Sign In Join 



Can Chrysler Turn It Around in Bankruptcy?

464 messages,  Last post on Oct 02, 2009 at 2:05 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Chrysler


Messages Page 18 of 47
1
...
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
...
47
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#164 of 464
Re: I would never consider a Nissan (dvsutton) [nippononly] by dtownfb
Sep 22, 2008 (6:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Sep 22, 2008 11:52 am)

Despite the disparaging remarks above concerning the readiness of Chinese cars to come to the U.S. market, I would say it will be two years or less before the first ones arrive, and Cerberus would do well to make agreements to make sales and manufacturing deals with them (and more with the Italians too) to use the existing plants and dealer network
 
Hate to disagree with you but I don't see anything that suggests the cars from China will be ready in a year or two. More importantly, I don't see Cerebus owning Chrysler for very long. LIke another poster mentioned, I don't think Cerebus understood what they were getting. The cupboard was bare after Daimler was done with them.
 
Nissan is an established company with two decent small cars, Versa and Sentra. Folks would be more receptive to buying a re-badged Nissan than a car form China.
#165 of 464
from the wild and wacky file... by nippononly
Sep 23, 2008 (8:39 am)
Reply
...comes news that Chrysler is in talks with Lotus to mass-produce a car very similar to Tesla's ($100K) electric sports car, which is based on the Elise??!!
 
http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080923/ANA02/809239991/1186- /emailblast02&refsect=emailblast02
 
Frank Klegon, Chrysler executive vice president of product development, told Automotive News this morning that the sports car -- called the Dodge EV -- would go from 0 to 60 mph in under five seconds.
 
That automaker also is considering production of Chrysler Town & Country and Jeep Wrangler electric vehicles. The company wants to put one of the three electric vehicles on the market by the end of 2010.

 
Chrysler apparently figures 50% of all cars on the road will be electric by 2020. I say pshaw to that notion and the idea that Chrysler will beat GM to market with an electric car (and van, and Jeep), even as GM struggles to remain on target for late 2010 with the Volt, which has a smaller electric-only range.
 
Will Chrysler still be in business in 2010?
#166 of 464
Re: from the wild and wacky file... [nippononly] by mickeyrom
Sep 23, 2008 (11:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Sep 23, 2008 8:39 am)

Right...just what we need ...a $100,000 Dodge. I'm afraid my favorite badge is about to go under for the third time.What possible excuse can they have for not producing a single legitimate high mileage economy car?
#167 of 464
Gluttons for punishment... by fezo
Sep 24, 2008 (12:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mickeyrom (Sep 23, 2008 11:26 am)

Daimler in talks to sell the rest of Chrysler. To Cerberus! What the heck are they thinking??!?
#168 of 464
Re: Gluttons for punishment... [fezo] by nippononly
Sep 24, 2008 (12:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Sep 24, 2008 12:05 pm)

That they want to be rid of them for good?
#169 of 464
Re: Gluttons for punishment... [nippononly] by fezo
Sep 24, 2008 (12:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Sep 24, 2008 12:10 pm)

This makes sense if you are Daimler for exactly that reason. My question is what the heck is in this for Cerberus? I just can't believe they can keep Chrysler running until new product hits the pipeline. I'd love to be proven wrong. Especially if they build cars that somehow seem like Chryslers again. Been a long time.
#170 of 464
Re: Gluttons for punishment... [nippononly] (fezo) by hpmctorque
Sep 24, 2008 (5:34 pm)
Reply
Yeah, this has me very puzzled too. You'd think that if Cerberus wanted to invest additional money into Chrysler it would be used to ride out this difficult period, until new product can be introduced. It could also be invested in product, which is one area where Chrysler currently falls short.
 
The devil must surely be in the details on this one, because on the surface it defies logic.
#171 of 464
To add fuel to the fire... by andre1969
Sep 24, 2008 (5:38 pm)
Reply
I heard that Cerberus is against the gov't bailout of the domestic automakers. Evidently, they have enough cash reserves to ride it out, where Ford and GM don't. At least, according to my roommate, who works for a company that's ultimately affiliated with them, somehow. He works for a restaurant named Smokey Bones, but somehow qualifies for employee pricing on any new Chrysler product.
#172 of 464
Re: Gluttons for punishment... [nippononly] (fezo) [hpmctorque] by steve_ HOST
Sep 24, 2008 (5:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Sep 24, 2008 5:34 pm)

Cerberus keeps saying Chrysler isn't up for sale, but getting completely divorced from Daimler could make the whole package a bit more attractive to some other company. Say, one that competes hard with them. VW perhaps?
#173 of 464
Re: To add fuel to the fire... [andre1969] by dtownfb
Sep 24, 2008 (5:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Sep 24, 2008 5:38 pm)

Interesting. I just heard a report that the House approved the $25 billion dollar "loan" to the Detroit automakers. I thought this bailout was critical for Chrysler to release their electric cars in 2010 as well.

Messages Page 18 of 47
1
...
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
...
47
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement