Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 395 of 610
1
...
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3940 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [trimaster] by sls002
Dec 21, 2007 (7:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: trimaster (Dec 20, 2007 8:24 pm)

it is a lexus camry
#3941 of 6098
Re: WSJ article Dec 21 on CTS [xrunner2] by fintail
Dec 21, 2007 (8:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: xrunner2 (Dec 21, 2007 7:29 am)

I haven't seen it in person, but isn't the CTS Nav display very much like that of the C-class? I've seen the new C Nav in person, and it's pretty slick...the CTS looked very similar in the pics I saw.
#3942 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [trimaster] by mrsyj
Dec 21, 2007 (10:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: trimaster (Dec 20, 2007 8:24 pm)

"Objective reason? "
 
CTS has more space and a superior interior to C or A4 and has more power than both. I cant think of one good reason to buy a C or A4 over the 2008 CTS. Not to mention it looks better and has more space. Can you think of any good reasons not to get the CTS? I find the C class interior to be very bland and too plasticky for my tastes. The CTS is much warmer and has details such as a stitched dashboard that you wont find on the C class.
#3943 of 6098
Re: Cadillac V-Series........... [sls002] by mrsyj
Dec 21, 2007 (10:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Dec 21, 2007 7:54 am)

"As far as the CTS's handling goes, Road and Track does not think it is nearly in the 5-series class. Both the 3-series and 5-series can do 0.9 G's on a skidpad. "
 
I havent read any review that stated the CTS isnt close to the 3 or 5 in handling. The CTS pulled .89gs in Motor Trend which is very close to .9gs. R&T compared the CTS to G35 and had very little negative to say about the CTS even though it came in 2nd. The CTS' handling is world class, it posted a higher lane change speed than the 328i in the recent C&D comparo. That is very impressive when you consider the CTS weighs about 500lbs more than the BMW.
#3944 of 6098
Re: Cadillac V-Series........... [mrsyj] by sls002
Dec 21, 2007 (12:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 21, 2007 10:34 am)

nearly as good is not the same thing as better than....
#3945 of 6098
Re: Cadillac V-Series........... [sls002] by mrsyj
Dec 21, 2007 (12:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Dec 21, 2007 12:03 pm)

who said "better than"? you cant make a car that handles better than BMW because they are the top of that category. How do you exceed excellent? you can't in this case. The Cadillac is as capable as the 3 and 5 and that was my point. furthermore it has a better interior than either and is far cheaper than the 5 and has better dealer satisfaction scores. I'll take the CTS any day.
 
In real world driving this is all moot anyway so it doesnt matter that the 3 series can pull .02gs more than the CTS. The buyers wont know and if it wasnt for precise testing the auto reviewers woudlnt even know. On top of that the CTS has outbraked its competition in every comparo I have seen. Apparently you can beat BMW in some things.
#3946 of 6098
Re: Cadillac V-Series........... [mrsyj] by sls002
Dec 21, 2007 (12:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 21, 2007 12:19 pm)

Road & Track got 0.86 G's with the CTS, while the Infinity G35 did 0.88 and the 535i was 0.91. I might have expected you to comment on the difference in tyres, where the CTS is running 50 series tyres, which should be somewhat better on real world highways, and the others are using 40 (or so) series. I think BMW's ride and handling could be exceeded, but only at some cost and with better tires. For the CTS to exceed BMW's ride and handling would require some additional refinement of the suspension too.
 
I am not saying that I think Cadillac's are bad, but I am saying that they are not top dog.
 
Car & Driver's comparison puts the CTS at 0.87, while the 3-series is 0.90 and the infinity is 0.89. This could mean that the R&T 5-series would have been at 0.92. In any case the CTS seems to be third rate, not second best.
 
In a separate test (so comparing may not be valid), the Lexus IS F (C&D) got 0.92 G's, which may match the 5-series.
#3947 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [mrsyj] by habitat1
Dec 21, 2007 (2:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 21, 2007 10:31 am)

Not to mention it looks better
 
Perhaps if you are into chrome grills and Rock em Sock em Robot exterior lines. It's still ugly GM on the outside to me. Let's just say that looks are subjective and some have a taste for GM styling and others don't.
 
#3948 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [habitat1] by sls002
Dec 21, 2007 (2:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: habitat1 (Dec 21, 2007 2:12 pm)

Styling is subjective, as is ride and handling. Skidpad numbers do not translate into handling on real roads. I would say that the CTS looks better than the Aztec did, and I think better than the 80 Seville. BMW's styling has (of late) not been great either (7-series was worst). Audi has a big grill too.
 
Perhaps the 59 Cadillac's could make a comeback eldo
#3949 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [mrsyj] by trimaster
Dec 21, 2007 (10:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 21, 2007 10:31 am)

Can you think of any good reasons not to get the CTS?
 
You're looking at it from a logical point of view. Not only that, you almost come off as saying the CTS is the perfect car...lol With that said, some people ask the same question about cars like the Camry or Accord. They will say those are the prefect cars for a lot less money. Do we really need all the extras? No, we want them.
 
But there will be plenty people who WILL choose a Merc C-Class over the Caddy CTS for many reasons:
 
1. It's a Benz. Not everyone is excited or impressed that Caddy has had a good year or 2. past reviews weren't favorable to the car.
 
2. Caddy doesn't have that image or wow factor that Mercedes has yet. They used to, but that was years ago.
 
3. You think the Caddy looks better then the Mercedes. Not everyone does.
 
4. The Caddy is too big. Some people do prefer smaller cars.
 
5. It's made by General Motors. There are many people who will NEVER buy an American car again.
 
6. Price. The Caddy CTS reviewed ( $44,715) costs more then the Mercedes C350 tested ($41,935.) Price is a big factor for some, especially when the standard model is $32-$34k. Some may say if I have to put another 10 grand into it I my as well get a Benz. Why? See #s 1 & 2 above...
 
7. Higher fuel economy? It wouldn't be a factor to me, but some people really look at those things. The Benz was 20.6, Caddy was 18.3 combined
 
8. The 2008 CTS is completely redesigned. Many people are leery of buying the 1st year new model. They have a wait & see approach...
 
9. Demographics. Here in Florida, I see people in their 50's and above driving the CTS. I see people 15-20 years younger driving the C Class. Is it like that everywhere? I have no clue, but that's what I see in my area. I see the CTS everywhere. It's a VERY popular car.
 
I think the CTS is a nice car. I'm glad GM has a potential winner on their hands. Yes it has good reviews, but it all comes down to sales. Hopefully it does well.

Messages Page 395 of 610
1
...
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement