Sign In Join 



2008-2009 Chevrolet Malibu

1301 messages,  Last post on Nov 24, 2009 at 8:22 AM

You are in the Chevrolet Malibu Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet, Chevrolet Malibu, Automotive News, Sedan


Messages Page 2 of 131
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
131
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4 of 1301
Re: 2008 malibu [rvoth] by jaxs1
Nov 13, 2006 (7:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rvoth (Nov 13, 2006 8:04 am)

The 3.6 sounds like an optional high-power engine. I wonder what the gas mileage will be like and if the standard engine will be be so inadequate (crude 4 cylinder with 4-speed automatic etc.) that you feel compelled to upgrade to the 3.6?
#5 of 1301
Re: 2008 malibu [jaxs1] by rockylee
Nov 13, 2006 (9:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jaxs1 (Nov 13, 2006 7:35 pm)

If they put in the echotec 4 cylinder it's not a crude engine. However they need to add the 6-speed automatic to really make it efficient. Due to the limited availability of the 6-speed, I'm sure the 4-speed will be the base tranny for at least a few years. I hope i'm wrong. I can't wait to see interior photo's of this new car.
 
Rocky
#6 of 1301
Re: 2008 malibu [jaxs1] by rvoth
Nov 14, 2006 (6:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jaxs1 (Nov 13, 2006 7:35 pm)

On GM site it posts the CTS cadillac 3.6 liter with the six speed trans gets 21 city,36 hwy and 26 combined. Compared with 07 malibu gets 26/42/31 combined MPG. So they are giving up mileage for horsepower. Mileage is very similar to the 3.9 liter v-6 in the SS Malibu.
#7 of 1301
Re: 2008 malibu [rvoth] by jaxs1
Nov 14, 2006 (6:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rvoth (Nov 14, 2006 6:09 pm)

Unless that's Canadian mileage, it doesn't make sense.
The Saturn Aura gets pretty mediocre mileage with that same drive train. Worse than an Impala with standard engine and 4-speed automatic.
You shouldn't need to be forced to take the 4 cylinder 2008 Malibu if you want over 30 MPG highway on regular gas and US calibrated gallons when an Impala does better than that.
#8 of 1301
Re: 2008 malibu [jaxs1] by rvoth
Nov 15, 2006 (8:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jaxs1 (Nov 14, 2006 6:16 pm)

Yes that's Canadian mileage from GM CANADA website.
 Oh ya , us Canadians get better mpg because an Imperial gallon is 4.54 liters compared to 3.79 liter for an American gallon. So i go farther on a gallon of fuel.
 
 A 4 cylinder 2008 malibu would be a dog on power, gutless.Yes the 3.6 liter burns regular gas not premium! Check out what Honda 4 cylinder and V-6 engines get for mileage about the same as the 3.6 liter GM.
#9 of 1301
The Interior by groovypippin
Nov 21, 2006 (10:10 am)
Reply
GM has released a shot of the new Malibu's interior ahead of the NAIAS next month.
 
link title
 
Discuss
#10 of 1301
Re: The Interior [groovypippin] by jaxs1
Nov 21, 2006 (8:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: groovypippin (Nov 21, 2006 10:10 am)

Looks OK. The photo is a bad angle and not in a color most people are going to get (tan or gray).
#11 of 1301
Re: 2008 malibu [rvoth] by carguytx
Nov 22, 2006 (7:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: rvoth (Nov 15, 2006 8:01 pm)

It depends on which 4 cylinder as to whether it will be a dog. If its the 2.4 Ecotec at around 170hp, that should make for a better experience. GM must offer a credible 4 cylinder engine package to appease budget conscious shoppers that will often turn to the Japanese offerings. Toyota and Honda 4 cylinders dont make you feel that you stepped down. Their engines are smooth and refined. There is no reason that GM can't deliver a great 4 cylinder experience. They have the know-how, just need to do it.
#12 of 1301
Re: 2008 malibu [carguytx] by jaxs1
Nov 22, 2006 (6:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: carguytx (Nov 22, 2006 7:25 am)

The 170HP 4 cylinder needs premium gas to run properly. The lower 4 cylinder is too underpowered and crude for this size and class of car and the 3.6 liter engine gets worse fuel economy than a base Impala.
If there isn't a more economical V6 than the 3.6 available, it will be pretty bad.
#13 of 1301
Re: The Interior [groovypippin] by kurtamaxxxguy
Nov 24, 2006 (5:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: groovypippin (Nov 21, 2006 10:10 am)

It actually looks better than the Saturn Auras, and doesn't have the Aura's chrome trim (which fits badly and looks cheap in the Auras I've seen).
 
Yet a lot of the interior (and exterior windows, etc.) feel like a clone of the Aura - badge engineering lives again!

Messages Page 2 of 131
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
131
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement