Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Vans & Minivans Mazda Mazda5 Mazda 5 vs Kia Rondo
806 messages, Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 2:38 PM
You are in the Mazda Mazda5 Forum. Your Host is Karens
|
Replying to: zbx (Feb 21, 2007 5:54 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: bren (Feb 21, 2007 3:23 pm) I hadn't even really considered it because it was Kia (after owning Subarus, Volvos, Chryslers and Toyotas I considered Kia a step backward) but after taking an extended test drive, the Rondo grew on me. The interior fit and finish was way better than what I expected. It felt similar to the Volvo V40 I previously owned in terms of ride and interior quality and I loved that car. The dealer didn't have any EXV6 models but found one for me to test drive the next day. The EXV6 was really sharp in leather and a tad smoother but I didn't think the difference in engine was all that great. I ended up buying the LX with the 3rd row and convenience package and find myself making every excuse imagineable to drive it because I enjoy driving it. I usually suffer from buyer's remorse but not this time. The Rondo was exactly what I needed (6-7 seats, good gas mileage, safety features, practical value) but surprised me with the added bonuses of being fun to drive and well appointed. If you absolutely don't need the third row, there are more options but if it's a choice between the Mazda5 and the Rondo, I vote Rondo hands down. |
|
|
I was able to check out the M5 and Rondo at the Toronto Auto Show but found the Rondo more to my liking. On the M5 I did not like the rear sliding doors or the black only interior (felt too enclosed), also did not like the rear storage area as it was not a solid floor with the seats flat (we have a golden retriever and could step in the gaps); not as much underfloor storage as the Rondo. Had no use for the third seating and preferred the second seater to be for three across if required. There is also much more standard features on the Rondo (comparing it to the Rondo EX L4 model); more storage with the seats down; greater leg and headroom; better fuel mileage. The Rondo definitely the clear winner. It will be interesting to see how the sales compare as the year progresses as the M5 has had quite a head start.
|
|
|
Here's a Canadian comparison article. I think the author said in a prior article that he bought a Rondo, so his conclusions may be influenced by that, but good press is good press: http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/driving/story.html?id=fa1e4465-f7b5-47f4- -8c2e-4e68d95fd6f9 |
|
|
Replying to: conwelpic (Apr 17, 2007 5:39 am) |
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (May 15, 2007 6:40 am) There is a good under floor storage area on the Rondo. When you compare it feature for feature and the price you pay, it takes some beating - but appreciate any feedback as I won't be making a move till the 2008 models arrive. |
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (May 15, 2007 6:40 am) IMHO, the Optima is a newer and more enjoyable package than the Forester, although I liked both vehicles.
|
|
|
Replying to: csandste (May 16, 2007 12:24 am) |
|
|
Replying to: csandste (May 16, 2007 12:24 am)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Vans & Minivans Mazda Mazda5 Mazda 5 vs Kia Rondo
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Mazda MAZDA5
2009 Kia Rondo
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
