Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 271 of 610
1
...
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2701 of 6098
Re: Well.. [andres3] by gagrice
Apr 09, 2007 (9:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: andres3 (Apr 09, 2007 9:01 am)

You are very lucky. I have receipts for about $18k in repairs and maintenance on our LS400 and it only has 88K miles. I won't even bother you with the horror stories on the 1964 Toyota LC, 1978 Honda Accord and 1995 Toyota PU truck. I'll take my GM domestics any day of the week. You would think with all these GM bashers we would get one that had a Cadillac that caused them problems in the last 5 years. Not their aunts 3rd cousin removed that was married to their sister.
#2702 of 6098
Re: History gives us a clue [rockylee] by andres3
Apr 09, 2007 (9:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: rockylee (Apr 07, 2007 10:57 am)

I agree....It's like buying a electronic device or an appliance. If the company stands behind it that means it must be good.
 
I'd agree to a certain point. If a company has historically for a long period of time stood behind it's product then it means it must be good. Since GM has only recently offered a "decent" warranty (the bumper to bumper coverage still sucks, for lack of a better word) then its really just a marketing gimmick.
 
Wait 10 years from now and see if the warranty remains the same.
#2703 of 6098
The past by imidazol97
Apr 09, 2007 (9:15 am)
Reply
Too often is only of Cadillac and GM's past.
 
Let's have people post about Hondas and Toyotas from their first years here. I can start with the 70s, early 80s model a buddy had in Charleston with CVCC that required premium, quit running if you hit water on the road in rain, showed rusting real fast, jumped to the next lane when you accelerated quickly in a lower gear due to torque steer.
 
Sometimes our views are tunneled without the broad view that lots of these cars had problems. Even today I can list a bunch of Camry discussions with _lots_ of problems, right here,now, on Edmunds, live. A couple-a-years-ago it was the Avalon. Even CR had to downgrade their rating with a small comment and a picture on the bottom of a page.
 
Cars do change. Hopefully they improve.
#2704 of 6098
Re: If a car doesn't break [imidazol97] by andres3
Apr 09, 2007 (9:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Apr 07, 2007 4:16 pm)

I think the main and single reason Toyota and Honda won't Beef up their warranties is because their dealers don't want them to. There are a lot of idiots out there willing to spend an extra 1K to 1.5K on extended warranties for Honda and Toyotas that will NEVER need them. Since dumb people are high in number in this country and are willing to pay extra $$$ dollars for extended warranties that will cost Honda and Toyota nothing to provide; it's basically pure 100% profit for the dealer and Toyota and Honda.
 
The dealers probably make more profit from having this exist than they can afford (or at least) want to lose. They will not let Honda raise their warranties "for free" for this purpose.
#2705 of 6098
Chart from JD POwers by imidazol97
Apr 09, 2007 (9:29 am)
Reply
Has been around a while
 
#2706 of 6098
Re: The past [imidazol97] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Apr 09, 2007 (9:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Apr 09, 2007 9:15 am)

The "straw man" defense doesn't really work for Cadillac....it has to OUTSELL Lexus. Everything else about this anecdote, or that good review is irrelevant to a car company. The bottom line is: "will Americans buy it or not?"
 
Some of our most magnificent collectible/classic American cars were made by companies that soon after went out of business.
 
RE: PROBLEMS PER 100 VEHICLES:
 
do they define what a "problem" is exactly?
 
Is my Lexus window regulator problem equal to your Cadillac transmission problem or somebody else's Mercury with the bad dome light? How does this work?
 
#2707 of 6098
Re: The past [Mr_Shiftright] by andres3
Apr 09, 2007 (10:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Apr 09, 2007 9:39 am)

Good point on problems per 100 vehicles.
 
My Honda had a power seat that acted up a bit, window moldings/trim that rippled, and a rattle in the center console pocket storage door. (of course all of these we're covered under warranty and didn't cost me a dime)!
 
My Dodge had transmission failures, head gaskets leak, broken serpentine belts (for no reason and well maintained), bad corroding battery terminals and starter cables, wires), bad parking brake, bad Orings and seals, leaky gas tank, (all of which cost me big time $$$ money after warranty).
 
Which problems are worse?
#2708 of 6098
Re: The past [andres3] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Apr 09, 2007 (10:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: andres3 (Apr 09, 2007 10:02 am)

I tried to look this up at JD Power but their website is malfunctioning...LOL!
#2709 of 6098
... by plekto
Apr 09, 2007 (10:28 am)
Reply

2. Build a BMW 3-Series competitor. This is your "entry-level" Cadillac for new buyers

 
This would be like Bentley making a $100K entry-level car. There's no practical reason for Cadillac to try to compete here.
 
First off, all it does is cheapen their image. Mercedes won't bring their A class to the U.S. for precisely this reason. They learned the hard way with Chrysler that you need to protect your niche and learn to live within your means.
 
Secondly, if they want to move themselves UP into the luxury market, they need more top-end cars and less filler for the masses. The idea of every make being a full line is very 1970s/1980s thinking.
 
Third, GM knows it can't make a better car than the M3 - it's a waste of money, R&D, and effort, because it would have to be twice as good at less cost to win BMW owners over.
 
So they just don't bother. There will BE no small Cadillac in the U.S. If you want a small GM luxury car in the U.S., buy a Saab.
#2710 of 6098
Re: The past [Mr_Shiftright] by imidazol97
Apr 09, 2007 (10:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Apr 09, 2007 9:39 am)

>The "straw man" defense doesn't
 
I don't understand straw man reference. I posted the problems per 100 vehicles or whatever the rating system is.
 
People can kvetch as much as they want over what a problem is rated by JD Powers. I suspect they are intelligent enough to consider a rattle different from a transmission failing at 1000 miles as in some recent vehicles.

Messages Page 271 of 610
1
...
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement