68 messages,
Last post on Aug 11, 2007 at 8:23 PM
You are in the
Honda Accord Forum.
What is this discussion about?
Honda Accord, Sedan
#19 of 68 Re: Add me to the stick side [exshoman]
by elroy5
Nov 09, 2006 (3:09 pm)
Especially on the lower powered cars, the stick makes such a big difference in make use of all available power.
I have the V6, so I'm not exactly lacking power. I can do without the extra hp a manual would have. I see an automatic as a luxury, because it makes driving so much easier and relaxed. If I had an S2000 that would be a different story.
Nov 09, 2006 (3:44 pm)
Of course if you have a stick you don't need the power of the V-6.
The 4-cyl with stick is also amazingly efficient. My brother has one (I don't - yet) and he averages nearly 38 mpg for his commute - mostly highway with some city, and can get over 40 mpg pure highway driving.
I hope Honda keeps offering the stick on all trims with the new generation.
#21 of 68 Re: - [dudleyr]
by elroy5
Nov 09, 2006 (3:57 pm)
The 4-cyl Accord with any transmission will not hang with my V6
. I get 33mpg on the highway doing 80mph, so that's good enough for me.
#22 of 68 Re: Add me to the stick side [elroy5]
by exshoman
Nov 09, 2006 (7:25 pm)
True, with the 6, you don't need a manual to have a good amount of power. Heck, even with the 4 an automatic is sprightly enough for most folks.
I think your last sentence though sums up some of the difference between folks who want an automatic ("easier and relaxed") vs folks who would prefer a manual (I'll say "spirited and involved").
BTW, if this car had been primarily for me instead of my wife, I would have gotten the V6 w/6speed. A wolf in sheep's clothing, or what is fondly known as a Q-ship.
#23 of 68 Re: Add me to the stick side [exshoman]
by elroy5
Nov 09, 2006 (9:55 pm)
BTW, if this car had been primarily for me instead of my wife, I would have gotten the V6 w/6speed. A wolf in sheep's clothing, or what is fondly known as a Q-ship.
I'm sure the V6 6speed is a fun car to drive. Of course I would have a hard time controlling my fun, and that would probably mean "speeding tickets". So maybe I'm better off without a 6speed.
#24 of 68 Re: Manual or Auto [kingr]
by wcskjb
Nov 27, 2006 (11:56 am)
Couple more items on manual vs. auto from a huge manual fan:
1. Notice the number of complaints here from Accord AT owners? Even adjusting for the relative numbers, manual complaints are next to nil.
2. My college kid has a Accord LX manual. No one borrows his car for the trek to local watering hole. A big comfort to me.
3. Police will tell you they hardly ever see a stolen manual car except high-end sports cars. Don't know whether manuals get an insurance premium break in cities, but they should.
#25 of 68 Re: Manual or Auto [wcskjb]
by ezshift5
Nov 28, 2006 (7:37 am)
.... Police will tell you they hardly ever see a stolen manual car except high-end sports cars.
....interesting post. I think you've just made my day.
..ez..
#26 of 68 Re: Manual or Auto [ezshift5]
by tallman1
Nov 28, 2006 (1:30 pm)
Yeah... maybe I'll give my insurance company a call. lol
#27 of 68 question about AT - Illumination light on shift control
by jet123456
Jun 27, 2007 (9:51 am)
I have a 2007 honda accord ex-L v6 with AT. On the shift control itself I just noticed that at night with lights on - there is no illumination on the shifting device to make it easier to see you move from N to R to D etc. I know there is a indicator on the dashboard - but should those little indicators on the shift also light up? Just curious because mine do not. Thanks
#28 of 68 Re: Manual or Auto [wcskjb]
by falmouth
Jul 19, 2007 (4:39 am)
I also agree with this. I have a '96 EX sedan w/5 sp and it has 287K miles on it. Original clutch. Also have an 01 and just bought an 07 this week. All manuals and 4 cylinders. I have heard so many problems with the 7th Gen automatics that I'll stick with the 5 speed. The better contol of my car in snow and rain is also a plus. Traffic jams are the only time an automatic would be a plus.