Sign In Join 



2009 Chevy Impala RWD

124 messages,  Last post on Feb 28, 2008 at 4:33 PM

You are in the Future Vehicles Forum. Your Host is kirstie_h

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Impala, Automotive News


Messages Page 2 of 13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
13
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#10 of 124
With the G6 though... by andre1969
Nov 15, 2006 (9:07 am)
Reply
isn't the only way to get a manual is to get the stripper 4-cyl version? I guess one big problem is that the domestic makers tend to look at manual shifts as cars for cheap people, so they just don't put much effort into them. In contrast, the Japanese and Europeans are more willing to offer a manual transmission with a more upscale, powerful car.
#11 of 124
Re: With the G6 though... [andre1969] by sls002
Nov 15, 2006 (9:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 15, 2006 9:07 am)

Actually, the opposite. Only the GT G6 with the 3.9 V6 is offered with the 6 speed manual.
#12 of 124
Re: With the G6 though... [sls002] by andre1969
Nov 15, 2006 (10:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Nov 15, 2006 9:11 am)

Actually, the opposite. Only the GT G6 with the 3.9 V6 is offered with the 6 speed manual.
 
Oh cool...looks like Pontiac actually TRIED to do something fun with a stick then!
 
I thought I read somewhere that the 3.9 is going to get replaced in the G6 by the 3.6 DOHC V-6? I wonder if they'll still mate a stick shift to that engine?
#13 of 124
Re: . [sls002] by john_324
Nov 15, 2006 (10:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Nov 15, 2006 8:39 am)

It's true that most people don't buy manuals anymore...that's why I think having a generic manual tranny that could be purchased as an option on an array of cars would be cool, for the tiny percentage of us who like them. I'd be willing to pay extra for one (regrettably).
 
I'm thinking really in terms of bigger, 4-door sedans here. For them, when a manual is available (rarely), you have to buy the high-end-expensive-loaded with-heated-seats-and-other-things-I-don't-need-performance model to get it.
 
So how cool would it be if GM offered the "sport transmission" option for the Impala, Malibu, etc., across the line? Surely there are some people who need a family car who'd still like to have a little fun while driving...
#14 of 124
Makes sense to me..... by merc1
Nov 15, 2006 (10:26 pm)
Reply
This makes sense to me if the next Malibu is going to grow in size and move upmarket just a bit.
 
This and the rumors swirling around about Pontiac going all RWD by 2010 show that someone at GM has a clue. How cool would an entire lineup of true peformance, rwd cars be from Pontiac? Very cool indeed. The GTO, G6, G8, Solstice and G5 all rwd? Yikes. Now GM will have to understand that the Pontiac division probably won't sell in exactly huge numbers because of this change, they'll have to realize and treat the new Pontiac as an enthusiasts brand.
 
M
#15 of 124
Does by guss
Nov 16, 2006 (5:14 am)
Reply
anyone have any experience with the newer rwd cars like the 300 in the snow ? I know the newer traction controls are supposed to be better but do they help that much.
 
I am just wondering because I love driving rwd cars for about 350 days a year, it's just those other 15 days of snow and rain that keeps me from buying another. I always get flashbacks to trying to get my rwd Mazda to work about 15 years ago.
 
It's not a good feeling trying to coax them up 10 degree hill in 3rd gear going 5 mph.
#16 of 124
Re: Does [guss] by bumpy
Nov 16, 2006 (9:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: guss (Nov 16, 2006 5:14 am)

Not personally, but my dad reports that the traction and stability control on his E320 handles just fine in snow and slush.
 
It's not a good feeling trying to coax them up 10 degree hill in 3rd gear going 5 mph.
 
That's why most RWD cars now have an AWD option, and presumably the Impala would as well (the Holden Commodore does).
#17 of 124
Re: Does [guss] by andre1969
Nov 16, 2006 (10:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: guss (Nov 16, 2006 5:14 am)

anyone have any experience with the newer rwd cars like the 300 in the snow ? I know the newer traction controls are supposed to be better but do they help that much.
 
This is only anecdotal evidence, but back in 1999 a buddy of mine bought a '95 Grand Marquis with traction control and ABS. First snowstorm we had he got worried because he said it was sounding funny. He went to a gas station pay phone a few miles from my place, and was worried about driving it any more until I looked at it for him. Well, it turns out he was pushing that car to its limits on the slick roads, and the traction control and ABS were going into overtime trying to keep him from losing control.
 
Basically, he was driving that thing much at much higher speeds than what I would have driven my FWD Intrepid.
 
But then a few years ago, he got it stuck in the snow in my yard. Come to think of it, after he replaced it with a 2004 Crown Vic with ABS and traction control, he got that one stuck in the snow in my yard, too!
#18 of 124
Is it 2009 or 2010 ? by rockylee
Nov 22, 2006 (2:07 am)
Reply
I heard both. Motor Trend, is saying 2010 while others say this hot lookin' Muscle Sedan will be here for 2009. The earlier the better. I can't wait for confirmation.
 
Rocky
#19 of 124
Re: Is it 2009 or 2010 ? [rockylee] by lemko
Nov 22, 2006 (6:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: rockylee (Nov 22, 2006 2:07 am)

Well, I hope it gets here soon and looks like an Impala, (six taillights and all) rather than an Accord on steroids.

Messages Page 2 of 13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
13
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement