Sign In Join 



Dodge Charger Routine Care & Maintenance

59 messages,  Last post on Aug 02, 2009 at 9:00 AM

You are in the Dodge Charger Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Dodge Charger, Dodge Charger SRT-8, Exterior, Interior, Oil, Sedan


Messages Page 2 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#8 of 59
Re: Maintaince Problem Question [italianmaster1] by batista
Apr 22, 2007 (9:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: italianmaster1 (Apr 20, 2007 8:34 pm)

Why a 2006? Are you looking to buy used?
I have been happy with my SXT purchase but would buy the R/T if I had the chance to do it all over again.
I drive in the city and with all the stop and go I have been getting 14-16 mpg.
The V6 fuel economy savings is almost non-existant plus you have friends/coworkers saying "does that thing have a hemi"?
There isn't much feedback with the Charger here. Check out chargerforums.com and you will get lots of help.
 
Funny you mention the Impala. I purchased a new 01 Impala and it was nothing but problems. First the aluminum cradle creak then the steering, intake manifold and then the transmission. Even with my $1800 in GM Visa points I won't buy another GM car again.
#9 of 59
Re: Maintaince Problem Question [batista] by italianmaster1
Apr 22, 2007 (4:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: batista (Apr 22, 2007 9:01 am)

Because of insurance reasons. Im only 22. I really would like to get the Hemi. be sweet. But I might lean that way. I sat in a buddies SXT and he said the same thing that fuel economy on the 3.5L is non existant. Plus looking into this car I shouldnt have to worry about that. Its a sports car = gas money spent.
 
Thanks for the respose though
#10 of 59
Re: Maintaince Problem Question [batista] by xtec
Apr 22, 2007 (8:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: batista (Apr 22, 2007 9:01 am)

batista-
  Why does your mileage suck?My Sxt has been great on gas and lot better then my 02 Intrepid(Sxt) with the same engine.If thats all your getting,I would have it checked out.I got 18-19(city) with my Intrepid and was pleased when My Charger was better.As for the Hemi,its a great engine but eats gas,and the Hemi is only about 1 1/2 seconds faster.Plus I don't think the price of gas is going down to soon.
#11 of 59
Re: Maintaince Problem Question [xtec] by batista
Apr 22, 2007 (9:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: xtec (Apr 22, 2007 8:37 pm)

It's not only me with low city fuel economy.
If you check out chargerforums.com there are some members who report very similar mpg as the R/T model.
The new more accurate ratings with the EPA shows 17/24 for the SXT while the R/T gets 15/23.
My previous car was rated at 19/29 and I consistently got 16-18 so it's not a big deal. Plus, this car weighs 500lbs more than the Impala and more HP.
I find the SXT model to be good in performance but not good at quick bursts of acceleration at highway speeds. I can live with this because I seldom drive on the highway. What helps is if you put in autostick mode instead of "drive" because that takes away the delay in downshifting.
 
Very true about the price of gas. That is why I chose the SXT and the fact that I rarely get the chance to open it up because of the city traffic.
#12 of 59
Re: Maintaince Problem Question [batista] by xtec
Jun 19, 2007 (11:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: batista (Apr 22, 2007 9:30 pm)

batista-
 
I just filled my tank,and I got 20.4 MPG.This is city driving only with no/ac.My last tank was 19.8.The last time I filled up I put a bottle of STP fuel injection cleaner in which gave me the 20.4.I use the STP cleaner every 4k miles,to keep the injectors clean.If your mileage is that bad ,you should try the cleaner and see what happens.
#13 of 59
Re: Maintaince Problem Question [xtec] by batista
Jun 19, 2007 (1:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: xtec (Jun 19, 2007 11:55 am)

Hi xtec.
 
That's excellent fuel economy the 3.5L Charger.
My fuel economy is improving a bit since I only have 4500 miles on my car. My best so far has been 17.2 mpg (worst was 14.8) almost all city. I reset the trip odometer after each fill-up.
You have an edge in fuel economy because of the warmer climate. I live in the pacific northwest and have yet to use AC because summer hasn't arrived quite yet.
Once I have more miles I will try your suggestion of fuel injector cleaning.
#14 of 59
Excellent FE, indeed... by discgolfer99
Jun 19, 2007 (2:43 pm)
Reply
Even when I "baby" my 3.5L SXT all the way through a tank, I think the best I have done was 18 MPG (city). It's just not nearly as fun though, so "Speed Racer" it is...
 
Next month, she'll be 2 years old. As of today, I wouldn't trade this car for ANY other car on the market (in the same price range). Now, when the new Challenger comes out, I may have to seriously consider getting a two door. That thing looks awesome...
 
As for the Hemi, when I bought my Charger, the only version they had with the Hemi included Nav, steering wheel controls, and some other features, all of which I would love to have gotten. The only thing was, it was $5500 more than the SXT, ant they were not willing to take ANY $ off the sticker. I left, hoping they would stop me on the way out, which they did not. I went back an hour later to "negotiate" on the SXT, and managed to get $2000 off...
 
CHARGE ON !!!
#15 of 59
Re: Excellent FE, indeed... [discgolfer99] by xtec
Jun 19, 2007 (6:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: discgolfer99 (Jun 19, 2007 2:43 pm)

I do have a advantage like batista says I live in AZ and its been in the 90s the last month or so,now its in the 100s and that helps.plus I run premium.I'm going to have to use my A/C so that will drop it around 1 mpg.Plus I drive like A old lady.With the price of gas im driving like there is a egg under my gas pedal.
#16 of 59
Re: Excellent FE, indeed... [xtec] by batista
Jun 19, 2007 (7:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: xtec (Jun 19, 2007 6:51 pm)

Why premium? Do you notice a difference?
When I purchased my car the dealer filled the tank up (cheapskates) with regular and I wasn't happy about it because I had read that these cars require mid-grade. Have been using 89 almost all the time.
I tried a tank of 92 and it felt a bit smoother but no difference in fuel economy. How about you?
#17 of 59
Re: Excellent FE, indeed... [batista] by discgolfer99
Jun 20, 2007 (8:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: batista (Jun 19, 2007 7:52 pm)

I used to put 89, since the owners manual said too. But when gas went "RIDICULOUS" (here is So. Cal), and I had also read some 'expert' say you only need to use >87 if your car "pings" with 87, I tried the 87, and found no noticable difference or pinging...
 
At least gas is back under $3 ---> YEAH !!

Messages Page 2 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement