnt the case.
#3996 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [trimaster] by mrsyj
Dec 26, 2007 (10:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: trimaster (Dec 26, 2007 10:01 am)

"That's my point. GM doesn't need anymore bad publicity. Hopefully this won't sway buyers who are on the fence from buying a GM product."
 
for those who really dont want a GM product any "bad news" will convince them to stay away while similar news from MB or Lexus would barely get their attention. I love it when people say foreign brands can "afford" to have bad quality news because they have such reputations. Bad news is bad news. Toyota has had numerous issues in recent years (some havent yet led to recalls) and yet there is no one calling for consumers to abandon them. I fail to see how its more tolerable for a company like Toyota or Mercedes to have declining quality just because they used to have top notch quality and yet people have so little patience with domestic products even though every reputable source says American quality continues to improve.
#3997 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [trimaster] by mrsyj
Dec 26, 2007 (10:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: trimaster (Dec 26, 2007 9:58 am)

"Do U have any links to back up your sales claims? "
 
Gm's sales data is available to anyone who wants to see it at http://media.gm.com:8221/us/gm/en/news/sales/index.html. Feel free to check it out for yourself. I saw G35 and Tl sales in press releases from their respective manufacturers at the beginning of the month. TL sales are down big time and G35 sales are up, but not exceeding CTS sales. In its best year I believe the CTS sold in excess of 50k units. I would be shocked if that record isnt broken next year.
#3998 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [mrsyj] by sls002
Dec 26, 2007 (10:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 26, 2007 10:17 am)

This GM recall is in part a result of the failure causing an accident. I would have thought that the driver would have noticed something amiss before the rear axle locked up though.
#3999 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [mrsyj] by laurasdada
Dec 26, 2007 (11:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 26, 2007 10:25 am)

The original CTS did sell well, good for Caddy. I would hope the new one would sell as well, probably better as in my eyes it is a big improvement and I'll consider it in my next round of car shopping. I'm a reforming GM-hater... The only reason I disliked GM (besides the personal experience and friend's experience with unacceptable reliability/quality issues ) was my perception of the arrogance that they could keep putting out the same sub-standard cars year after year when I felt that the largest car company in the world certainly had the talent to build a better car. Finally, as of late, it appears that they are...
 
Note that the TL (my current ride) for '08 will be in its 5th model year and is to be replaced in '09. So, sales decline is no great surprise.
#4000 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [laurasdada] by sls002
Dec 26, 2007 (11:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: laurasdada (Dec 26, 2007 11:11 am)

I think GM is doing a good job on making the quality where it should be. However, I think that in terms of materials, the interiors could be better, particularly Cadillacs. The CTS (which I have only seen in pictures) is probably OK. But the higher end models could be better.

Messages Page 400 of 610
1
...
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement