Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 357 of 610
1
...
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3559 of 6098
CTS marketing by sls002
Sep 21, 2007 (6:26 am)
Reply
Cadillac has positioned the CTS as an entry level sports sedan. I do not think that they can turn around in a year or two, and make it a luxury sports sedan. In the event that they dump the STS, then an upgraded CTS might move somewhat up market. To do that I think the interior would need some improvement, a bit more wood trim, less bright metal. However, more of the STS's equipment would need to be available, like the adaptive cruise control and a V8 engine.
#3560 of 6098
V8 ? Re: CTS marketing [sls002] by rayainsw
Sep 21, 2007 (8:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Sep 21, 2007 6:26 am)

“However, more of the STS's equipment would need to be available, like the adaptive cruise control and a V8 engine.”
 
You raise a question that I have been meaning to ask here:
 
Has anyone heard if the CTS’s “platform” was engineered to accept a V8?
Edit:
A ‘regular’ CTS – it appears a given that there will be a CTS-v – with a V8.
 
I happened to drive a BMW 335 sedan a few weeks ago – and had planned to drive a 2008 CTS immediately after. The acceleration ( TQ ) of the 335 convinced me that driving a CTS right then would be ( um ) unfair to the CTS.
 
But a V8 with 350 \ 350 ( HP \ TQ ) or more would put the CTS in a different ( acceleration ) class – and might allow legitimate acceleration comparison with a 335 or 535. . .
 
Anyone heard?
Speculation?
 
Thanks,
- Ray
Finding no answer with a couple of Google searches . . .
#3561 of 6098
Dirt cheap DTS by anythngbutgm
Sep 21, 2007 (8:22 am)
Reply
link title
 
What was this sucker, like 50 grand new?
 
And for the collectors (No pics)
 
link title
#3562 of 6098
Meh by anythngbutgm
Sep 21, 2007 (8:24 am)
Reply
"But a V8 with 350 \ 350 ( HP \ TQ ) or more would put the CTS in a different ( acceleration ) class – and might allow legitimate acceleration comparison with a 335 or 535. . ."
 
Without a stickshift available for this model, they might as well tack on a Landau roof and curb feelers.
#3563 of 6098
Re: Meh [anythngbutgm] by rayainsw
Sep 21, 2007 (8:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: anythngbutgm (Sep 21, 2007 8:24 am)

"Without a stickshift available for this model, they might as well tack on a Landau roof and curb feelers. "
 
The current CTS-v iteration ( only ) comes with a manual trans.
So – there certainly seems to be a possibility that we will see another. . .
- Ray
Happy for those who prefer a manual to have that choice . . .
#3564 of 6098
Re: V8 ? Re: CTS marketing [rayainsw] by sls002
Sep 21, 2007 (8:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: rayainsw (Sep 21, 2007 8:19 am)

The body is now as wide as the S series (STS, SRX) which do have the V8. The direct injection 3.6 performance is comparable to the 335. Automobile's comparison test shows the 335 quicker to 60 and through the 1/4 mile. I think that a V8 will not become available in the basic CTS while the STS is still in production. The CTS_V will get a V8, but what V8 is not clear. I would think the supercharged northstar would fit.
#3565 of 6098
Re: Meh [rayainsw] by anythngbutgm
Sep 21, 2007 (8:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: rayainsw (Sep 21, 2007 8:30 am)

Can't access it since I'm not a member but there is a locked thread on C&G on this. I stumbled on that this morning.
 
2009 CTS-V slated for late Sept '08 arrival; no Tremac trans
#3566 of 6098
3.6 performance Re: V8 ? Re: CTS marketing [sls002] by rayainsw
Sep 21, 2007 (9:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Sep 21, 2007 8:44 am)

Performance ‘comparable’?? I suppose, but:
 
Well, with a curb weight closer to 3600 than 4000, and a ( um, somewhat underrated ) 300 \ 300 ( vs 304 \ 272 ) the BMW 335 acceleration has proven what I’d call significantly quicker in independent, published tests.
 
The C+D test of a manual trans. 2008 CTS shows times nearly a second longer than the 335 to 60, and over a second less quick ( at almost 10 MPH slower terminal velocity ) in the Quarter Mile.
 
IMHO, a difference of a half second or less might mean that they were comparable. Clearly no number ( or set of numbers ) completely describes any car – and acceleration is only one quantifiable aspect of ‘performance’ but the acceleration results strongly suggest to me that the 335 would feel much quicker, in typical street driving. Stepping out of a 2007 Corvette ( my Daily Driver ) and into the 335, I was very pleasantly surprised at the ‘thrust’ available from the TT I6. Even with another 175+ ( guess ) pounds of ‘ballast’ added by the BMW sales dweeb during my test drive.
 
Again, does not mean that the 335 & CTS are not comparable, overall – just in my opinion, the acceleration aspect is not very close. I can see other areas where they are more nearly comparable.
- Ray
 
Sources:
 
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtests/13548/tested-2007-bmw-335i-coupe-automatic- - - -performance-payoffs-page3.html
 
0 – 60 = 4.9
Quarter = 13.4 106
( That’s with the six speed automatic = slightly quicker results than their test with the six speed manual trans. )
 
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtests/13537/full-test-2008-cadillac-cts.html
 
0 – 60 = 5.8
Quarter = 14.6 97
#3567 of 6098
Re: Dirt cheap DTS [anythngbutgm] by fintail
Sep 21, 2007 (9:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: anythngbutgm (Sep 21, 2007 8:22 am)

DTS are a used bargain, I see them (06s) even cheaper than that around here. Lots of bang for the buck when they are 12-18 months old.
 
That Eldo is probably only about 4x market value.
#3568 of 6098
Re: 3.6 performance Re: V8 ? Re: CTS marketing [rayainsw] by sls002
Sep 21, 2007 (3:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rayainsw (Sep 21, 2007 9:43 am)

My point of view is that my 95 Riviera with the supercharged engine had more than adequate performance for normal day to day driving. It would do 0-60 in 8 seconds and the quarter mile in 16 with the end speed at 90 MPH. My SRX will do better than that, although I really see little obvious difference in normal driving.
 
The CTS has excellent performance with either engine. BMW has been forced into turbocharging to keep up with the competition, as they can't fit a longer inline six without moving the firewall back into the passenger compartment and moving the rear passengers into the trunk.

Messages Page 357 of 610
1
...
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement