Sign In Join 



Mazda 5 vs Kia Rondo

803 messages,  Last post on Nov 16, 2009 at 3:25 PM

You are in the Mazda Mazda5 Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDA5, Kia Rondo, Car Comparisons, Car Buying, Wagon


Messages Page 15 of 81
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
81
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#138 of 803
compared them at the auto show by conwelpic
Apr 17, 2007 (5:39 am)
Reply
I was able to check out the M5 and Rondo at the Toronto Auto Show but found the Rondo more to my liking. On the M5 I did not like the rear sliding doors or the black only interior (felt too enclosed), also did not like the rear storage area as it was not a solid floor with the seats flat (we have a golden retriever and could step in the gaps); not as much underfloor storage as the Rondo. Had no use for the third seating and preferred the second seater to be for three across if required.
 
There is also much more standard features on the Rondo (comparing it to the Rondo EX L4 model); more storage with the seats down; greater leg and headroom; better fuel mileage. The Rondo definitely the clear winner.
 
It will be interesting to see how the sales compare as the year progresses as the M5 has had quite a head start.
#139 of 803
Comparison article by odman
May 15, 2007 (3:02 am)
Reply
Here's a Canadian comparison article. I think the author said in a prior article that he bought a Rondo, so his conclusions may be influenced by that, but good press is good press:
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/driving/story.html?id=fa1e4465-f7b5-47f4- -8c2e-4e68d95fd6f9
#140 of 803
Re: compared them at the auto show [conwelpic] by bobw3
May 15, 2007 (6:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: conwelpic (Apr 17, 2007 5:39 am)

If you have no need for a 3rd row, then why not the Suburu Forrester or some other station wagon?
#141 of 803
Re: compared them at the auto show [bobw3] by conwelpic
May 15, 2007 (3:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (May 15, 2007 6:40 am)

did check out the Subaru Forester at the same auto show, not bad but was really turned off by the fact that the door windows have no frame - not a very secure feature. They are also $5000 more than the Rondo EX 4-cylinder. Ford Focus has dropped their wagon. Too bad we don't have the selection in MPV's that they have in the UK.
There is a good under floor storage area on the Rondo. When you compare it feature for feature and the price you pay, it takes some beating - but appreciate any feedback as I won't be making a move till the 2008 models arrive.
#142 of 803
Re: compared them at the auto show [bobw3] by csandste
May 16, 2007 (12:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (May 15, 2007 6:40 am)

I looked closely at the Forester before buying a Malibu Maxx. I looked at the Rondo before buying my wife an Optima.
 
IMHO, the Optima is a newer and more enjoyable package than the Forester, although I liked both vehicles.
#143 of 803
Re: compared them at the auto show [csandste] by conwelpic
May 16, 2007 (7:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: csandste (May 16, 2007 12:24 am)

At first I didn't know what a Optima was but did some checking and its called the Magentis here in Canada. Nice vehicle but no good to me, as I need the versatility of a hatchback design. We've owned wagons, hatchbacks and sedans in the past and prefer the wagon/hatchback design the best. We have a large dog - Golden Retriever and our current sedan is not very good for "dog travel".
#144 of 803
Re: compared them at the auto show [csandste] by rwm2
May 16, 2007 (12:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: csandste (May 16, 2007 12:24 am)

In my opinion, Foresters are too small inside. The rear seat feels cramped. The Rondo is four inches wider than the Forester. Compared to the Rondo, the only thing going for the Forester is AWD.
#145 of 803
Re: compared them at the auto show [rwm2] by prulex
Jun 04, 2007 (8:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: rwm2 (May 16, 2007 12:16 pm)

I would argue that the Forester has more than just it's fantastic AWD system going for it. How about suspension, brakes, fit and finish, engine, and proven Subaru quality? Kia is definitely and up-and-comer, but I don't think it can be put in the category of Subaru just yet.
#146 of 803
Re: compared them at the auto show [prulex] by arumage
Jun 04, 2007 (8:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: prulex (Jun 04, 2007 8:14 am)

All those things are nice, but if you can't fit in the vehicle, what good are they to you? I didn't fit in the Forester. I had to spread my legs apart to keep my knees from hitting the front seat when sitting in the rear. My head also touches the ceiling in the 2nd row. I fit like a glove in the Rondo, even with the driver's seat all the way back.
#147 of 803
Re: compared them at the auto show [prulex] by rwm2
Jun 04, 2007 (4:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: prulex (Jun 04, 2007 8:14 am)

The category of Subaru? Check this out:
 
http://www.strategicvision.com/auto_segmentwinners.php?year=2007&award=TQA&seg=19

Messages Page 15 of 81
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
81
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement