- #1 of 64
-
Accord V6 vs IS250
by bknsf
-
Nov 24, 2006 (10:32 pm)
-
|
Just returned from the SF Auto show, great event. Anyway, I'm surprised this comparison hasn't been discussed.
I sometimes think these 2 vehicles are "apples" vs. "oranges". Clearly the Accord is cheaper, so I guess my question - is the IS250 worth the extra $4-6K. On one hand, the IS was much nicer, and I personally like the exterior better. But, it does lack the HPower of the Accord as well as features like folding rear seats, standard vs. premium gas, etc. Curious about others opinions.
|
- #2 of 64
-
Re: Accord V6 vs IS250 [bknsf]
by thegraduate
-
Nov 27, 2006 (11:41 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: bknsf (Nov 24, 2006 10:32 pm)
If you ever want to carry someone over 5'3" in the back seat, i'd go with the Honda. The extra power, $0.20 per gallon, and backseat room would be worth the extra money for the Honda for me. The fact that the Accord EXV6 can be had for under $25,000, with Navi for under $27k, I'd go with Honda.
|
- #3 of 64
-
These two vehicles are closer than you think!
by nross
-
Nov 27, 2006 (1:37 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: bknsf (Nov 24, 2006 10:32 pm)
I own both an 06 IS 250 AWD, and an 06 Accord EX 6 cyl sedan. The Accord will suprise you. The engine is an absolute joy. Lots of power and that Vtec loves to rev. Makes the IS feel like lead! Its also almost $10k less than the Lexus in price. The Honda also has alot more room inside. That said, the Lexus has a much nicer cabin, other than the room issue. Those ventilated seats are great in the summer. The AWD system sticks like glue to the road and plows through deep puddles and snow without any problems. The exterior is much nicer as well, but that more subjective. The IS handles and brakes slightly, and I mean slightly better, but the Accord steering has more feel. Both cars are very well made and I enjoy them equally. If you put the Honda engine in the Lexus it would be perfect. As far a mileage is concerned, I get between 24-25 MPG on premium fuel in the Lexus, and about 22MPG on regular in the Honda, so thats about a wash. Both are great cars and you would not go wrong with either one. Tough choice. If $ is a concern, go with the Honda. Definetly go V6 and get the standard stability control. If money is less important, go Lexus and get the greater luxury and AWD in the process.
|
- #4 of 64
-
Re: These two vehicles are closer than you think! [nross]
by thegraduate
-
Nov 27, 2006 (2:37 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: nross (Nov 27, 2006 1:37 pm)
Very nice and clear post, nross.
|
- #5 of 64
-
Re: These two vehicles are closer than you think! [thegraduate]
by bknsf
-
Nov 28, 2006 (8:27 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 27, 2006 2:37 pm)
Thanks for the input, but at least "on paper", the IS has a lot more going for it (thus maybe justifying the higher price). The IS beats the Accord V6 on:
>4yr warranty vs a 3 yr warranty
>Rear-wheel drive (I'm in Cali, so AWD isn't so important)
>Keyless ignition
>Tire pressure monitoring
>Better gas mileage (somewhat offsetting the higher gas price)
>and several other less important items (IMO).
I figure when the Accord is updated in '08(?) it will be more competitive, but currently it seems a step below.
|
- #6 of 64
-
Re: These two vehicles are closer than you think! [bknsf]
by nross
-
Nov 29, 2006 (11:13 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: bknsf (Nov 28, 2006 8:27 pm)
The IS has two more air bags (knee bags) better side airbags( they have a greater area and protect more space), and the first dual chamber front drivers bag. It has better crash test ratings than the Accord as well. The keyless ignition is great. Is the IS $10,000 better. No, but it is better. The tire pressure monitor is nice to have as the run flats seem to loose air more easily, and you need to check them more often. Speaking of those run flats, when the weather gets near freezing, they get very stiff and the ride turns harsh. Both cars are nice and an excellent value for their price. The Accord is less expensive and nicer than a loaded Camry. The IS is 6-10k less than a 3 (328i)series BMW and that car doesn't even come with a spare tire, which is a deal killer for me. I am very happy with both, and you can't go wrong with either one.
|
- #7 of 64
-
Re: These two vehicles are closer than you think! [nross]
by louiswei
-
Nov 29, 2006 (11:45 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: nross (Nov 29, 2006 11:13 am)
I don't think the IS comes with run-flats. I don't know about the 17" on the AWD but all the 18" tires are summer tires, NOT run-flats. My IS350 has a spare in the trunk.
|
- #8 of 64
-
Re: These two vehicles are closer than you think! [louiswei]
by nross
-
Nov 29, 2006 (11:59 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: louiswei (Nov 29, 2006 11:45 am)
On the East coast, every IS seems to have the run flats. They also have all have a spare tire. The 3 series BMW's don't have spares at all. If you get a flat, the run-flats are good for a hundred to one hundredfifty miles or so. Not good if you are driving on a 500 mile round trip. Could leave you stranded. Lexus first used the run-flats on the GS 300 with no spare included and a lot of customers complained, so they all now include spare tires. On the West coast you can get more tire choices. Also on the West coast, your cars come with the memory seats and on the East coast they do not. Also, at least for the first year of production, the West coast cars came with Xenon headlights and the East coast cars did not. I think this is a ridiculous way to go for Lexus.
|
- #9 of 64
-
Re: These two vehicles are closer than you think! [nross]
by louiswei
-
Nov 29, 2006 (12:30 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: nross (Nov 29, 2006 11:59 am)
I think the reason that East coast are getting run-flats is because most people opt for all-season tires over there anyway. In the South all the IS with 18" are coming with summer tires.
I believe if you choose the "expensive package"  on the East coast you'll be able to get xenon as well. I know in the South that's that case. However I don't understand why the xenon is standard equipment on the ES350 but not the IS. You would think that at least the IS350 should come standard with xenon if not all the IS. If Acura can offer xenon as standard eq on the TSX I think Lexus should do so on the IS as well. What pissed me off the most that one can't even get the xenon as a stand alone option for the 06'. Fourtunately they addressed that issue with the 07' but that still leave us 06' owners stranded. 
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans 
