Sign In Join 



Mitsubishi Outlander Prices Paid and Buying Experience

935 messages,  Last post on Aug 26, 2009 at 8:37 PM

You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx

What is this discussion about? Mitsubishi Outlander, Car Leasing, Car Buying, SUV


Messages Page 8 of 94
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
94
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#70 of 935
Re: Am i doing something wrong? [sampowers] by dodo2
Nov 16, 2006 (2:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sampowers (Nov 16, 2006 1:56 pm)

+1 here.
#71 of 935
Mitsubishi... by kyfdx HOST
Nov 16, 2006 (2:21 pm)
Reply
..compares the Outlander to the following cars (on the Mitsubishi website)..
 
CR-V
RAV4
Vue
Escape
Tribute
Forester
Equinox
Tuscon
 
Just FYI..
#72 of 935
Re: Mitsubishi... [kyfdx] by dodo2
Nov 16, 2006 (2:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kyfdx (Nov 16, 2006 2:21 pm)

I know that comparison, but has no much value from my stand point. For instance, they compare Outlander with RAV4 I4 (?!..)
#73 of 935
Re: Well...I might have flipped.... [sampowers] by mrmister2000
Nov 16, 2006 (3:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sampowers (Nov 16, 2006 1:49 pm)

It's off topic, but a few weeks ago I had a Hyundai dealer offer me an '07 Santa Fe Limited 4X4 with the Touring, Premium, AND Ultimate packages (essentially all packages that are offered for this model) for a price of $27,838 BEFORE rebates... which was just a hair shy of $5,000 BELOW MSRP.
 
Now, I really like the Outlander and it's at the top of my list, but if it weren't for the fact that I need to get some other bills taken care of first before I invest in a new vehicle I would have probably snatched that Santa Fe up in a jiffy.
 
Personally, I think the Santa Fe is ever so slightly nicer looking exterior-wise, and a whole lot nicer looking than the Outlander interior-wise. On the other hand, the Outlander has a lot of neat extras, options, and bells and whistles that you could never hope to get with the Santa Fe... so it's a toss-up.
 
I've been reading some other recent posts and I have to admit that for some reason the Outlander does seem to have a bit of a mini-van'ish appearance, especially when looked at from the back. At all other viewing angles I still think it looks perfectly fine... but there's just something about the way that the back looks that I don't like.
 
As of right now I'm not sure which of the two vehicles I like more. Being a computer/techie geek puts me in favor of the Outlander, but I also like the look and price (see above) of the Santa Fe. Decisions, decisions...
#74 of 935
Re: Well...I might have flipped.... [mrmister2000] by dodo2
Nov 16, 2006 (3:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrmister2000 (Nov 16, 2006 3:39 pm)

What I cannot understand is how come Santa Fe is a brand new model that had received good reviws everywhere, got most of the stuff covered, but yet you can got low financing and big discounts on already fairly low prices. Aren't they suppose to sell well without extra incentives?
#75 of 935
Re: Well...I might have flipped.... [mrmister2000] by dodo2
Nov 16, 2006 (4:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrmister2000 (Nov 16, 2006 3:39 pm)

What about driving the car... which one do you like? I think this is an important factor too if you are a car enthusiast of some sort.
Ideally, I wish I could buy a compact SUV with Santa Fe's price, Outlander's looks and handling, Honda's quality and Toyota's resale value. But I think at this time I have to compromise to the best overall package which it appears to be the Outlander for me.
#76 of 935
Re: Well...I might have flipped.... [mrmister2000] by tester1
Nov 16, 2006 (6:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrmister2000 (Nov 16, 2006 3:39 pm)

May I ask which dealer it is for such a good price?
#77 of 935
Re: Well...I might have flipped.... [tester1] by mrmister2000
Nov 16, 2006 (7:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tester1 (Nov 16, 2006 6:44 pm)

The dealer was Brad Benson Hyundai, of NJ. The price was quoted to me by email during an October sales event they were having at the time.
 
I suppose that's my biggest gripe about the Outlander... just that I had expected it to be around $2,000 to $3,000 cheaper than it had actually turned out being for the config that I had wanted. When I saw Mitsu's claims of "fully loaded" for under $30K that's what I had expected... that you could get every available option (sunroof, premium sound, nav system, rear dvd player)and it would still cost less than $30K. This isn't true though... with those options the cost is actually somewhere just shy of $32K. My thought had been that if somebody could get one of these fully-loaded for under $30K (as the early press claims had suggested before the official pricing had been decided) and if one had decided that they didn't need the DVD entertainment system, that would have shaved maybe $1,000 off the price bringing it to around $29,000. But, instead for this config its actually $31,000. Quite a difference. I still don't think the pricing is bad, but an extra $2,000 more than I was expected is enough to make go back to considering other alternatives again.
#78 of 935
Re: Well...I might have flipped.... [mrmister2000] by dodo2
Nov 16, 2006 (8:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrmister2000 (Nov 16, 2006 7:29 pm)

I think the effective price of the fully loaded Outlander would be under 30K provided that you buy it at around the invoice price ($29,745, including $625 destination charge). However, I get your point - MSRP under 30K fully loaded.
#79 of 935
Re: Well...I might have flipped.... [dodo2] by mrmister2000
Nov 16, 2006 (9:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dodo2 (Nov 16, 2006 8:11 pm)

Exactly, I mean I do recall reading some recent posts from others who just bought one and got it for $500 below invoice, but that's not a firm number worthy of using for comparison with other manu's vehicles. I seriously doubt that there are many (if any) dealerships around here that would even consider letting one of these go fully-loaded for invoice price, or under. A guy can dream though
 
On an off tangent, last week I had called both Mitsu Customer Service and a local Mitsu dealership to get some info about leasing one of these. When I had asked what the "residual value" was the Customer Service rep thought I was speaking in tongue... and the dealership was like "we can't figure that out on the phone... you would need to come in so we could find that information for you."
 
Now, the Mitsu execs know full-well what the intended closed-end lease residual value percentages should be for this truck under given circumstances (the residual is usually a firm amount that gets set at around the same time as a vehicle's pricing is decided upon, based on market trends and such)... but it seems they neglected to pass this important information on to anyone else in the Mitsu family. Maybe the residual value of the new Outlander is TOP SECRET? You know things are bad when a Mistubishi Customer Service Representative has to ask you "Sir? What exacly is residual? I've never heard that term before..."
 
Come on, Mitsu. You've got a fairly decent new vehicle on your hands... now get on the ball!

Messages Page 8 of 94
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
94
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement