You are here:
Forums
Vans & Minivans
Mazda Mazda5
Mazda 5 vs Kia Rondo

806 messages, Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 2:38 PM
You are in the Mazda Mazda5 Forum. Your Host is Karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: conwelpic (Feb 20, 2008 7:06 am) It is funny, but if you compare it to any minivan (which I think they have kept the term mini just to distract the consumer) it wins hands-down, except in weight and space Yeah, in the US has also won the "A Lowest True Cost To Own" vehicle for January 2008. Again, compared to "minivans" of course this one costs peanuts, especially gas http://www.mazdausa.com/MusaWeb/displayPage.action?pageParameter=modelsPress&veh- - icleCode=MZ5 And talking about fuel: IntelliChoice Excellent Value and Best in Class Award Winner * Lowest Fuel Costs in Class * Lowest Operating Costs in Class * Lowest Ownership Costs in Class — IntelliChoice.com 02.2008
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: coolmazda5 (Feb 20, 2008 7:58 am) Having owned/driven it now since October, I've been asked many times "what exactly is a Rondo?" It is asked either by friends who've driven in it and are quite impressed (by its cargo room, driving characteristics, 7 seats, and good mpg) or by friends and family from afar who want to know about my new car. My own tailored answer is that it's essentially a "microvan." Smaller than all other minivans, FWD, 5-7 seating, lots of hauling room, car-like drive. That's how I view it in my mind. It is only un-minivan like in not having an AWD option nor sliding side doors.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: garnermike (Feb 20, 2008 8:32 am) If we were in Europe or Asia they would have a proper, more realistic classification: - Compact MPV (Multi Purpose Vehicle) - MAV (Multi Activity Vehicle) - Space Wagon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_MPV Oh well it will take time I guess (if the Mazda5 and Rondo models don't disappear first in favor of a small SUV or a crossover XX whatever) |
|
|
Just saw this report. IRVINE, Calif., Feb. 20 /PRNewswire/ -- The 2008 Kia Rondo was named a "Best Value" by Parents Magazine and Edmunds.com in their annual list of Best Family Cars. Parents cited the optional third row, allowing seating for seven, as just one of the reasons the Rondo is a good choice for families. The full report can be found here; http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/kia-rondo-named-to-parents-magazine-and-- edmundscom-best-family,286202.shtml John
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: radar1 (Feb 21, 2008 6:11 am) http://www.parents.com/parents/slideshow/slideShow.jsp?slideid=/templatedata/par- - - ents/slideshow/data/1202324985924.xml&page=1 Added: Also this should mean that the 2008 has been finally launched in the US I believe. Any new stuff compared to the 2007? |
|
|
Mazda 5: 2021 units a 29.1% increase over sales of Feb '07 of 1565 units Rondo sales: 3616 units
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: conwelpic (Mar 03, 2008 3:00 pm) The MAZDA5 multi-activity vehicle, which has been freshened for 2008, sold 2,021 units, a 29.1 percent increase, and the best month for the vehicle since March, 2006 Mazda Canada, Inc. reported February sales of 5,810 units, up 12.4 percent, and their best-ever February. Additionally, Mazda Canada reported best-ever February sales for MAZDA5, MX-5 and B-Series. Year-to-date, MCI reports 10,542 vehicles sold, up 9.3 percent. |
|
|
Replying to: coolmazda5 (Feb 08, 2008 4:40 pm) 1. I felt that the rondo had more room overall (seating and cargo), although this has been hard to prove/disprove because the cargo room calculations on vehicles must have been different methods. If you've looked at both, I would be certain that most people would side with the Rondo on space. 2. More seating options (this has already been discussed in great detail). 3. I liked the look better than the M5, A lot of this has to do with the sliding doors. I think the M5 looks like a "microvan" because of these. The "sporty" look and the "microvan" oxymoron appearance does not work for me. I describe the Rondo as a tall station wagon or hatcback. However, I agree that the different colors make a huge difference in the Rondo's appearance. I have black, but would have also accepted urban gray. I don't like the lighter colors on the Rondo because how the black trim/grill contrasts with the color. The beige shown in the edmunds review doesn't do the black or gray Rondos justice. (This is my opinion, so no offense other Rondo owners). 4. Price: cheaper than the used M5 that Kia had on the lot 5. The drive was great. Honestly didn't notice much difference between the M5, but I'll take your word and most reviewers words for it that the M5 handles better. But, Rondo had ESC and ABS standard, which resulted in a safer feel. My only hang-up was that it was a Kia. I am a previous Mazda owner (87 323 -- Great reliable car) and a firm believer in Japanese cars. But the waranty and the more recent improvements in reliablility made me feel comfortable. Also, please see my pic showing cargo room. This is a standard size Range/Oven new in the box that slid easily into the Rondo with the back seats down. I know I was impressed. I wonder if the M5 can do the same. Full-Size Link
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: timtlm (Mar 05, 2008 7:52 am) The Mazda5 hatch opening is around: 34" (86.36cm) Height, 40" (101.6cm) Width. Your box looks tall so that may be an issue. Any picture with all the occupants (5 or 7 seater)? Something like this?
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Vans & Minivans
Mazda Mazda5
Mazda 5 vs Kia Rondo
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Mazda MAZDA5
2009 Kia Rondo



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats