Sign In Join 



Hybrids - News, Reviews and Views in the Press

567 messages,  Last post on Oct 30, 2009 at 9:21 PM

You are in the Hybrid Vehicles Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Toyota Camry Hybrid, Toyota Highlander Hybrid, Honda Civic, Hybrid Cars


Messages Page 52 of 58
1
...
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
...
58
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#506 of 567
Honda abandons its diesel plans in favor of hybrid options by kdhspyder
Apr 08, 2009 (1:18 pm)
Reply
From the President of Honda
 
Fukui also said Honda has decided not to proceed with its plans to put clean diesel engines in its large cars. He cites the cost of clearing tough emissions regulations in the United States and Japan as the reason. The more cost-effective solution will be a modified or possibly new hybrid drive system which will instead become the future green drivetrain for big vehicles.
 
Hybrids Yes, Diesels No
#507 of 567
press request by kirstie_h HOST
Apr 09, 2009 (11:53 am)
Reply
A reporter is looking to speak to consumers who have used or adapted solar power in their vehicles. In addition, if you use solar power in your home, the reporter is also interested in speaking to you. Please send your daytime phone number to ctalatiedmunds.com by Tuesday, April 14, 2009.
 
Thanks,
Chintan
Corporate Communications
Edmunds.com
#508 of 567
Hybrids ARE profitable - which some of us already knew by larsb
Apr 29, 2009 (9:21 am)
Reply
This is for those who have always called the hybrids "loss leaders" and were WRONG about that !!!
 
Despite what most people believe regarding the profitability of hybrids, Honda and Toyota have proven that you can make money on this type of product. Hybrids were once thought to be a money losing proposition for a company, but its no longer the case for Honda and Toyota at least.
#509 of 567
Re: Hybrids ARE profitable - which some of us already knew [larsb] by lzc
Apr 30, 2009 (5:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Apr 29, 2009 9:21 am)

While I hope Toyota is making profit on the Prius after all these years, your source didn't exactly convince me. It's a website promoting electric cars. The consensus of auto analysts remains that Toyota has lost money for years on the Prius. Whether that is still true today, of course, no one outside of Toyota knows.
 
Honda is a different story. Their hybrid system is much simpler and, presumably, less costly to manufacture.
#510 of 567
Re: Hybrids ARE profitable - which some of us already knew [lzc] by larsb
Apr 30, 2009 (5:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: lzc (Apr 30, 2009 5:22 am)

No, the source was a story in the Nikkei newspaper from Japan.
#511 of 567
Re: Hybrids ARE profitable - which some of us already knew [lzc] by kdhspyder
Apr 30, 2009 (11:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: lzc (Apr 30, 2009 5:22 am)

The math and accounting indicate otherwise... It's a very good discussion.
 
Yes Honda's IMA is much less expensive ... but the vehicle also sells for $2000 to $6000 less. Two years ago Toyota announced publicly that it was making money on the hybrids. Then it lowered the price of the Prius by $600 to $1200.
 
This leaked data is not surprising. The sheer weight of volume of units sold guarantees that it/they have been profitable.
#512 of 567
Re: Hybrids ARE profitable - which some of us already knew [larsb] by bamacar
Apr 30, 2009 (11:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Apr 30, 2009 5:50 am)

Where is the actual story? This little snippet means absolutely nothing. Is it all hybrids sold? For a specific year? For hybrids sold In Japan only where prices are fixed? Is this corporate profit only not including dealer profit?
 
Until I see the text, I don't believe it. If Toyota is getting 3500 dollar profit for a Prius Package 2 at 21500 as they are being sold today with incentives, I would be very surprised.
#513 of 567
Re: Hybrids ARE profitable - which some of us already knew [bamacar] by kdhspyder
Apr 30, 2009 (11:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: bamacar (Apr 30, 2009 11:11 am)

IMO the figures are being leaked since the year end results are just coming out soon. From the article it appears that the figure is an aggragate number for all of the hybrids.
 
It makes a lot of sense since most of the numbers have been known for some time now.
 
The selling price to the customer has little to do with the revenue to the vehicle maker. Until recently there were no rebates at all on the Prius. There was a $600 to $2000 discount introduced on the sticker back in June of 07 which is when I believe that the vehicles 'went positive'. Those sticker discounts have recently been increased in order to blow out the last of the 09s and a $1000 rebate has been added.
#514 of 567
Apr-2009 Hybrid sales by yerth10
May 01, 2009 (7:32 pm)
Reply
In Apr-2009, some 21,000 hybrid vehicles were sold.
Toyota - 12K +
Honda - 5K +
Ford - 2K +
GM - 1K +
 
I guess Hybrids are picking up. All expectations are on Prius-III.
More important is automaker should reduce the Hybrid Premium.
#515 of 567
Re: Apr-2009 Hybrid sales [yerth10] by kdhspyder
May 02, 2009 (5:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: yerth10 (May 01, 2009 7:32 pm)

More important is automaker should reduce the Hybrid Premium.
 
Both Toyota and Honda are in the process of doing just that. The new Insight II is the same technology as the HCH but the Insight II is about $2000 less than the HCH.
 
Toyota added sticker discounts to the 2009 Prius of ~$500 to $1000.
Then it added a $1000 rebate.
Then it published the 2010 prices and these are ~$300-$500 lower yet in MSRP.
IOW the new 2010 full MSRP on a standard model will be about $2000 lower than the similar vehicle sold last summer. Hybrid premium goodbye.

Messages Page 52 of 58
1
...
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
...
58
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement