2007 Ford Edge First Drive

14 messages,  Last post on Dec 15, 2007 at 5:09 PM

You are in the Ford Edge Forum.

What is this discussion about? Ford Edge, SUV

#1 of 14 Article Comments: 2007 Ford Edge First Drive by KarenS HOST

Nov 02, 2006 (6:06 am)

Take a look at our 2007 Edge first drive. Post your comments here!
 
First Drive: 2007 Ford Edge

#2 of 14 Wheres the $$$ comparison. by mschmal

Nov 02, 2006 (1:08 pm)

What this article fails to address is the MSRP advantage Edge will have over Murano. Also, there is probably a core group of peeps in the Midwest who won't buy the Morano because the think it means moron in Italian.
 
Mark.

#3 of 14 Way too expensive by rlyon

Nov 03, 2006 (10:43 am)

I'd take the Murano over the Edge any day of the week. $37k loaded? No wonder Ford is bleeding cash. I think Ford means moron in Italian.

#4 of 14 Re: Way too expensive [rlyon] by akirby

Nov 03, 2006 (12:28 pm)

Replying to: rlyon (Nov 03, 2006 10:43 am)
What does the Murano have over the Edge that justifies the extra cost?

#5 of 14 Murano by mschmal

Nov 03, 2006 (2:45 pm)

Fancy Italian name.
 
Thats worth some $$$ right there.
 
Mark.

#6 of 14 more editorial comments by steve_ HOST

Nov 04, 2006 (7:01 pm)

Sounds like Karl pretty much agrees with the First Drive's "well-packaged midsize crossover SUV" take.
 
"Ultimately I see the Edge being a successful product for Ford. It looks good, it drives well and it has a comfortable, roomy and attractive (if somewhat chintzy) interior. Ford is hoping for well over 100,000 in annual sales, and I think it will get them."
 
Ford -- Living on the Edge? (Karl on Cars)

#7 of 14 Murano is faster 0-60, despite what article says... by coldcranker

Nov 04, 2006 (7:59 pm)

Replying to: steve_ (Nov 04, 2006 7:01 pm)
The Edmunds.com article is in error, because Car & Driver has the Murano doing 0-60 in 7.5 seconds, and the same magazine has the MKX (Edge clone) doing 0-60 in 8.1 seconds. The vehicles are close, but the lighter (yet same sized) Murano with the great VQ-series engine is faster.

#8 of 14 Re: Murano is faster 0-60, despite what article says... [coldcranker] by eriches

Nov 09, 2006 (12:03 pm)

Replying to: coldcranker (Nov 04, 2006 7:59 pm)
Actually, coldcranker, my article was not in error. The 0-60 time I gave for the Murano came from a crossover SUV comparsion test Edmunds.com conducted in 2003. Here's the link if you're interested: 2003 Midsize Crossover SUVs Comparison Test Specs & Performance
 
Where possible, we quote from our own test results.

#9 of 14 Hmm. by mschmal

Nov 09, 2006 (4:33 pm)

Assuming that the 0-60 times of both the Murano and the Edge are within 1 to 2 seconds of each other, WHO CARES!
 
Someone out there planing to take the Edge to Autocross?
 
GEEZE!
 
Mark.

#10 of 14 Re: Hmm. [mschmal] by coldcranker

Nov 09, 2006 (5:40 pm)

Replying to: mschmal (Nov 09, 2006 4:33 pm)
This forum is for discussing vehicles. 0-60 times are about vehicles. Sorry if this offends you.
To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement