Sign In Join 



2008-2009 Chevrolet Malibu

1301 messages,  Last post on Nov 24, 2009 at 8:22 AM

You are in the Chevrolet Malibu Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet, Chevrolet Malibu, Automotive News, Sedan


Messages Page 2 of 131
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
131
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#7 of 1301
Re: 2008 malibu [rvoth] by jaxs1
Nov 14, 2006 (6:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rvoth (Nov 14, 2006 6:09 pm)

Unless that's Canadian mileage, it doesn't make sense.
The Saturn Aura gets pretty mediocre mileage with that same drive train. Worse than an Impala with standard engine and 4-speed automatic.
You shouldn't need to be forced to take the 4 cylinder 2008 Malibu if you want over 30 MPG highway on regular gas and US calibrated gallons when an Impala does better than that.
#8 of 1301
Re: 2008 malibu [jaxs1] by rvoth
Nov 15, 2006 (8:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jaxs1 (Nov 14, 2006 6:16 pm)

Yes that's Canadian mileage from GM CANADA website.
 Oh ya , us Canadians get better mpg because an Imperial gallon is 4.54 liters compared to 3.79 liter for an American gallon. So i go farther on a gallon of fuel.
 
 A 4 cylinder 2008 malibu would be a dog on power, gutless.Yes the 3.6 liter burns regular gas not premium! Check out what Honda 4 cylinder and V-6 engines get for mileage about the same as the 3.6 liter GM.
#9 of 1301
The Interior by groovypippin
Nov 21, 2006 (10:10 am)
Reply
GM has released a shot of the new Malibu's interior ahead of the NAIAS next month.
 
link title
 
Discuss
#10 of 1301
Re: The Interior [groovypippin] by jaxs1
Nov 21, 2006 (8:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: groovypippin (Nov 21, 2006 10:10 am)

Looks OK. The photo is a bad angle and not in a color most people are going to get (tan or gray).
#11 of 1301
Re: 2008 malibu [rvoth] by carguytx
Nov 22, 2006 (7:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: rvoth (Nov 15, 2006 8:01 pm)

It depends on which 4 cylinder as to whether it will be a dog. If its the 2.4 Ecotec at around 170hp, that should make for a better experience. GM must offer a credible 4 cylinder engine package to appease budget conscious shoppers that will often turn to the Japanese offerings. Toyota and Honda 4 cylinders dont make you feel that you stepped down. Their engines are smooth and refined. There is no reason that GM can't deliver a great 4 cylinder experience. They have the know-how, just need to do it.
#12 of 1301
Re: 2008 malibu [carguytx] by jaxs1
Nov 22, 2006 (6:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: carguytx (Nov 22, 2006 7:25 am)

The 170HP 4 cylinder needs premium gas to run properly. The lower 4 cylinder is too underpowered and crude for this size and class of car and the 3.6 liter engine gets worse fuel economy than a base Impala.
If there isn't a more economical V6 than the 3.6 available, it will be pretty bad.
#13 of 1301
Re: The Interior [groovypippin] by kurtamaxxxguy
Nov 24, 2006 (5:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: groovypippin (Nov 21, 2006 10:10 am)

It actually looks better than the Saturn Auras, and doesn't have the Aura's chrome trim (which fits badly and looks cheap in the Auras I've seen).
 
Yet a lot of the interior (and exterior windows, etc.) feel like a clone of the Aura - badge engineering lives again!
#14 of 1301
engine by 1487
Nov 27, 2006 (2:44 pm)
Reply
"M must offer a credible 4 cylinder engine package to appease budget conscious shoppers that will often turn to the Japanese offerings. Toyota and Honda 4 cylinders dont make you feel that you stepped down. Their engines are smooth and refined."
 
Neither of GM's ecotecs is unrefined. The ecotec was revised when the Cobalt came out in 2004 to run more quietly and by all reports the measures were effective. The Malibu will have the 2.4L that is currently in the G6 making 169hp. The real question is whether or not it will be offered with a 6 speed auto. I would guess it wont be. I am also doubting that the 3.6L will be the uplevel engine due to production contraints. I would think the 3.9L will be coupled with a 6 speed auto.
 
I like that interior picture a lot. It looks very good.
#15 of 1301
Re: engine [1487] by jaxs1
Nov 27, 2006 (5:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 1487 (Nov 27, 2006 2:44 pm)

Well, if the 4 cylinder was really smooth, ran on regular, they put in loads of sound insulation and it had a 6-speed automatic, it would be something to consider and would be extremely competitive with decent performance, great gas mileage and a quiet highway ride.
I'm sure it won't happen. They don't have a 5-speed automatic available and they won't use a 6-speed, so that leaves little choice.
Expect a buzzy 4 cylinder with a cheap 4-speed automatic since they will try to make it a price-leader that most people will find unacceptable and want to upgrade from.
#16 of 1301
Re: engine [jaxs1] by 1487
Nov 28, 2006 (8:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: jaxs1 (Nov 27, 2006 5:20 pm)

Its obvious you are clueless in terms of the ecotec. It is not loud or thrashy or anything else like that. It is refined and the press acknowldges it's one of the better four cylinders on the market. Why would the engine get unrefined for the Malibu if it's refined in the Cobalt and G6? That makes no sense. As for mileage, the G6 gest 23/23 with a 4 speed auto so that is likely what you can expect from the 2008 Malibu. Every epsilon based car has a quiet ride and this one will be no exception. Have you bothered to read any reviews of the Aura? The Malibu will be very similar except for styling and powertrain.

Messages Page 2 of 131
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
131
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement