Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 179 of 611
1
...
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
...
611
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1773 of 6098
Re: Life. Liberty. And the Pursuit. [mediapusher] by cooterbfd
Jan 13, 2007 (7:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: mediapusher (Jan 13, 2007 3:37 am)

And would you please tell me why a G.M. assembly line worker expects to make executive level wages and beyond to put together a car?? ($42+ per hour)
 
Hmmm... I must say...$42/hr equates to $87,360 per yr. with no ot. Compare that with the $210 MILLION, yes MILLION!!! I repeat MILLION that Home Depot gave their executive as a boot in the ass on the way out for doing a bad job and I don't see how you can equate $42/hr as "EXECUTIVE LEVEL WAGES". Hell, and independant electrician will charge you more than that (yes, yes, I know, overhead).
#1774 of 6098
Mr. Shiftright by imidazol97
Jan 13, 2007 (8:00 am)
Reply
>remind everyone to please stop the "brand-bashing" and keep the discussion civil and interesting for newcomers.
If we start digging ourselves into a hole, the whole topic becomes pointless.
This topic was intended by the creator of it to be about the future, not the past...at least that's why I joined it.
All the world already knows Cadillac's litany of past and ancient errors, so we're preaching to the choir.

 
I was hoping this discussion could end up on a positive tack instead of the old whining. It made a start but is now pulled back into the Cadillac's JANG mode (just ain't no good).
#1775 of 6098
Re: G.M. Assembly Wage Earners [cooterbfd] by mediapusher
Jan 13, 2007 (8:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Jan 13, 2007 7:53 am)

Those wages are not justified if most of the cars aren't selling well. I wouldn't have a problem with if they were selling well.
#1776 of 6098
Re: Life. Liberty. And the Pursuit. [cooterbfd] by sls002
Jan 13, 2007 (8:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Jan 13, 2007 7:53 am)

They did not give that $210 million to him "as a boot...", but it was part of the contract to hire him in the first place. It would be wise to know what one it talking about in the first place.
#1777 of 6098
Cadillac Commercial by louiswei
Jan 13, 2007 (8:28 am)
Reply
Just saw the new "Life, Liberty, and Pursuit" commercial. It shows 3 old Caddies plus a STS-V and at end it states: Since 1902. It's relatively short, like less than 15 seconds. Okay commercial I guess but kinda of lame comparing to Chevy's "It's ooooouuuuurrrrr coooouuuunnnntry".
#1778 of 6098
Rebates by plekto
Jan 13, 2007 (8:52 am)
Reply
I of course meant the end-of-year rebates and incentives. Even Honda offers a little off on their previous year models, and many Ford and GM buyers buy this way(as opposed to fleet sales and such). This knocks the price down a good 3-4K on most upper-end models. BMW and Mercedes and Lexus... Gotta haggle like crazy to maybe get $1K off.
 
Check this out:
http://www.carsdirect.com/build/options?zipcode=91107&acode=USB60BUC101D0&restor- e=false
 
Even Buick has $2500 off on the 2006 models. Officially, ther is a bit off on the 2006 CTSs as well, but finding one is getting really hard(seems they can sell all they make - that's not a bad sign, is it?)
 
http://www.carsdirect.com/build/options?zipcode=91107&acode=USB60MEC021D0&restor- e=false
Note that this is the top-end model with all the goodies. Add every bit of option and bling you can, and it's not even $24K.(actually a pretty nice car as it is at $21K)
 
So seeing a CTS in a year and a half(end of 2008/2009 models coming in) selling for $30K is definately a possibility. And honestly, 250+ HP out of the 3.6 is plenty if you have a manual transmission. That's actually about as much as you *want* with a 6 speed gearbox, since cars start to exhibit a binary throttle response once you get over 300HP or so.(though with automatic, it's understandable why you'd need 300HP to move it quickly, though)
#1779 of 6098
Re: G.M. Assembly Wage Earners [mediapusher] by cooterbfd
Jan 13, 2007 (9:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: mediapusher (Jan 13, 2007 8:12 am)

Those wages are not justified if most of the cars aren't selling well. I wouldn't have a problem with if they were selling well.
Who's fault is it they aren't selling well? Line workers can only install what upper management buys for them.
#1780 of 6098
Re: Life. Liberty. And the Pursuit. [sls002] by cooterbfd
Jan 13, 2007 (9:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Jan 13, 2007 8:23 am)

They did not give that $210 million to him "as a boot...", but it was part of the contract to hire him in the first place. It would be wise to know what one it talking about in the first place
Well, GM signed a CONTRACT to pay these people this type of money. My point is what is MORE out of whack?
#1781 of 6098
Old design heritage by xrunner2
Jan 13, 2007 (9:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: grbeck (Jan 13, 2007 6:59 am)

There's nothing wrong with a company using its heritage to sell new cars, especially when the competition (i.e., Lexus) doesn't have much of one.
 
Saw the heritage ad on tv. Recall there was a late 50's red Cadillac convertible shown. It seems that there were much much better designs by Cadillac - designs that were truly elegant - than that gross looking convertible with gigantic fins. There was another old Cadillac shown that also was gross, goofy looking - think it was a late 70's Seville with a bustle back. The front and rear of this car had absolutely no relationship, no integration. An abomination of a so-called design.
 
Cadillac has plenty very good designs from past that could have been used. A mystery to me how they chose the models that they did for their heritage to sell current product. One possible rationale is: look how great the new 2008 CTS looks and how far we have come in design over the years.
#1782 of 6098
Re: Mr. Shiftright [imidazol97] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jan 13, 2007 (10:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Jan 13, 2007 8:00 am)

" was hoping this discussion could end up on a positive tack instead of the old whining. It made a start but is now pulled back into the Cadillac's JANG mode (just ain't no good)."
 
Well I tried to get the message across but alas...I'm sure the regular host will intervene if the brand-bashing "rut" continues to dig itself deeper. The host has been most tolerant.
 
We try to be as democratic as possible so please be patient. Sometimes these things right themselves without intervention.
 
ON ANOTHER NOTE:
 
"Nostalgia" in marketing is a quick and easy way to right an ad, but an automaker has to be careful about this, especially in an age of such galloping technology. It wouldn't be wise I don't think for Cadillac to emphasis too much the Age of Excess....if I were them I'd stick to the glorious Golden Age of Cadillac, the 1930s, when it could indeed hold its own with just about any car in the world and when "princes and stars" really did own Cadillacs all over the world.

Messages Page 179 of 611
1
...
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
...
611
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement