Sign In Join 



2008-2009 Chevrolet Malibu

1285 messages,  Last post on Nov 04, 2009 at 6:58 AM

You are in the Chevrolet Malibu Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet, Chevrolet Malibu, Automotive News, Sedan


Messages Page 114 of 129
1
...
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
...
129
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1131 of 1285
Re: Annoying Shrieking Brakes [ronbo10] by gmfornow3
Oct 24, 2008 (8:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: ronbo10 (Oct 22, 2008 7:46 am)

I think bandit08 mentions a common GM issue with rotors. Two GM cars of mine purchased new (1997 Pontiac Grand Am -4cyl. and 2002 Chevy Monte Carol 3.4L) both had warped rotors around 15,000 miles and again at 36,000 miles. On both cars the repairs were the same. They replaced the rotors the first time, and the second time they turned the rotors, both under warranty. What is strange is that both cars had no rotor warping roblems since then, and I drove both these cars to over 120,000 miles, with 85% highway miles.
 
I heard that after market rotors are made better, but since these cars were under warranty for me, I did not need to consider that option.
 
My current car is the 2008 Malibu 2LT with the V-6. No brake issues, but I only have 6,700 miles so far.
#1132 of 1285
2009 New Malibu LT by guy16
Aug 02, 2008 (3:29 pm)
Reply
I just brought home a beautiful black 2009 Malibu LT two days ago. Besides a small compartment door not opening properly and a clip in the trunk breaking off and having to be replaced, we were totally thrilled with the car. However, today as I went to shift it into park and shut the car off, the car stopped dead and began to roll backwards. As I tried to turn it back on, I noticed that the shift was still registering in the drive position instead of the park, even though the shifter handle was is park. It would not turn on, or shift out of drive, even though it was off and could not turn on. I was really in a pickle. Come to find out, the shifting cable was extremely loose. A clamp or something was broken or missing. The car was towed back to the dealer. I am now driving a rental car until Monday. Is this anything to worry about or just a weird fluke? Thanks for your tips.
#1133 of 1285
Re: 2009 New Malibu LT [guy16] by topgun7
Aug 27, 2008 (9:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: guy16 (Aug 02, 2008 3:29 pm)

Sorry to hear your problem.. What is the resolution? did the dealre fix your problem? What is new for 09 Malibu? I heard that the 4 cylinder come with 6 sp auto now. Is that true...
#1134 of 1285
2009 Malibu LTZ 4 cylinder by crosbys3
Oct 17, 2008 (9:46 pm)
Reply
Hello all,,,,,, i ordered mine back in July. Black granite metallic LTZ 4 cyl 6 speed auto, rear power pkg got the rear window shade which is pretty neat when parked in the sun. I can honestly say i love this car plenty of power in the 4 cylinder you really get use of the 6 speed trans at highway speeds. When im traveling at 65-70 mph the tach is under 2000. We have the Brick- Ebony leather inside looks so nice have gotten so many compliments on the look of the car. Also very quite just changed the oil at 2500 miles to put Mobil 1 driver information said oil life was at 80 % but i wanted to change it anyway. One more comment about the oil filter it is so easy to change the nut on the top of the filter housing is either 33mm or 1 1/4 short socket quick and easy change. If you are thinking about this car i would say go for it. But hey i like the Malibu i still have a 99 with 195,000 miles that is running and rides like a top so that was another reason for the Malibu.
#1135 of 1285
Re: 2009 Malibu LTZ 4 cylinder [crosbys3] by phil53
Oct 22, 2008 (5:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: crosbys3 (Oct 17, 2008 9:46 pm)

I bought almost the same exact car, except that mine has the cocoa/cashmere interior. I too changed to Mobil 1 - at 1900 miles. The only problem I've had with mine to date is the On Star. It just beeps when I try to activate it. The dealership is still waiting to hear from tech support. Fortunately, the Bluetooth works and I probably won't renew the On Star when the free period expires any way. So I'm not too upset.
My biggest complaint comes with the fuel mileage - or lack thereof, which I have discussed in the appropriate thread elsewhere.
Having owned the car for about 5 weeks now, I do have a list of things I would change about the car.
The 6 speed automatic hunts - a lot. And, when pressed suddenly, it takes too long to downshift and get underway - worse than any turbo lag I've ever experienced. I tried shifting manually yesterday on my way into work and it seemed more driveable (although still a bit slow to shift). But I think GM could have done a much better job on the programming.
The DIC has far too many pages for one button. If they had used the same stalks on the new Malibu that has been in the GM parts bin for years (and the one used on both my Avalanche and my Corvette), it would have freed up those extra buttons so that those pages could have been divided into different menus (again, like on my Avalanche and my Corvette). As it is, if you're reading the instant fuel mileage and you want to see the average, you have to page all the way through the various pages to get back there.
The lumbar support could use more adjustment. That's my way of saying I need more lumbar support than this vehicle currently has. An electronically adjustable version such as I have on the Avalanche would be greatly appreciated.
One thing that was almost a deal breaker for us was the fact that the back seat does not fold flat. I know they were trying to avoid having to lift the seat bottom up before folding the seat back down, but I would do that to get the flat load floor. Plus, I know the material on the back of the seat is intended for protection, but I would prefer a smoother surface. The trunk mat is so nice; the back of the seat is so tacky. And you can't set something on it without it sliding back.
I'm also disappointed that they chose to remove the adjustable pedals for 2009. My wife is quite a bit shorter than me and that is a future she would find useful.
The other complaint I have is the fact that the temperature can only be viewed with the odometer. I would prefer a separate read-out somewhere so that it is always visible. Similarly, when in manual mode, it defaults to one of the trip odometers as the other bit of information displayed. That's an odd pairing; a combination that I can think of no rationale to support. I would have combined it with the instant fuel mileage read-out.
While I'm discussing the instrument panel, that's one more thing I'd change. It's kind of neat to look at initially. Eventually, though, it's just flashy and not as functional as it could be. I'd prefer nice white on black or black on white gauges with red pointers and clear hash marks. They could also add a voltmeter and oil pressure guage between the top and bottom of the fuel and temperature guauges. A larger tach would be nice for those times when driving in manual mode.
Those are just my observations to date. Some would cost GM a little more and others would have cost them hardly anything - or nothing at all.
#1136 of 1285
Re: 2009 Malibu LTZ 4 cylinder [phil53] by guss
Oct 24, 2008 (4:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: phil53 (Oct 22, 2008 5:37 pm)

I agree that there are too many pages on the dic. The 2 of the 10 that I use mostly are the temperature and the mpg' s. I find that I just count four button pushes to get to the mpgs and 6 button pushes to get back to the temperature.
 
With a base 10 system maybe this is Chevy's way to get us to think metric.
#1137 of 1285
Re: [rik4] by vanman1
Oct 24, 2008 (12:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rik4 (Oct 23, 2008 6:13 pm)

0% for 60 is on 2008's only. 2009's have 0.9% for 60 for people with good credit. If you don't, you will pay more. Just common sense.
 
Check it..
 
http://www.gm.ca/gm/english/corporate/offers/clearance/overview?adv=82228
#1138 of 1285
[guss] by vanman1
Oct 24, 2008 (12:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: guss (Oct 24, 2008 4:01 am)

I agree with you on the radio controls, they are on the wrong side and they are awkward. Drives me crazy but I am getting used to them slowly.
 
I also think the heat dial in the middle needs a little grip. It was very cool here this morning and my finger slipped turning it to hot.
 
Minor details, GM could make the changes with little cost I'm sure!
#1139 of 1285
Re: 2009 New Malibu LT [guy16] by jerrywimer
Oct 27, 2008 (4:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: guy16 (Aug 02, 2008 3:29 pm)

It's a fluke. Yours is the first report of any issue with the trans on these cars that I've read, other than some folks not liking the shift logic (hard downshifts, slow downshifts, etc.).
#1140 of 1285
Re: 2009 Malibu LTZ 4 cylinder [phil53] by jerrywimer
Oct 27, 2008 (4:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: phil53 (Oct 22, 2008 5:37 pm)

Interesting list of observations. I can't say I agree with them all, but at least with some of them. Be happy you get to see anything other than the gear selected when you're in manumatic mode, my 08 LTZ doesn't. I would rather have had the gear display be on a separate line (maybe above the regular DIC readout), and whatever you pick from the DIC display remain unchanged.

Messages Page 114 of 129
1
...
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
...
129
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement