Sign In Join 



Ford Freestyle Tires

160 messages,  Last post on Aug 04, 2009 at 12:14 PM

You are in the Ford Freestyle Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Ford Freestyle, Tires, Wheels, SUV


Messages Page 4 of 16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
16
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#31 of 160
New tires for the Freestyle by saabturboid
Dec 17, 2006 (6:12 am)
Reply
I had new tires installed on our AWD '05 Freestyle SEL. After 31,000 miles the stock 17" Continentals were very well worn. As many here may have noticed there is not a lot of choice in the 215/65/17 size. I opted for the Yokohama YK520. This H rated all-season tire is rated for 60,000 miles and according to the reviews does well in snow. This was a priority since I live in the north but didn't want true snow tires that I'd have to change out twice a year. I also wanted an H rated tire because they are of a higher construction quality than the S and T rated offerings.
 
We are about to embark on a 2,600 mile road-trip across the northern tier of the US and into the Rocky Mountains. I'm certain by the time we get back in a couple of weeks I'll be able to make a full review. So far the only difference I've noticed is the ride is a bit firmer than with the stock Continentals, but that is to be expected when moving from a T to an H rated tire.
#32 of 160
Re: New tires for the Freestyle [saabturboid] by yoyo123
Dec 21, 2006 (9:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: saabturboid (Dec 17, 2006 6:12 am)

I also got new tires for my Freestyle. Our Pirelli's lasted about 35k. Lots of highway driving and keeping them inflated. I did have one punture to close to the side, so I had one relatively new tire that was replaced.
 
I got the Goodyear Assurance ComforTread. Not a lot of choice in the 18" wheel size. It seemed to be the best value I could find in that size. I didn't want to go back to the Pirelli. I paid $125 per tire after shipping from TireRack. I highly recommend TireRack.
 
As for the tires, I am very happy with them. They are quiter than the Pirelli's and I haven't noticed any handling differences. According to the tests, they don't handle quite as well as the Pirelli's but their results were so close that it will be hard to notice in real world driving. The tires are warranty'd for 70000 miles. Yes, they have a "B" rating for temp, but I don't expect that to be an issue as I don't heat up my tires with the type of driving I do.
#33 of 160
35k out of Pirellis by mschmal
Dec 26, 2006 (9:07 am)
Reply
The 18 inch Pirellis that you replaces were speed rated tires, you did very very well to get the 35,000 miles out of them.
 
Mark.
 
Tirerack RULES!
#34 of 160
Review of the Yokohama YK520 by saabturboid
Jan 03, 2007 (10:18 am)
Reply
We are back with a fresh 2,600 miles on our 17" Yokohama YK520s that we recently installed on our Freestyle. We encountered lots of different types of weather so I feel I can do a proper review.
 
These tires have a 60,000 mile warranty and are H speed rated (up to 130mph). Because of the higher speed rating they have a stiffer sidewall and are more robust than the stock Continentals. This results in a more firm but not unpleasant ride. I have also noticed a slight decrease in gas mileage, about 1-2 mpg. I'm not sure how much of this is the tires and how much was the weather, speed, and how loaded our vehicle was.
 
In the snow they performed well, not as good as a true snow tire, but well enough to be passable especially with the Freestyles AWD. On the dry they handled very well and gave the Freestyle a more sporty feel than the stock tires. In wet conditions the tires gripped the road well and the tires were always quiet.
 
The only thing I was disappointed in was what seems to be poor ice traction. We encountered several areas of icy roads and I had very little traction. I can't say that the stock tires would have been any better since not much except true ice tires with a special compound work well on ice.
 
Overall I would recommend these tires for anyone looking for a 60,000 mile all-season type tire for their Freestyle. Cost was $108 each.
 
- Chad
#35 of 160
Re: Review of the Yokohama YK520 [saabturboid] by yoyo123
Jan 03, 2007 (10:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: saabturboid (Jan 03, 2007 10:18 am)

How did you get such a great price on them? Do you know if that is the difference between the 17" and 18" price? I priced out the YK520's and they were over $140 per tire. I went with the Goodyear ComforTread due to lower price. I am happy with my decision as they are better than the Pirelli's they replaced.
#36 of 160
Re: Review of the Yokohama YK520 [yoyo123] by coldcranker
Jan 19, 2007 (11:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: yoyo123 (Jan 03, 2007 10:34 am)

Go to a 17" size of 225/65-17 (instead of stock 215) and your choices go way up with more tread width, and they fit well. Try www.tirerack.com , for example.
#37 of 160
Tire ?'s by fordenvy
Mar 14, 2007 (5:36 pm)
Reply
Can you get MNS tires from the factory or only touring? because I want to get off the road in the snow when I go up hunting. Is touring good enough with the AWD to get off the road with?
#38 of 160
Re: Tire ?'s [fordenvy] by saabturboid
Mar 15, 2007 (10:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: fordenvy (Mar 14, 2007 5:36 pm)

The Freestyle is not an SUV and was not designed for offroad use. It was designed primarily as a people mover where 99% of people drive, on the road. It has very low ground clearance compared to an SUV, and the tire size is a bit odd so there aren't any real Mud and Snow tires available for it at all let alone from the factory. Most of the aftermarket offerings are oriented towards the street. Ford only offers one model dependent tire type. With the SE/SEL it is a Continental 17" street tire and with the Limited it is a Pirelli 18" street tire.
 
Whether or not the stock tires will work off road for you depends on what you mean. Is it a gravel road? Then fine. It is going to be rock crawling on big boulders and digging through deep mud. I don't think so.
#39 of 160
Re: Tire ?'s [saabturboid] by fordenvy
Mar 15, 2007 (9:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: saabturboid (Mar 15, 2007 10:31 am)

Thanks for the insight. I think I'll stick with my explorer, I just thought I'd look into something that rides better and gets better gas mileage, I guess thats not realistic for Ford standards to be able to get 2 for 1.
#40 of 160
Re: Tire ?'s [fordenvy] by saabturboid
Mar 16, 2007 (6:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: fordenvy (Mar 15, 2007 9:51 pm)

It isn't a Ford limitation but one of physics. A body-on-frame SUV with high ground clearance is what works best for off road use, but this design is not conducive to great fuel economy due to its weight and high drag coefficient. The Freestyle is made with a lighter unibody construction allowing it to be lighter and with lower ground clearance it has less drag both of which enable better gas mileage than your Explorer.

Messages Page 4 of 16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
16
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement