Sign In Join 



Mazda 5 vs Kia Rondo

803 messages,  Last post on Nov 16, 2009 at 3:25 PM

You are in the Mazda Mazda5 Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDA5, Kia Rondo, Car Comparisons, Car Buying, Wagon


Messages Page 47 of 81
1
...
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
...
81
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#460 of 803
Re: To nissmazlover [coolmazda5] by tmurphy
Jun 17, 2008 (8:55 am)
Reply

Whad' I tell ya.
#461 of 803
It may well parse out that way by garnermike
Jun 17, 2008 (8:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: coolmazda5 (Jun 17, 2008 6:48 am)

I partially fit your Rondo audience profile (older, no kids to deal with anymore). But I preferred the LX I-4 for mpg reasons, and I don't care for leather in a car, nor the capability of its sound system. As for "looks", beauty is in the eye of the beholder---I kinda like the way a Rondo looks. Besides, I own 2 other georgeous cars, and 5 in all, so if any one car I owned was ugly, I wouldn't worry about those bad looks somehow reflecting poorly on me or my taste
#462 of 803
Re: Nissmazlover seems to want to take over this thread? [bgw] by radar1
Jun 17, 2008 (9:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: bgw (Jun 16, 2008 1:33 pm)

BQW,
 
Your post sounds pretty much the same as what I discovered while test driving these vehicles.
I was looking for a replacement for our Focus hatchback and tested the M5, Rondo, and Subaru Outback wagon and Forester. I liked every one of them for different reasons. I had pretty much decided the Rondo was the one for us, but the Subaru dealer gave us such a great trade in on the Outback, that's what we got.
Although I liked the M5, two items that made me wary of purchasing one was the "not recommended" towing rating in the USA, and the fact that they still haven't provided any USA crash test ratings after all these years.
Only the Rondo and Subaru provide the manufacturers tow rating for my pop up camper. If I bought the M5 it would mean I'd have to get rid of the camper, (and even the small utility trailer I have) or be forced to keep my truck for towing.
(My daily beater is a 2005 Hyundai Accent hatchback 5-sp 37 MPG)
#463 of 803
Re: Nissmazlover seems to want to take over this thread? [radar1] by kubas
Jun 17, 2008 (10:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: radar1 (Jun 17, 2008 9:12 am)

>>Although I liked the M5, two items that made me wary of purchasing one was the "not recommended" towing rating in the USA, and the fact that they still haven't provided any USA crash test ratings after all these years.
 
EuroNCAP crash results for M5 are much better than for the Rondo. As a matter of fact most of the korean cars who have 5 star ratings in the USA are rated 4 star only in Europe.
#464 of 803
Re: It may well parse out that way [garnermike] by coolmazda5
Jun 17, 2008 (11:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: garnermike (Jun 17, 2008 8:58 am)

Yeah, I don't own that many cars (I can only afford 2 ) but I rent a lot from work. Mazda has surprised me for its handling and finish for a car its price (even on the most basic trim, including people movers)
 
And yes, I have not rented a Rondo but I have rented from the KIA+Hyundai family and their handling and interior quality have turned me off. Same as when I rent cars like Chevy Malibus, Dodge Avengers, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Sienna, Chrysler T&C, Saturn VUEs and even a Chevy Impala SS
 
KIA+Hyundai family cars rented, decent engine and features but not impressed on handling nor finish:
- Hyundai Sonata (twice)
- KIA Rio
 
From Mazda. Rented, not fancy Ferraris but really liked:
- Mazda6
- Mazda3
- Mazda MPV
- Mazda5 AT. Believe it or not, I got one the other day and was OK, even AT
 
And as I posted earlier, I saw a leather Rondo on the rental area the other day, I honestly thought it was vinyl
#465 of 803
Re: Nissmazlover seems to want to take over this thread? [kubas] by kubas
Jun 17, 2008 (11:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: kubas (Jun 17, 2008 10:57 am)

Kia Rondo - 4 stars
 
Front: 9
Side: 15
 
Comments
Front impact
Although the drivers footwell did not rupture, there was extensive deformation and the clutch pedal moved rearward by 175mm, leading to a weak rating for protection of the driver's lower leg, feet and ankles. Structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.
 
Side impact
The Carens scored maximum points based on the dummy responses in the side impact and pole tests. However, the driver's door became unlatched in the side impact and the car was penalised for this.
 
Mazda 5 (2005) - 5 stars
 
Front: 13
Side: 16
 
Front impact
There was heavy distortion and rupture of the driver's footwell in the frontal test. The pedals presented a risk of injury to the driver's lower legs. Structures in the dashboard represented a potential hazard to the knees and femurs.
 
Side impact
The car scored maximum points for its performance in the side impact and pole tests.
 
NHTSA frontal test is conducted at 56 km/h (35 mi/h). EuroNCAP represents a more severe crash than the NHTSA test as it is performed at 64 km/h (40 mph) into an offset deformable barrier.

Messages Page 47 of 81
1
...
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
...
81
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement