Sign In Join 



Hybrids - News, Reviews and Views in the Press

567 messages,  Last post on Oct 30, 2009 at 9:21 PM

You are in the Hybrid Vehicles Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Toyota Camry Hybrid, Toyota Highlander Hybrid, Honda Civic, Hybrid Cars


Messages Page 3 of 57
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
57
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#21 of 567
Re: Slow Sales for Hybrids [larsb] by terry92270
Dec 06, 2006 (2:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 06, 2006 2:34 pm)

Larry is correct. Hybrids will be up for 2006 over 2005.
 
When gasoline goes up next year to $4 per gallon, they will go through the roof!
#22 of 567
Re: Slow Sales for Hybrids [larsb] by moparbad
Dec 06, 2006 (2:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 06, 2006 2:34 pm)

The year-on-year numbers make sense and are a good measure.
#23 of 567
Re: Slow Sales for Hybrids [moparbad] by kdhspyder
Dec 06, 2006 (3:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Dec 06, 2006 2:11 pm)

quote San Francisco Chronicle-Car makers sold 26,249 hybrids in August, the same month the average price of gasoline nationwide hit $3 per gallon. Since then, gasoline prices have fallen 24 percent, to $2.28 per gallon, and hybrids sales have dropped 31 percent to 18,117 in November, according to Edmunds.com.
 
Now that is truly selective choice of statistics to prove an invalid point. August is traditionally the single best sales month for many manufacturers, volume is the highest. November is traditionally one of the worst months each year, maybe the worst month. To take this writer's logic to it's extreme limit Nov '06 hybrid sales were infinitely higher than those.... in May 1998.
 
An equally invalid statistical choice would be to look at TOTAL hybrid sales this year, which are up dramatically, as a predictor of say one vehicle's outlook such as the HAH ... but then there are several more vehicle options for the market.
 
All-in-all a dubious use of time.
 
The market is too seasonal from month to month to look at one single snap shot. At the end of the year compare each model against last year.
#24 of 567
China's First Hybrid by moparbad
Dec 07, 2006 (12:45 pm)
Reply
Hybrid Chery
 
Would be interesting if Chery would export this hybrid.
#25 of 567
Money Losing Hybrid from Nissan by moparbad
Dec 08, 2006 (10:00 am)
Reply
Money Losing Nissan Hybrid
 
"Hybrids today are not a very viable economic proposition," said Dominique Thormann, Nissan North America's senior vice president for administration and finance. "It's still a loss-making proposition. ... It's unprofitable."
 
I wonder if Toyota makes any profit on hybrids?
#26 of 567
Re: Money Losing Hybrid from Nissan [moparbad] by gagrice
Dec 08, 2006 (10:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Dec 08, 2006 10:00 am)

I wonder if Toyota makes any profit on hybrids?
 
That is the $64k question. The hybrids give them the green image that allows them to sell their big line-up of gas guzzling trucks and SUVs. I can guarantee they are making a killing off of them. It is a problem some of the other auto makers would love to have.
#27 of 567
Re: Money Losing Hybrid from Nissan [moparbad] by larsb
Dec 08, 2006 (10:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Dec 08, 2006 10:00 am)

No other car maker is as efficient as Toyota. Just because NISSAN cannot build a hybrid at a profit does not mean Toyota cannot.
 
'Yota would not have 750,000 hybrids on the world's roads if they were losing money on them - be sensible people. They have stockholders and boards to answer to just like any other car company.
 
They have challenged their engineers to take half the cost and size away from the hybrid components. That's to make MORE money not to FINALLY make money.
 
I can post dozens of articles where Toyota says they are making money on hybrids. Nissan and GM and others who naysay that are merely jealous of the success of the Toyota hybrid family.
#28 of 567
Re: Money Losing Hybrid from Nissan [larsb] by goodcrd
Dec 08, 2006 (11:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 08, 2006 10:52 am)

Big question is what are they (Toyota) paying their worker's and what deals (incentives) were made for them to open assembly plants by the governments where the plants are located. Toyota has expanded drastically in the last ten years. Over the next few years they should start to experience the problems associated with over expansion. It is easier to experience large expansions then to maintain existing large multinational manufacturing organizations. What are the hidden costs? How will they handle disposing of the used batteries and chemicals used to produce these hybrid components? We will see this come to light in about 5 to 10 more years. What impact will this have on the environment? And most importantly who will pay for it?
#29 of 567
Re: Money Losing Hybrid from Nissan [larsb] by moparbad
Dec 08, 2006 (11:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 08, 2006 10:52 am)

'Yota would not have 750,000 hybrids on the world's roads if they were losing money on them - be sensible people. They have stockholders and boards to answer to just like any other car company.
 
Toyota has stockholders ergo hybrids are profitable is not the conclusion I'd be willing to bet my paycheck on.
 
Ford has stockholders, Ford sells hybrids, and Ford is losing ton's of money, literally ton's of money.
 
I suspect that Toyota does make a profit on the hybrids it sells in 2006 and 2007, however, even if each hybrid sold was sold at a loss, the percentage of hybrids sold by Toyota compared to the total number of vehicles sold by Toyota would certainly allow Toyota to be extremely profitable despite losing money on hybrids.
 
Even when Ford and GM were making money hand over fist they were losing money on small cars and making a fortune on trucks. And yet, they have stockholders and boards to answer to.
 
I am sensible.
 
P.S.
 
No other car maker is as efficient as Toyota
 
The two most efficient auto plants in North America are not Toyota plants. Most Efficient Auto Plants
 
Last but not least....
 
No other car maker is as efficient as Toyota.
 
Nissan North Americas Most Efficient Automaker
 
quote-
Factoring everything together, Harbour Report declared Nissan North America's most efficient automaker. Its plants required 28.46 hours of labor. According to analyst Harbour, that gives the Japanese manufacturer a $300- to $450-per-vehicle cost advantage over less efficient automakers. -end
 
#30 of 567
Re: Money Losing Hybrid from Nissan [moparbad] by terry92270
Dec 08, 2006 (11:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Dec 08, 2006 11:14 am)

It pays to read all of those articles:
 
"The good news for GM, Ford and DaimlerChrysler's Chrysler Group is that all three made progress in 2005, narrowing the efficiency gap with North American plants operated by Toyota, Honda and Nissan."
 
What that means is, they are catching up. Not better, not more efficient, it means their "best of the best" are behind, and moving up, not on the same level.

Messages Page 3 of 57
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
57
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement