Sign In Join 



Dodge Charger: Aftermarket Accessories & Performance Mods

74 messages,  Last post on Nov 05, 2009 at 6:44 PM

You are in the Dodge Charger Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Dodge Charger, Dodge Charger SRT-8, Performance Mods, Sedan


Messages Page 4 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#28 of 74
Re: Large aftermarket exhaust systems... [shipo] by used2bfast
Jun 24, 2006 (12:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Jun 14, 2006 10:36 am)

Hi Shipo,
 
   Thanks for an excellent post, and allow me to add a few things.
 
   First, rest assured that any engine produced for the purpose of daily consumer use is far from utilizing an idealized harmonic resonance relationship in its intake/exhaust systems. Critical tuning such as what you are describing will exist only in the most carefully engineered and contemplated internal combustion engines (read: Ferrari, Lamborghini). The fact that John Q. Public can go out and slap a simple K&N filter on his V-8, along with a crummy Chinese exhaust system, and see a 15-30 hp increase is testimony to this fact. Trust me, DC, GM, Foad [sic], and whoever, all know how to make their engines produce more horse, but the reason they don't is simple; Engineering Economics, a.k.a., "...build the cheapest POS that will still get the job done, and get it out to the public...". The intake and exhaust systems sold with 99% of the vehicles today are produced with far more emphasis on cost reduction than they are in making power. This is (again) why aftermarket manufacturers such as Flowmaster, GHL, Corsa, etc., all can make a living - because John Q. Public is doing far more to assist the acoustic performance of his engine by removing the factory parts, than he is to hinder it.
 
Just my two Euro.
 
used2bfast
#29 of 74
CAT BACK has landed... by discgolfer99
Jun 28, 2006 (1:43 pm)
Reply
Went to the dealer this morning, 7:00 am sharp, and bought the Dual Cat Back Exhaust kit (# 82209611) for the V6 3.5L Charger. Arrived at "Awesome Performance" (near work) and they started installation at 8:15 and completed at 9:00.
 
Kit Cost $426.00
Install $120.00 (Dealer wanted almost $300.00)
 
Sounds Great.
Looks Great.
 
I am VERY happy...... So far.....
#30 of 74
Re: CAT BACK has landed... [discgolfer99] by losski
Jul 04, 2006 (10:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: discgolfer99 (Jun 28, 2006 1:43 pm)

I did the same thing and i am Very happy also.
#31 of 74
Re: CAT BACK has landed... [losski] by xtec
Jul 05, 2006 (2:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: losski (Jul 04, 2006 10:42 am)

Let me know if there is a differance on your MPG.I don't want to invest that much money if the mileage doesn't go up.
#32 of 74
Re: CAT BACK has landed... [xtec] by discgolfer99
Jul 06, 2006 (3:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: xtec (Jul 05, 2006 2:04 pm)

xtec - will do. It will probably be a couple weeks, as I want to burn through a couple tanks to get the numbers. I have been tracking my milage since I got the car, so I have a good history to compare too...
#33 of 74
Re: CAT BACK has landed... [discgolfer99] by xtec
Jul 06, 2006 (5:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: discgolfer99 (Jul 06, 2006 3:44 pm)

Thanks for your reply,I appreciate it.
#34 of 74
Re: CAT BACK has landed... [losski] by losski
Jul 12, 2006 (10:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: losski (Jul 04, 2006 10:42 am)

My mpg are good and went up and it sounds good.
#35 of 74
Re: CAT BACK has landed... [discgolfer99] by xtec
Jul 26, 2006 (3:41 pm)
Reply

Replying to: discgolfer99 (Jul 06, 2006 3:44 pm)

Disc-Have you come up with any numbers on your MPGs since you added the dual exhaust?Right now I'm getting between 19.8 and 20 in the city and don't want to mess that up.
Thanks for your help with this.
#36 of 74
Re: CAT BACK has landed... [xtec] by discgolfer99
Jul 27, 2006 (8:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: xtec (Jul 26, 2006 3:41 pm)

I was just logging in to report...
 
If you are looking for or expecting "ROI" (Return On Investment) from this endevour, I wouldn't do it. The milage has improved 1 to 1.5 miles per gallon. That's maybe a savings of 1 gallon per tank (for me 1 tank per week), at about $3.25 per gallon, thats about $170 per year savings. It will take about 3 years to reach payback point. Actually, on second thought, that is not so bad, since I do plan on keeping it for at least 3 years.
 
I still would mention again how awesume it SOUNDS, and the increased HP is "very noticable". I am very pleased with the outcome.
 
I ordered a K&N Air Filter on Monday which I should get today. I'll see if that makes any noticable difference...
 
CHARGE ON !!!
#37 of 74
Re: CAT BACK has landed... [discgolfer99] by xtec
Jul 27, 2006 (10:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: discgolfer99 (Jul 27, 2006 8:31 am)

Disc-Thanks for the report.If it will give me better performance and MPGs,it doesn't sound bad.I will do more thinking on it.I plan on keeping my Charger for 4yrs.I put A K&N on mine and I lost power and 2mpgs with it.I sent it back to K&N and put back my stock filter,and now its back to normal.On the stock filter it says high flow on it so I think it out performed the K&N.Maybe with the dual exhaust,
it will work better,you just have to wait and see what happens.Thanks

Messages Page 4 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement