Sign In Join 



Article Comments: 2006 Minivans Comparison Test

49 messages,  Last post on Dec 28, 2007 at 10:46 AM

You are in the Vans & Minivans Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Chrysler Town and Country, Dodge Caravan, Kia Sedona, Honda Odyssey, Toyota Sienna, Nissan Quest, Van


Messages Page 2 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#10 of 49
Re: Why test the 06 model? [ew3074] by alpha01
Nov 15, 2006 (12:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ew3074 (Nov 15, 2006 9:54 am)

I'm not sure what point your making, but this thread is about the minivan comparo, I only used the midsizers to illustrate the point that the Camry won, even if by narrow margins (you'll note though, that the text of the article GUSHES over the Camry, and edmunds.com editiors themselves were surprised the Camry won by such a small margin, given their general affinity towards it.)
 
Edmunds.com is NOT biased toward Honda, but the Ody won this comparo. Deal with it. I would have liked to have seen the '07s tested, but the simple fact is that Honda builds tremendous products. When they deserve to win comparos, they do. This does not mean that a publication is biased.
 
~alpha
#11 of 49
Re: Why test the 06 model? [ew3074] by jipster
Nov 15, 2006 (12:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ew3074 (Nov 15, 2006 12:09 am)

It really doesn't matter...
 
I agree with that. The fastest/best handling vehicle will always win a comparison test... even if it's falling apart during the test drive.
 
Motor Trend's long term test of the Ody had it being the best thing since sliced bread. Even though there were many problems with radio antenna, brake noise, squeaks, rattles, transmission shifting early/late... and the power sliding door malfunctioning in the open position, nessesitating the Motor Trend team to take back roads to the dealership to get it fixed. All the while they kept emphasizing that the repairs were "free under warranty", like that makes everything okay. For a vehicle under one year old, I'd say its unacceptable.
#12 of 49
Re: Why test the 06 model? [jipster] by alpha01
Nov 15, 2006 (2:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jipster (Nov 15, 2006 12:28 pm)

Winning a comparison test has nothing to do with the results of a Long Term test, let's be serious and stop looking for things to assail the publications on.
 
alpha
#13 of 49
Re: Why test the 06 model? [jipster] by ew3074
Nov 15, 2006 (3:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jipster (Nov 15, 2006 12:28 pm)

Yeah! I think for a family van comparison test, reliability is one of the most important things. It looks like this test does not take this factor into account that much. Fun-to-drive factor is not really that significant for many families.
#14 of 49
Re: Why test the 06 model? [ew3074] by rblader
Nov 15, 2006 (4:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ew3074 (Nov 15, 2006 3:05 pm)

Exactly! We couldn't care less if we could take the kids to their soccer practice .5 seconds slower. If we wanted a dragster or race car, we wouldn't have bought a minivan. Besides, even the fastest and best handling minivan - is still a minivan...
We're also wondering why Edmunds took MSRP into account instead of TMV. Ironically, thanks to Edmunds, we got ours at exactly TMV (almost $5,000 below MSRP-no rebate, took 3.9%60months instead. 0%60months not available in our area, but available in others) with virtually no haggling. Yeah yeah yeah... Resale value would suffer-I know.. Is the resale value important to us? YES(why not?). Is it at the top of our priority list? Absolutely not-we didn't buy the car to sell it. Reliability, features(factory Xenon HID, AWD with VSC/Trac cntl, Dynamic Laser Cruise control-yes it will automatically coast or even hit the brakes for you), comfort(for those long roadtrips) weighed-in more.
 
...'06 Sienna Limited AWD w/ NAV, DVD & Z1 package ($38,195.00 NO rebate, 3.960mos.)...recently averaged 26 MPG during our 600-mile break-in roadtrip.(varied speed between 65 and 85-for break-in purposes, would've gotten more if we cruised steadily)
$765 for Toyota Platinum 7yr/100k/$0 deductible Extended Warranty
 
Not brandname fanboy... never will be...
previous cars(all good experience-maintenance fanatic and common sense car care): '89 Ford Probe, '92 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD, '97 Subaru Outback Sport, '01 Mazda MPV ES
Current cars: '04 Subaru Forester XT Premium (COBB Stage 2 with bolt-on STI(ebay) suspension package) 225/55ZR16, '05 Honda Accord LX, '06 Toyota Sienna Limited AWD
 
#15 of 49
Re: Why test the 06 model? [jipster] by socalawd
Nov 15, 2006 (10:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jipster (Nov 15, 2006 12:28 pm)

Motor Trend's long term test of the Ody had it being the best thing since sliced bread. Even though there were many problems with radio antenna, brake noise, squeaks, rattles, transmission shifting early/late... and the power sliding door malfunctioning in the open position, nessesitating the Motor Trend team to take back roads to the dealership to get it fixed. All the while they kept emphasizing that the repairs were "free under warranty", like that makes everything okay. For a vehicle under one year old, I'd say its unacceptable.
 
Well then don't buy that one vehicle. Look at the edmunds longterm test! No issues also the car(motor trend) did go 25K miles and the break noise I have heard is fixed by updated pads. My 2001 caravan was in the shop many times the first year with 3 follow ups for a radio problem. When I went in for my latest service on my Odyssey, they asked if I had any issues. My wife told me she heard a grinding noise one time so I told them about it walla new brake pads at 15K miles. I have had no other problems(And that was one I didn't know I had) Now check out the 2001 DGC long term test if you want unacceptable. My Ody has served me well gets good gas mileage and was under 30K for the EX-L with DVD. All in all I'd buy it again.
#16 of 49
Why Mention Sticker Prices? by goatrope
Nov 16, 2006 (7:23 am)
Reply
I don't understand why Edmunds.com - creator of the TMV, insists on mentioning irrelevant sticker prices when comparing vehicles. It just makes the so-called "experts" look uninformed.
 
Also, why was the Kia tested rather than the Hyundai Entourage? The Hyundai has a significantly nicer interior, a quieter ride (better door and window seals and more sound deadener) and more features. Since you were testing the high end vans, why didn't you go for the high-end Korean van?
 
Also, the story mentioned the "Sedona's portly 4729-pound curb weight", yet the Edmund's specs page (from the Sedona EX) lists it as having a curb weight of 4,387 lbs. Where did the extra 342 lbs. come from? Is it indeed the heaviest van in the test, or the lightest?
#17 of 49
Re: Why test the 06 model? [socalawd] by jipster
Nov 16, 2006 (9:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: socalawd (Nov 15, 2006 10:57 pm)

Well then don't buy that one vehicle.
 
I didn't. Don't know of anyone who would want to buy that particular Ody. But, the point was, that despite the long list of problems with the van, the overall theme of MT's article was nothing but positive. Even the negatives had a positive spin put on them. i.e Raving about VCM, yet the average mpg was only 18.3 mpg. No where in the article was it mentioned that the Ody was under 4 recalls for separate components. Glossed over was this comment from the log book, "I experienced excessive engine braking when downshifting to second gear. It felt like I'd slammed on the brakes!" Doesn't all of the above sound a bit biased to you?
 
Look at Edmunds long-term test
 
Wow.... three whole weeks. Hardly a long-term test in my book.
 
Now, is the Ody a good van. Sure it is, it's good if it is the right van for your particular needs. Looks as if the overall quality/reliability is down for the Ody though. Many times perception equals reality. I went in to test drive the Ody with high expectations. The perception I had was the Ody was the best in all areas hands down. But, when I took the test drive I realized perception wasn't reality, and I was disappointed in the Odys performance.
 
So, all of you future minivans buyers out there, take all of these comparison tests with a grain of salt. Be opened minded and pick the van thats right for your needs and budget... not the needs of some auto mag writer.
#18 of 49
Re: Why Mention Sticker Prices? [goatrope] by alpha01
Nov 16, 2006 (10:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: goatrope (Nov 16, 2006 7:23 am)

Sticker prices are used because they are what the manufacturer suggests as retail. What each individual consumer pays is up to the individual consumer.
 
Are you serious about the Kia vs. Hyundai interior? They are almost exactly the same, with very detail changes. We're not talking about the Optima and Sonata here, which have different placement of vents, controls, etc.
 
What are the features that the Entourage has that the top-end Sedona lacks?
 
Finally, I'm looking at the spec sheet :
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=117437/pageId=104- 463
 
And I don't see a discrepancy. Did edmunds.com update it or are you looking somewhere else perhaps by accident?
 
~alpha
#19 of 49
Re: Why test the 06 model? [jipster] by rorr
Nov 16, 2006 (12:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jipster (Nov 16, 2006 9:37 am)

"Wow.... three whole weeks. Hardly a long-term test in my book. "
 
You ARE aware that Edmunds just wrapped up a one-year long term test on an '05 Odyssey Touring, aren't you?
 
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/LongTerm/articleId=104757

Messages Page 2 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement