Sign In Join 



Can Chrysler Turn It Around in Bankruptcy?

464 messages,  Last post on Oct 02, 2009 at 2:05 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Chrysler


Messages Page 4 of 47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
47
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#31 of 464
Here's one step in the wrong direction... by andre1969
Dec 26, 2006 (12:03 pm)
Reply
I just found out that for 2007, Chrysler's offering a stripper version of the Charger with the 2.7/4-speed automatic, and no ABS. For 2006, the base Charger had a 3.5/5-speed, and ABS standard.
 
Now there was a fleet/rental edition of the 2006 Charger that only had the 2.7/4-speed, but it was kept out of the public eye for the most part.
 
Now they do offer the 3.5/5-speed/abs as a bundle for like $1,000 on the base Charger, or you can get the SXT package, which includes that stuff and some other goodies. Still, the whole thing reeks of cost cutting to me, and I think is only going to serve to cheapen the name. IMO it's a hark back to the late 70's/early 80's when they were putting slant sixes in St. Regises and Miradas.
 
Oh, and it looks like they also discontinued my favorite color, "Magnesium". Damn you, DCX. Damn you all to hell!! (sorry, I caught "Planet of the Apes" on tv over the weekend )
#32 of 464
What's wrong with the Merc 3.0-liter BLUETEC diesel? by hwyhobo
Dec 29, 2006 (11:54 pm)
Reply
I just read this line in the Nassau announcement:
 
Nassau is powered by a 6.1-liter HEMI and runs to 60 mph in five seconds.
 
Nassau looks like a beautiful car, but with a plethora of gas-sucking Hemi-powered cars already, why won't Chrysler introduce a good-looking car like Nassau with a fuel-efficient powerplant like the BLUETEC? I don't get it.
#33 of 464
Re: What's wrong with the Merc 3.0-liter BLUETEC diesel? [hwyhobo] by rockylee
Dec 30, 2006 (8:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: hwyhobo (Dec 29, 2006 11:54 pm)

Agree......What would be so hard to make a more powerful BLUETEC diesel to up the performance ?????
 
The best diesel that comes to mind is the V10 one that VW makes. Now that's a diesel I'd like to own.
 
Rocky
#34 of 464
Re: What's wrong with the Merc 3.0-liter BLUETEC diesel? [rockylee] by hwyhobo
Dec 30, 2006 (11:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: rockylee (Dec 30, 2006 8:42 am)

Actually, I would gladly go with the standard BLUETEC. I don't need higher performance in a car like that. 388 ft-lbs of torque is more than enough to propel Nassau, and 208 hp is nothing to sneeze at, either. With the Mercedes E-Class the BLUETEC engine is projected to do 26 mpg city and 37 mpg highway - what a shocking difference from the abominable 14/20 for the Chrysler 300 with the currently proposed for Nassau 6.1l engine.
 
I swear, someone should help Chrysler execs pull their heads out of their posteriors and notice that gas is no longer 85¢ per gallon.
#35 of 464
Re: What's wrong with the Merc 3.0-liter BLUETEC diesel? [hwyhobo] by rockylee
Dec 30, 2006 (11:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: hwyhobo (Dec 30, 2006 11:09 am)

I wished they would make it a option at least. However I'd rather sacrifice the extra mileage for the extra power. If the diesel produced another 100 hp and 120 lbs of tq I'd maybe would consider a BLUETEC diesel.
 
But hey that's me.
 
Rocky
#36 of 464
Re: What's wrong with the Merc 3.0-liter BLUETEC diesel? [rockylee] by british_rover
Dec 30, 2006 (11:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: rockylee (Dec 30, 2006 11:17 am)

To get that kind of power out of that little 3.0 liter you would have to run so much boost that longevity would be compromised.
 
You need another liter or so of displacment to get 300 plus reliable HP out of a diesel like that.
 
Remember HP is a function of torque and RPM and while diesels make stupid amounts of torque they can't rev very much.
 
Rovers 3.6 liter TDV8 Makes a little under 300 hp. You need about 4.0 liters to make 300 plus hp.
#37 of 464
Re: What's wrong with the Merc 3.0-liter BLUETEC diesel? [british_rover] by rockylee
Dec 30, 2006 (11:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: british_rover (Dec 30, 2006 11:28 am)

Well that's where Rover shines and DCX falls IMHO.
 
Rocky
#38 of 464
Re: What's wrong with the Merc 3.0-liter BLUETEC diesel? [hwyhobo] by harrychezt
Jan 02, 2007 (10:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hwyhobo (Dec 29, 2006 11:54 pm)

http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z6933/default.aspx
 
This was rumored to be what is now the new Sebring( except thsi was RWD.... and Sebring is FWD. Many blogs posted it as RWD, but said it would become FWD, and new engines, which the Sebring has, Except The Styling is nothing like this excellent concept).
 
I do not trust many concepts. Lot of makers show things, and water 'em down, or radically change their designs(too much).
take care/not offense
#39 of 464
. by anythngbutgm
Jan 04, 2007 (8:20 am)
Reply
Chrysler appears to be still on top of its game when it comes to minivans...
 
http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/01/04/2008-chrysler-town-country-voyager-unveil- ed/
 
Impressive. I can see why GM and Ford bailed out of the market. Neither could hold a candle to the Minvan masters.
#40 of 464
Re: . [anythngbutgm] by hwyhobo
Jan 04, 2007 (10:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: anythngbutgm (Jan 04, 2007 8:20 am)

It better be darned good. Check this article on the current state of the minivan market:
 
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070103/FREE/70102005/1024/L- ATESTNEWS

Messages Page 4 of 47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
47
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement