Article Comments: 2007 Ford Edge Full Test

55 messages, Last post on Jun 19, 2008 at 3:01 PM

You are in the Ford Edge Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Ford Edge, SUV

Article comments for Full Test: 2007 Ford Edge SEL Plus AWD - On its face, and it's a big face, the 2007 Ford Edge has all the makings of a competitive crossover-utility vehicle, or CUV: rigid unit-body construction, ample 265-horsepower V6, all-wheel drive, cutting-edge styling (sorry) and room for five plus some luggage. It drives smoothly and quietly, and additional amenities include optional sat-nav, upgraded audio, rear-seat entertainment and a monster-sized power-sliding glass roof. So what's the problem? (more)

Outline

Messages Page 4 of 6: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; Prev; Next; Last

#26 of 55 Re: C'mon People [coldcranker] by akirby Nov 21, 2006 (8:53 pm)
Replying to: coldcranker (Nov 21, 2006 4:34 pm) If you added weight after designing the brakes - yes. But my point was they could engineer the brakes to stop the thing whether it weighs 4000 or 4600 lbs. Something is wrong here - either a pre-production issue or something changed at the last minute. No way they engineered it to stop like that.
#27 of 55 Re: C'mon People [coldcranker] by tidester HOST Nov 21, 2006 (9:36 pm)
Replying to: coldcranker (Nov 21, 2006 4:34 pm) F=MA said that Isaac Newton fellow, if you believe him.* Yes, but Newton also says the braking force (i.e. friction) is proportional to the weight so the masses "cancel out." You are probably thinking of that James Joule fellow who tells us the brakes heat up in proportion to the weight of the vehicle, i.e. Akirby's point. tidester, host
#28 of 55 Why the delay? by mschmal Nov 22, 2006 (8:29 am)
Does anyone know why the Edge is really delayed? Is it possible they are takeing the unvented rear roters off and putting on vented ones? The brakes are probably str8 off of the Fusion which is why the prototypes had unvented rear roters...I hope they change that for production. Mark. Replies to this message: steve_ (Nov 22, 2006 8:40 am) akirby (Nov 22, 2006 8:48 am) coldcranker (Nov 22, 2006 4:25 pm)
#29 of 55 Re: Why the delay? [mschmal] by steve_ HOST Nov 22, 2006 (8:40 am)
Replying to: mschmal (Nov 22, 2006 8:29 am) Rumors abound about the delay. Here's another. How Much Will Ford Fix the Edge? (The Driving Woman) So, cosmetics and ""two functional changes." One rear brake each would be "two functional changes" eh? Replies to this message: akirby (Nov 22, 2006 8:48 am) coldcranker (Nov 22, 2006 4:25 pm)
#30 of 55 Re: Why the delay? [steve_] by akirby Nov 22, 2006 (8:48 am)
Replying to: steve_ (Nov 22, 2006 8:40 am) Those were all done prior to job 1. The job 1 delays are just working out the kinks in the assembly line and supplier products. They're holding the vehicles until they can go 5 straight days with 0 defects. They're almost there. Replies to this message: coldcranker (Nov 22, 2006 4:25 pm)
#31 of 55 Edge's braking engineering by coldcranker Nov 22, 2006 (4:25 pm)
Replying to: akirby (Nov 22, 2006 8:48 am) The Edge's brakes already apply enough torque short of wheel lock. Therefore, wider tires would stop it quicker, not more braking torque. Its not the brakes, its the tires. That being said, you begin to see why high weight makes things difficult. Wider tires would make it fun on ice/snow and cut MPG, and few want that.
#32 of 55 Edge's Handling by mark19 Dec 29, 2006 (10:12 am)
I test drove an Edge, S-model, base model. the handling was decent, but what can you expect from a 4000lb vehicle? It soaked up the bumps well, the steering I do wish was a bit tighter. This car was more of a cruiser, instead of a curve-taker. I think for 80% of the population out there, this will be a comfortable vehicle to own. I have heard Ford will be making a "sport" version available and that they're working on it. That should account for the other 20% of the market. To me it felt like the Murano in ride quality. The driving position was very comfortable. I agree with others in that the front seats have to be the most comfortable Ford has had in A LONG TIME! Very supportive and the right amount of cushion! I didn't want to get out! Fit and finish was equal to Toyota and Honda. If not a bit more solid. Some of Toyota's latest models, are a bit thin in the doors. These doors had a nice "thud" when closing. I like that. Engine was responsive and no throttle lag like Toyota has on some of their vehicles. Also, I commend Ford on this engine, I can see why it was in Ward's ten best engines for 2006. Very smooth, refined. Ford definitely has been doing their homework (about time)! Transmission - 6 speed was smooth, but i felt that the shift points needed to be a bit more pronounced. I like to know when the car is shifting, it helps me know what gear I'm in. I only wish Ford would get rid of that UGLY green illumination and go with something less "1980's" and get a nice blue or white. Other than that, I think Ford, if they keep on this type of engineering or better, should be good for the future. Replies to this message: wwest (Jan 16, 2007 10:24 am)
#33 of 55 Lighting is on the way. by mschmal Dec 31, 2006 (8:48 pm)
ICE BLUE (tm). Bet you can't wait! Mark. Replies to this message: mark19 (Dec 31, 2006 10:41 pm)
#34 of 55 Re: Lighting is on the way. [mschmal] by mark19 Dec 31, 2006 (10:41 pm)
Replying to: mschmal (Dec 31, 2006 8:48 pm) Oh really? Ice blue illumination. Now we're talking. Good news! Hope they also are working on upgraded brakes as well. Would like them to be a little more sporty
#35 of 55 Re: C'mon People [cwalton1] by efb1 Jan 05, 2007 (2:09 pm)
Replying to: cwalton1 (Nov 20, 2006 9:04 pm) Chris, I get it and I wish you did as well. These statement you write are your opinion and with opinions comes biases. It is clear you have many. I own a Toyota and a Saab, I wish the American auto industry the best, but I buy what's in my own best interest. I wish you could see your biased opinion for what it is. An inflated Ford Fusion..lacking any cutting edge style.. sorry I think it looks pretty good. Criticizing the RSC system because it limits the ability to push the vehicle to its limit is stupid. Comparing the price points of a loaded EDGE to another's base vehicle is shortsighted. The US car industry was bad for many years. It's ashame that writers are still to biased and fearfullnow to write an objective, even handed review. Cheers,