Sign In Join 



Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis: Real World MPG

43 messages,  Last post on Apr 20, 2009 at 3:19 PM

You are in the Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Grand Marquis, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Sedan


Messages Page 2 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4 of 43
Re: Cold Weather [jeff94vic] by euphonium
Dec 20, 2005 (10:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jeff94vic (Dec 20, 2005 6:55 am)

Perhaps it is a combination of:
1. Engine not completely warmed up.
 
2. Cold air reduces air pressure in tires, causing more of a drag.
 
3. "Winter" gasoline containing up to 10% methenal or some other adverse chemical that prevents fuel lines from freezing.
 
4. Have you installed a roof top ski rack or luggage carrier?
#5 of 43
Re: Cold Weather [jeff94vic] by turbo301
Dec 22, 2005 (4:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jeff94vic (Dec 20, 2005 6:55 am)

Indeed, I find that I'm losing about 5 mpg in the winter, too (from 26-28 down to 21-23 mpg). Note, too, that my tires are at 35 psi all around, I have no additional accessories, and my car has plenty of time to warm up (120 km per day). I always use Sunoco gas, which contains up to 10% ethanol year-round; 10% ethanol hurts fuel economy by about 2%, relative to regular fuel, but it is also an antifreeze, so I doubt that Sunoco adds much different to their gas in the winter. I do acknowledge, though, that most gasolines do feature special winter additives that hurt mileage.
 
I think that there are a few factors that explain poorer fuel economy in the winter. Longer warm-up times in the driveway, more power required from the engine to overcome cold tranny and differential fluids, and more wheel slippage all contribute to wasted gas. Add to this the extra drag of blowing snow (at least where I travel!), the extra weight on your car due to ice and slush, and you can see that winter is a recipe for poor economy. My car is noticeably lethargic when it is coated in ice after a big storm!
#6 of 43
air pressurer//tires by fscarano
Jan 27, 2006 (11:52 am)
Reply
I have read posts where people are running 35 psi in tires. My question is why? does this improve fuel economy? and give a smoother ride? Wondering why 35 psi and not the recommended 32 psi.
 
thank you
#7 of 43
Re: air pressurer//tires [fscarano] by shad
Jan 27, 2006 (9:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fscarano (Jan 27, 2006 11:52 am)

Generally, the higher the air pressure in your tires, the smoother the ride. Also, the greater rigidity of the tires means less friction on the road, leading to increased fuel economy. P.S. If you are ever stuck in the dirt, one way to help yourself out is to deflate your tires (not all the way of course to about 15 psi) and you will get more traction. The softer the tire, the greater the grip.
#8 of 43
Re: air pressurer//tires [shad] by turbo301
Feb 07, 2006 (3:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: shad (Jan 27, 2006 9:47 pm)

Higher tire pressure doesn't necessarily equate to a smoother ride; SW Ontario's frost-heaved roads make higher pressure equate to a lot of bouncing and vibration .
#9 of 43
Re: air pressurer//tires [fscarano] by bruneau1
May 18, 2006 (10:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: fscarano (Jan 27, 2006 11:52 am)

Higher pressures may give better mileage and maybe better handing under some conditions, but at a price: more noise, harsher ride, maybe more wear in the center of the tire. I have a 2001 with the handling pac and found even 32 often too stiff. I used 30 with more comfort. Just replaced the tires with Goodyear Comfort Tred. They have transformed the vehicle into a quieter and smoother riding one. Am using 32 lbs and will see how that goes. If noise and smooth ride are important, get these tires.
#10 of 43
Re: air pressurer//tires [bruneau1] by euphonium
May 19, 2006 (8:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: bruneau1 (May 18, 2006 10:58 am)

Agree with you on the results of higher air pressure.
 
The Handling Package enables better cornering and less pitching, but at a price of having more road feel and noise. So to install Comfort Treds would counter the advantages of the Handling Pac, but improve the ride.
 
I'll look into the Comfort Tred tire and thank you.
#11 of 43
fscarano by marsha7
Jan 29, 2006 (1:09 pm)
Reply
My 2004 LX Sport has the door decal (or is it on the fuel door?) that reads front and rear, 35 psi cold...my tires read a max tire pressure of 44 psi...
 
So, I fill them to 42 psi hot, let sit overnight, make sure out of sunlight in am, and let air out to 37-38 psi cold...firm ride, yes...better mpg???...no...
 
If tires leak out air down to 32-33 psi, I feel like I am riding on slush, with no control whatsoever...
 
Bob
#12 of 43
uh by johnclineii
Jan 29, 2006 (3:01 pm)
Reply
The rating on the tires is maximum safe pressure for that tire WITHOUT taking into account anything about the vehicle on which it is installed. It is NOT the recommended pressure for the tire when installed on a Crown Vic/Grand Marquis.
 
Tires running greater than recommended psi are more subject to impact damage.
#13 of 43
what your getting with your GM/CV MPG by fscarano
May 10, 2006 (10:49 am)
Reply
Some quick questions to get some feed back on GM/CV only. .
 
1 what’s the year of your vehicle and your current MPG average?
 
2. What Viscosity(5w-20 or 5w-30etc) and type(Mobil1, Valvoline etc) motor oil are you using?
 
3. What’s your cold tire pressure?
 
4. Have you ever hade a used oil analysis?
 
Me:
2000 GM 24-26 MPG
5-W20 Mobil1
34PSI cold
I never done used oil analysis/ I will with this oil change

Messages Page 2 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement