Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 395 of 611
1
...
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
...
611
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3937 of 6098
Re: Cadillac V-Series........... [habitat1] by rockylee
Dec 20, 2007 (9:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: habitat1 (Dec 20, 2007 3:15 am)

Rocky, I will give the best GM can serve up a test drive.
 
I do want you to give the CTS-V a try habitat1
 
-Rocky
#3938 of 6098
WSJ article Dec 21 on CTS by xrunner2
Dec 21, 2007 (7:29 am)
Reply
Dec 21 edition of WSJ has an article on the 08 CTS. It mentions that CTS was Motor Trend’s car of the year. It has a table listing specs of CTS, G35, Lexus GS and 5 Series.
 
The writer, Jeff Sabatini said that CTS is now a legitimate competitor to any sub $50K sedan on the market. Other items in the article:
 
“Inside, the improvements are more revolutionary, starting with a wholesale upgrade of the materials and design. The crowning achievement is an elegant implementation of the navigation-system display….If anything can cause the German auto makers to feel shame for their maladroit efforts at integrating navigation screens, the CTS can. Cadillac has clearly set the industry standard.”
 
“Staking a place amid the crowded field of rear-wheel drive luxury sedans with sporting pretensions is a tricky business, but Cadillac has positioned the new CTS almost perfectly to maximize its marketability. Like the old CTS, the new one is roughly the size of the BMW 5-Series but priced closer to the smaller BMW 3-Series. It’s flashier than a Mercedes C-Class, more fun to drive than any Lexus and more comfortable than either BMW.”
 
“….what really impresses about the CTS is that it captures GM doing two things for which it historically has shown little capacity. The first is continuing to improve a product over successive generations; the second is paying attention to details. Both practices will be far more important to the company’s long-term success than the fleeting acclaim of this single model.”
#3939 of 6098
Re: Cadillac V-Series........... [mrsyj] by sls002
Dec 21, 2007 (7:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 20, 2007 12:47 pm)

My SRX's (a 2007) interior is OK, but for the money I think it could have been, and should have been, better. But it is a utility vehicle, so perhaps it is more or less what it ought to be. I would expect the STS interior to be much nicer. The CTS is probably OK.
 
As far as the CTS's handling goes, Road and Track does not think it is nearly in the 5-series class. Both the 3-series and 5-series can do 0.9 G's on a skidpad.
#3940 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [trimaster] by sls002
Dec 21, 2007 (7:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: trimaster (Dec 20, 2007 8:24 pm)

it is a lexus camry
#3941 of 6098
Re: WSJ article Dec 21 on CTS [xrunner2] by fintail
Dec 21, 2007 (8:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: xrunner2 (Dec 21, 2007 7:29 am)

I haven't seen it in person, but isn't the CTS Nav display very much like that of the C-class? I've seen the new C Nav in person, and it's pretty slick...the CTS looked very similar in the pics I saw.
#3942 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [trimaster] by mrsyj
Dec 21, 2007 (10:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: trimaster (Dec 20, 2007 8:24 pm)

"Objective reason? "
 
CTS has more space and a superior interior to C or A4 and has more power than both. I cant think of one good reason to buy a C or A4 over the 2008 CTS. Not to mention it looks better and has more space. Can you think of any good reasons not to get the CTS? I find the C class interior to be very bland and too plasticky for my tastes. The CTS is much warmer and has details such as a stitched dashboard that you wont find on the C class.
#3943 of 6098
Re: Cadillac V-Series........... [sls002] by mrsyj
Dec 21, 2007 (10:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Dec 21, 2007 7:54 am)

"As far as the CTS's handling goes, Road and Track does not think it is nearly in the 5-series class. Both the 3-series and 5-series can do 0.9 G's on a skidpad. "
 
I havent read any review that stated the CTS isnt close to the 3 or 5 in handling. The CTS pulled .89gs in Motor Trend which is very close to .9gs. R&T compared the CTS to G35 and had very little negative to say about the CTS even though it came in 2nd. The CTS' handling is world class, it posted a higher lane change speed than the 328i in the recent C&D comparo. That is very impressive when you consider the CTS weighs about 500lbs more than the BMW.
#3944 of 6098
Re: Cadillac V-Series........... [mrsyj] by sls002
Dec 21, 2007 (12:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 21, 2007 10:34 am)

nearly as good is not the same thing as better than....
#3945 of 6098
Re: Cadillac V-Series........... [sls002] by mrsyj
Dec 21, 2007 (12:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Dec 21, 2007 12:03 pm)

who said "better than"? you cant make a car that handles better than BMW because they are the top of that category. How do you exceed excellent? you can't in this case. The Cadillac is as capable as the 3 and 5 and that was my point. furthermore it has a better interior than either and is far cheaper than the 5 and has better dealer satisfaction scores. I'll take the CTS any day.
 
In real world driving this is all moot anyway so it doesnt matter that the 3 series can pull .02gs more than the CTS. The buyers wont know and if it wasnt for precise testing the auto reviewers woudlnt even know. On top of that the CTS has outbraked its competition in every comparo I have seen. Apparently you can beat BMW in some things.
#3946 of 6098
Re: Cadillac V-Series........... [mrsyj] by sls002
Dec 21, 2007 (12:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 21, 2007 12:19 pm)

Road & Track got 0.86 G's with the CTS, while the Infinity G35 did 0.88 and the 535i was 0.91. I might have expected you to comment on the difference in tyres, where the CTS is running 50 series tyres, which should be somewhat better on real world highways, and the others are using 40 (or so) series. I think BMW's ride and handling could be exceeded, but only at some cost and with better tires. For the CTS to exceed BMW's ride and handling would require some additional refinement of the suspension too.
 
I am not saying that I think Cadillac's are bad, but I am saying that they are not top dog.
 
Car & Driver's comparison puts the CTS at 0.87, while the 3-series is 0.90 and the infinity is 0.89. This could mean that the R&T 5-series would have been at 0.92. In any case the CTS seems to be third rate, not second best.
 
In a separate test (so comparing may not be valid), the Lexus IS F (C&D) got 0.92 G's, which may match the 5-series.

Messages Page 395 of 611
1
...
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
...
611
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement