Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 358 of 611
1
...
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
...
611
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3564 of 6098
Re: V8 ? Re: CTS marketing [rayainsw] by sls002
Sep 21, 2007 (8:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: rayainsw (Sep 21, 2007 8:19 am)

The body is now as wide as the S series (STS, SRX) which do have the V8. The direct injection 3.6 performance is comparable to the 335. Automobile's comparison test shows the 335 quicker to 60 and through the 1/4 mile. I think that a V8 will not become available in the basic CTS while the STS is still in production. The CTS_V will get a V8, but what V8 is not clear. I would think the supercharged northstar would fit.
#3565 of 6098
Re: Meh [rayainsw] by anythngbutgm
Sep 21, 2007 (8:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: rayainsw (Sep 21, 2007 8:30 am)

Can't access it since I'm not a member but there is a locked thread on C&G on this. I stumbled on that this morning.
 
2009 CTS-V slated for late Sept '08 arrival; no Tremac trans
#3566 of 6098
3.6 performance Re: V8 ? Re: CTS marketing [sls002] by rayainsw
Sep 21, 2007 (9:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Sep 21, 2007 8:44 am)

Performance ‘comparable’?? I suppose, but:
 
Well, with a curb weight closer to 3600 than 4000, and a ( um, somewhat underrated ) 300 \ 300 ( vs 304 \ 272 ) the BMW 335 acceleration has proven what I’d call significantly quicker in independent, published tests.
 
The C+D test of a manual trans. 2008 CTS shows times nearly a second longer than the 335 to 60, and over a second less quick ( at almost 10 MPH slower terminal velocity ) in the Quarter Mile.
 
IMHO, a difference of a half second or less might mean that they were comparable. Clearly no number ( or set of numbers ) completely describes any car – and acceleration is only one quantifiable aspect of ‘performance’ but the acceleration results strongly suggest to me that the 335 would feel much quicker, in typical street driving. Stepping out of a 2007 Corvette ( my Daily Driver ) and into the 335, I was very pleasantly surprised at the ‘thrust’ available from the TT I6. Even with another 175+ ( guess ) pounds of ‘ballast’ added by the BMW sales dweeb during my test drive.
 
Again, does not mean that the 335 & CTS are not comparable, overall – just in my opinion, the acceleration aspect is not very close. I can see other areas where they are more nearly comparable.
- Ray
 
Sources:
 
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtests/13548/tested-2007-bmw-335i-coupe-automatic- - - -performance-payoffs-page3.html
 
0 – 60 = 4.9
Quarter = 13.4 106
( That’s with the six speed automatic = slightly quicker results than their test with the six speed manual trans. )
 
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtests/13537/full-test-2008-cadillac-cts.html
 
0 – 60 = 5.8
Quarter = 14.6 97
#3567 of 6098
Re: Dirt cheap DTS [anythngbutgm] by fintail
Sep 21, 2007 (9:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: anythngbutgm (Sep 21, 2007 8:22 am)

DTS are a used bargain, I see them (06s) even cheaper than that around here. Lots of bang for the buck when they are 12-18 months old.
 
That Eldo is probably only about 4x market value.
#3568 of 6098
Re: 3.6 performance Re: V8 ? Re: CTS marketing [rayainsw] by sls002
Sep 21, 2007 (3:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rayainsw (Sep 21, 2007 9:43 am)

My point of view is that my 95 Riviera with the supercharged engine had more than adequate performance for normal day to day driving. It would do 0-60 in 8 seconds and the quarter mile in 16 with the end speed at 90 MPH. My SRX will do better than that, although I really see little obvious difference in normal driving.
 
The CTS has excellent performance with either engine. BMW has been forced into turbocharging to keep up with the competition, as they can't fit a longer inline six without moving the firewall back into the passenger compartment and moving the rear passengers into the trunk.
#3569 of 6098
Re: 3.6 performance Re: V8 ? Re: CTS marketing [sls002] by plekto
Sep 21, 2007 (8:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Sep 21, 2007 3:10 pm)

From what I have read, the 2009 CTS-V will have a *500*HP engine. Silly power levels for the insane.
#3570 of 6098
Re: 3.6 performance Re: V8 ? Re: CTS marketing [plekto] by rockylee
Sep 21, 2007 (8:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Sep 21, 2007 8:46 pm)

It however could be as high as 600 hp. !!!!
 
-Rocky
#3571 of 6098
Power and performance by sls002
Sep 22, 2007 (8:13 am)
Reply
Motor Trend seems to think the new CTS-V will get a 600 hp version of the Corvette engine.
 
What BMW has done by turbocharging the 335's six it to bump the entry level sports sedan performance benchmark to a new level. GM's turbocharged engines have a very flat torque curve which means that performance does not depend on the engine being kept in a particular speed range. BMW's 335 has 300+ lb-ft of torque and will out perform any engine with less torque.
 
The DI 3.6 in the CTS will compete well with the rest of the competition, but is overpowered by BMW's turbo engine. Even the 4.6 northstar does not have enough torque to out perform the 335. I think Cadillac (and the rest of the entry level sports sedans) will have to turbo charge some version of the DOHC V6 line (a bigger version of the turbo 2.8) to be on the same performance level as BMW.
#3572 of 6098
Re: Power and performance [sls002] by plekto
Sep 22, 2007 (10:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Sep 22, 2007 8:13 am)

But let's see.. turbo=money and things to break, plus lag(which the 3.6 is designed to not have, with a silly low torque curve).
 
GM's opn the right track then it comes to beefing up power with its love of superchargers. Now a supercharged 3.6DI with 400HP... I'd rather have that than a CTS-V for driving around town(600 is just too much, really)
#3573 of 6098
Re: Dirt cheap DTS [fintail] by cooterbfd
Sep 22, 2007 (2:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Sep 21, 2007 9:59 am)

Don't forget, the DTS could be a "stripper" rental, as well.
 
My money's on the Eldo being a convertible. They made convertibles from '82-'85 (Riv's as well)

Messages Page 358 of 611
1
...
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
...
611
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement