Article Comments: 2007 Ford Edge First Drive

14 messages, Last post on Dec 15, 2007 at 4:09 PM

You are in the Ford Edge Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Ford Edge, SUV

Article Comments for First Drive: 2007 Ford Edge - It won't revolutionize the crossover segment, but the Edge is a well-packaged midsize crossover SUV. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 1 of 2: 1; 2; Prev; Next; Last

#1 of 14 Article Comments: 2007 Ford Edge First Drive by KarenS HOST Nov 02, 2006 (5:06 am)
Take a look at our 2007 Edge first drive. Post your comments here! First Drive: 2007 Ford Edge
#2 of 14 Wheres the $$$ comparison. by mschmal Nov 02, 2006 (12:08 pm)
What this article fails to address is the MSRP advantage Edge will have over Murano. Also, there is probably a core group of peeps in the Midwest who won't buy the Morano because the think it means moron in Italian. Mark.
#3 of 14 Way too expensive by rlyon Nov 03, 2006 (9:43 am)
I'd take the Murano over the Edge any day of the week. $37k loaded? No wonder Ford is bleeding cash. I think Ford means moron in Italian. Replies to this message: akirby (Nov 03, 2006 11:28 am)
#4 of 14 Re: Way too expensive [rlyon] by akirby Nov 03, 2006 (11:28 am)
Replying to: rlyon (Nov 03, 2006 9:43 am) What does the Murano have over the Edge that justifies the extra cost?
#5 of 14 Murano by mschmal Nov 03, 2006 (1:45 pm)
Fancy Italian name. Thats worth some $$$ right there. Mark.
#6 of 14 more editorial comments by steve_ HOST Nov 04, 2006 (6:01 pm)
Sounds like Karl pretty much agrees with the First Drive's "well-packaged midsize crossover SUV" take. "Ultimately I see the Edge being a successful product for Ford. It looks good, it drives well and it has a comfortable, roomy and attractive (if somewhat chintzy) interior. Ford is hoping for well over 100,000 in annual sales, and I think it will get them." Ford -- Living on the Edge? (Karl on Cars) Replies to this message: coldcranker (Nov 04, 2006 6:59 pm) eriches (Nov 09, 2006 11:03 am)
#7 of 14 Murano is faster 0-60, despite what article says... by coldcranker Nov 04, 2006 (6:59 pm)
Replying to: steve_ (Nov 04, 2006 6:01 pm) The Edmunds.com article is in error, because Car & Driver has the Murano doing 0-60 in 7.5 seconds, and the same magazine has the MKX (Edge clone) doing 0-60 in 8.1 seconds. The vehicles are close, but the lighter (yet same sized) Murano with the great VQ-series engine is faster. Replies to this message: eriches (Nov 09, 2006 11:03 am)
#8 of 14 Re: Murano is faster 0-60, despite what article says... [coldcranker] by eriches Nov 09, 2006 (11:03 am)
Replying to: coldcranker (Nov 04, 2006 6:59 pm) Actually, coldcranker, my article was not in error. The 0-60 time I gave for the Murano came from a crossover SUV comparsion test Edmunds.com conducted in 2003. Here's the link if you're interested: 2003 Midsize Crossover SUVs Comparison Test Specs & Performance Where possible, we quote from our own test results.
#9 of 14 Hmm. by mschmal Nov 09, 2006 (3:33 pm)
Assuming that the 0-60 times of both the Murano and the Edge are within 1 to 2 seconds of each other, WHO CARES! Someone out there planing to take the Edge to Autocross? GEEZE! Mark. Replies to this message: coldcranker (Nov 09, 2006 4:40 pm) akirby (Nov 09, 2006 4:50 pm) coldcranker (Nov 10, 2006 6:17 pm) and 1 more...
#10 of 14 Re: Hmm. [mschmal] by coldcranker Nov 09, 2006 (4:40 pm)
Replying to: mschmal (Nov 09, 2006 3:33 pm) This forum is for discussing vehicles. 0-60 times are about vehicles. Sorry if this offends you. Replies to this message: akirby (Nov 09, 2006 4:50 pm) coldcranker (Nov 10, 2006 6:17 pm) akirby (Nov 10, 2006 7:07 pm)