Sign In Join 



2009 Chevy Impala RWD

124 messages,  Last post on Feb 28, 2008 at 4:33 PM

You are in the Future Vehicles Forum. Your Host is kirstie_h

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Impala, Automotive News


Messages Page 11 of 13
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#97 of 124
Re: 2009-20111 Impala [m1miata] by batista
Jun 05, 2007 (2:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: m1miata (Jun 05, 2007 11:22 am)

then there is the Solstice/Sky, which could use some refinement/changes
 
What? The Solstice/Sky are new for 2006 and GM won't update it until 2009 or 2010. Do you think the new 07 Camry will get reworked for 2008?
#98 of 124
Re: 2009-20111 Impala [batista] by m1miata
Jun 05, 2007 (6:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: batista (Jun 05, 2007 2:19 pm)

The Solstice and Sky both lack a roll bar for safety. The Solstice has too short and most uncomfortable an armrest one could imagine on a car with rather high door window sills. This means you may actually need an armrest on the door side. Well the cut-out doesn't go back far enough and it is wrong angled. The top is not so attractive and whole system less than tops in class. My guess is that it got off to the market place before completion. As for it competing for road performance and overall quality, that is debatable. In the looks department, it is job well done, except for the top.
 
And no, the Camry doesn't need to be reworked, though the odd bump on the nose could be removed, unless it has some purpose for sound / wind noise or gas mileage - who knows. Second thought, lose the bump on nose at any cost. Overall, the Camry is pretty neat looking car, all the way to its Bangle butt. The interior is not up to Toyota's best efforts to date. Could be upgraded, along with taking the sore nose off. Otherwise, it is thoroughly modern - an up to date car, with great gas mileage and HP.
Loren
#99 of 124
Re: 2009-20111 Impala [m1miata] by charts2
Jun 06, 2007 (4:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: m1miata (Jun 05, 2007 11:22 am)

You can't scrap the car lines under $20,000 (but I am sure GM wish they could). GM makes next to nothing on the smaller car lines. They make these cars only because they need them to balance the CAFE numbers otherwise a hefty gas tax would be on the larger cars.
 
  Trucks are GMs financial strength. They make a ton on each loaded pickup/large SUV they sell. Silverado will sell over 700,000 units this model year.
 
  Example smaller car lines. Latest information is that Saturn up until 2006 figures has never made a profit for GM.
#100 of 124
Re: 2009-20111 Impala [charts2] by bobber1
Jul 20, 2007 (7:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: charts2 (Jun 06, 2007 4:31 am)

Hey I was shopping today for a new Impala and the Chevy dealer told me a new version is coming out in the next 6 months. He claims it will be bigger than the current Impala, but will still be FWD and have 3.5 and 3.9 liter engine options. Has anyone else heard anything about this?
 
While I've got 152,000 on my 02 Impala, I'm going to keep driving for a while to see if a new ones coming. I don't like the current Impala as well as my old one. Less leg room in back and poor rear window vision and mirrors relative to my version.
#101 of 124
Re: 2009-20111 Impala [bobber1] by nosirrahg
Jul 20, 2007 (1:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bobber1 (Jul 20, 2007 7:00 am)

He could be referring to the new Malibu, though they're supposed to come with a 2.4 (4-cylinder) and 3.6 (V6).
 
I guess it's possible they could be doing a "refresh" on the current Impala (since the 3.5 and 3.9 are available now, and it's due to be replaced by the RWD version in a couple of years), but I haven't seen any "spy photos" posted anywhere about that. But even if that's the case the changes would likely be cosmetic at best, and probably limited to the extreme front/rear of the car (and possibly some interior tweaks).
 
But either way I wouldn't think there's a "new" version of the Impala coming in the next 6 months.
#102 of 124
Re: 2009-20111 Impala [nosirrahg] by gb540
Jul 21, 2007 (1:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nosirrahg (Jul 20, 2007 1:17 pm)

GM is making a BIG mistake if they go RWD only. Either have an affordable AWD option, or surrender your family-sedan market share to the imports.
 
Why? I'm in the Rust Belt. RWD stinks in snow and ice! No fancy talk about differential locks, weighting down the trunk, and "snow tires" will redeem it. Besides who wants to do such baby sitting? It's not 1947 anymore.
 
People bitch that you need RWD for performance. On a FAMILY SEDAN?? Whatever. If you wanna burn your tires on a Saturday night get a sports car.
 
GM should be going all-out on getting the Chevy Volt to market instead.
#103 of 124
Re: 2009-20111 Impala [bobber1] by ryster
Jul 22, 2007 (6:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobber1 (Jul 20, 2007 7:00 am)

The 2008 Impala is already posted on Chevy's website and it is the same as the 06-07 except for some changes to the trimlines and options and prices. I can't imagine Chevy would do a 2008 run and then make changes within 6 months. It can take longer than that to retool the plant for such changes, and the current Impala is selling very well for Chevy.
 
I recall reading at another site somewhere that the New Impala will be released in calendar year 2010 as a 2011 Model Year vehicle. That means 3 more years with the current style. Not sure if what I read is actally true, however.
#104 of 124
Re: 2009-20111 Impala [gb540] by qbrozen
Jul 23, 2007 (5:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: gb540 (Jul 21, 2007 1:40 pm)

I have a feeling you won't be back to reply ... but here goes anyway.
 
We don't yet know if AWD won't be available. I would think it is a strong possibility. BUT, let's say its not. Chevy has plenty of FWD cars in the stable to choose from. They NEED a RWD sedan! They are losing in the family sedan wars BECAUSE they are always trying to beat Honda/Toyota at their game. You need to offer something they don't. That's RWD. The Chrylser 300 has been successful beyond anyone's dreams. Chevy's only problem with offering a large RWD sedan is that they waited so damned long!
 
By the way, you aren't alone up here in the snow belt, and I have NO worries about driving a car like this in the snow. There is no doubt my FWD cars have been great in the snow, but I also spent the first several years of my driving life with nothing but RWD trucks. Care needs to be taken in foul weather no matter what you are driving. People always manage to wreck in bad weather, and I've noticed that these people have ALL TYPES of drivetrains. AWD, RWD, FWD doesn't matter if you are a careless driver.
#105 of 124
Re: 2009-20111 Impala [qbrozen] by ryster
Jul 23, 2007 (9:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jul 23, 2007 5:30 am)

I am not the person you responded to, but just wanted to add some comments.
 
I agree with you that RWD can work just as well in the snow as FWD. I drove my '99 Camaro in some pretty heavy unplowed snow and had no issues. It is all about HOW you drive, not necessarily what you are driving. RWD with good all-season or winter tires and driven sensibly will be just as good as FWD or AWD with good all-season or winter tires.
 
When I was shopping for my new car last year, it came down to the '06 Impala, the '06 Dodge Charger SE V6, or a '06 Chrysler 300 Base 2.7L V6. I went with the Impala, as it had a more comfortable interior, better fuel economy, and a slightly better quality reputation.
 
If Chevy goes RWD on the next Impala, I hope they offer the new direct injection V6 that Cadillac is using in 2008. It has V8 power, with slightly better than V8 fuel economy. Initial reviews are very positive.
 
I would also like to see Chevy upgrade their interiors with better materials and tighter tolerances. If Hyundai can offer interiors like they do in the Sonata and Azera for mid-$20K's there is NO REASON that Chevy can't do the same.
 
So, offer me a $25K RWD Impala with the 300+ horsepower direct injection V6, a well put together interior with CLOTH bucket seats, OnStar, ABS/Trac, 6 airbags, power everything, 17" alloys (NO Goodyear tires, please!), and dual exhaust...I will buy! I could probably live without the direct injection V6, but the V6 they use should have at least 265hp. If the V6 model is not available for $25K or less, then I WILL go elsewhere (unless the new Malibu is really as good as they say it will be).
 
Pontiac will be selling a V6 version of the upcoming RWD G8. That is another possible alternative, although probably not as roomy as the Impala will be.
#106 of 124
Re: 2009-20111 Impala [ryster] by qbrozen
Jul 23, 2007 (10:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: ryster (Jul 23, 2007 9:38 am)

The only part of your post I have to disagree with is the price.
 
The 3.5L 300 starts at just over $29k. So I don't see Chevy offering up a car that competes directly with that for $4k less.

Messages Page 11 of 13
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement