You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?
5919 messages, Last post on Apr 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: sls002 (Nov 12, 2007 9:38 am) = = = While I agree with statements 1 & 2, I disagree with #3. If Caddy does build something unique & American, I think that they CAN sell it. Particularly if the Price is Right. Even if expensive. I look to Chevy. The Corvette ( full disclosure here: I drive a 2007 Coupe ) is rather expensive, compared to most other Chevys. Yet they sell in volumes that allow GM to 1) make a profit & 2) make a GM ‘flagship’. The XLR sells in very low volumes, true enough. Yet sharing parts & platform with the Corvette allows the XLR to survive. And the XLR-v. ( And I applaud Caddy for investing the time & $$s in all the ‘v-series’ cars. ) I happen to disagree with a couple of aspects of Caddy’s approach \ direction in all but the CTS-v, however. My sense is that the ( very expensive ) STS-v and XLR-v are priced largely according to the very sophisticated and expensive powerplants under their hoods. STS-v for 2008 = approx. $76K and the XLR-v is over $97K. My opinion is that both the STS-v and the XLR-v could have been equipped with a larger, normally aspirated, simpler & cheaper motor – and would have sold much better. If they had been equipped with ( for example ) the 6.2L V8, from the 2008 Corvette – or even the 400 HP 6.0L V8 ( with 400\400 HP\TQ ) instead of the supercharged NorthStar, they would likely have had very similar acceleration and been a whole lot less expensive to develop & to produce. And to sell. That would clearly have been a large ‘step up’ from the NorthStar – at 320 \ 315 HP\TQ, and now offering barely improved acceleration compared to the new 300+ HP DI V6 available in the 2008 STS. The XLR-v, with the s/c NorthStar posts almost identical acceleration numbers to my 2007 Corvette w/automatic. (The automatic trans. is essentially identical in both cars.) For nearly $100 Grand. Though this lovely ( and expensive ) 4.4L s/c motor makes more HP and marginally more TQ than the 6.0L V8 in the Corvette, they are so close in acceleration largely due to the XLR-v’s much greater weight – 3800#+ vs the Corvette at close to 3200#. The STS-v with 469 HP and 439 TQ is a 13.2 second sedan, according to R&T’s test. I’d bet that with the current Corvette’s 430 HP & 424 TQ would be capable of a mid- to high 13 second quarter. And would feel ‘just as quick’ and \ or ‘just as fast’ to 90+% of potential buyers. And it might very well also even feel ‘more American’ than the s/c NorthStar. And these cars could then have been marketed at something like a ( clearly, I am guessing here ) $10K or more ‘discount’, compared to those ‘-v’ cars actual MSRPs. I think an STS-v at closer to $63K or $64K would have been much more likely to develop into a sales success for Caddy. At almost $75K to start, the STS-v pricing makes for difficult volume sales – even for a Caddy. Note that $63K - $64K qualifies as “very expensive”, to me. But I believe that Caddy ** COULD ** sell the STS-v in significantly higher volumes at this MSRP \ Price Point. Said another way, if GM had decided to ‘pull ahead’ development of the 6.2L V8, instead of developing that s/c & hand-built version of the NorthStar, and plug the n/a 6.2L V8 into the STS-v at launch – and the Corvette a year later, perhaps – this would have been far better received. And would have sold better. Again, I mean no disrespect to the NorthStar motor. GM’s continued development of “regular” V8s strongly suggests to me that this would have been a better, as well as cheaper, route to an STS-v and an XLR-v. And partly here again I am considering that “different, but American” aspect. And I suspect that the 6.2L V8 is actually cheaper to produce than the base, 4.6L n/a NorthStar V8 – whereas the s/c NorthStar is clearly MUCH more expensive. Thus, an STS-v with the 6.2L V8 and 1SG level of equipment, plus a few unique touches, could probably be sold at a very modest ‘markup’ over a ‘regular’, NorthStar 1SG. Currently priced at roughly $61K MSRP. The same would apply to the XLR-v. And I will reiterate here that I would really, REALLY like to see Caddy succeed – and establish itself as a top tier Luxury Sports Brand. The 2008 CTS appears to be a large step in the right direction, though we’ll see where sales are after 6 to 9 months or a year on the market. Just my 0.02 gallons worth . . . I could be wrong. Cheers, - Ray Considering the Corvette, with top option group, to be nearly as much a luxury GT car as the XLR, for much less money and featuring better acceleration ( highly American ) to boot . . .
|
|
|
Replying to: 62vetteefp (Nov 12, 2007 11:17 am) |
|
|
Replying to: rayainsw (Nov 12, 2007 11:30 am) However, putting the pushrod engines in the higher end Cadillac's to make V-series performance sedans is not what the market wants - it may be what you want, but you should buy the Pontiac G8. The true luxury performance sedan market is expecting refinement more like the AMG Mercedes models - the 6.2 liter V8.
|
|
|
Replying to: 62vetteefp (Nov 12, 2007 11:17 am) The truth of the matter is, you are not going to bring a current BMW or Mercedes owner over to Cadillac. Those people have drunk the Germans kool-aid, and aren't gonna change. Unless their portfolios tank. The people you CAN influence are the ones who are moving up from mass market cars, who maybe cannot afford a Bimmer or Benz, or lux buyers from other brands with less pedigree. Lexus, Audi, Infiniti, Volvo, SAAB(throwing that in for Rocky, even though they don't really belong).
|
|
|
Replying to: volvomax (Nov 12, 2007 1:14 pm) As far as Saab, goes they are getting better but would agree their is work that still needs to be done. -Rocky
|
|
|
Replying to: volvomax (Nov 12, 2007 1:14 pm) However, I'll admit that it'll probably be harder for the loyal German owners to switch since they have been under German kool-aid poisoning for a long time. It'll be much easier for the younger buyers with less experience to consider Caddy because they simply have less to compare to. That's why I think the most important thing Caddy needs right now is a successful entry level program that can rival BMW's 3-series. Get them while they are young and dont let go.
|
|
|
Replying to: rockylee (Nov 12, 2007 1:35 pm) Oh puh-leez. Yes, Cadillac may be more reliable, yes it is certainly cheaper. But, you have ALOT to learn about what motivates,or de-motiavtes car buyers. Esp luxury ones. Lux cars are bough primarily on image and cachet. Cadillac's image is well below the Germans. It just is.
|
|
|
Replying to: volvomax (Nov 12, 2007 3:34 pm) Well not on the entry-level (CTS) and on the Truck/SUV (Escalade) Still even to this day people will still use the phrase that........ is the "Cadillac" of ..........! -Rocky
|
|
|
I had my Seville STS at the Cadillac dealer for an oil change this morning. The CTS is RED HOT! I was eyeing up a leftover black 2007 DTS Performance, but I didn't give in to temptation. |
|
|
Replying to: rockylee (Nov 12, 2007 4:42 pm) I always said that the LS 600hL is the Cadillac of Lexus.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Cadillac Escalade
2009 Cadillac XLR
2009 Cadillac STS



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats