- #1 of 24
-
Article Comments: 2007 BMW X5 First Drive
by KarenS HOST
-
Oct 31, 2006 (9:00 am)
-
|
Take a look at the 2007 X5 first drive review and tell us what you think.
First Drive: 2007 BMW X5
|
- #2 of 24
-
new shifter not needed
by stangmatt66
-
Oct 31, 2006 (11:02 am)
-
|
|
Why did BMW need to create the electronic console shifter? They could have put in the electronic stalk shifter from the 7-series. That's what MB did in the new ML-class to create huge cup holders in the console.
|
- #3 of 24
-
3rd Row
by accordfreak
-
Nov 01, 2006 (6:16 pm)
-
|
|
I'm wondering how the third row compares to the new Acura MDX or the 07 Volvo XC90? Obviously these aren't meant for 6 ft'ers, but are they good enough when you want ot take a few co workers out for lunch or will they last when my 10 yr old turns into a 15 yr old? Am I better off spending the money on a Sequoia? I love the look of the X5, the Acura frankly looks UGLY, and I always liked to the look of the xc90. I've always been a honda/acura person, but they've missed the mark on the MDX this time
|
- #4 of 24
-
Re: 3rd Row [accordfreak]
by quattroporte12
-
Nov 01, 2006 (9:33 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: accordfreak (Nov 01, 2006 6:16 pm)
Yea the MDX is REALLY REALLY ugly!!! I saw it in person and it was even worse than the pictures. I have not been in the x5's rear seat, but i would guess that it is smaller than the xc90. If you really want a comfortable car for co-workers, the Mercedes R-class really does seat 6 adults. However, you might not like the look of the R, not many people do... The MB GL also has a pretty roomy rear seat, and the Audi Q7 has one about the same size if not a little bigger than the XC90. I would wait to see the x5 before purchasing, and you might want to check out the Audi and Mercedes. I do not recommend getting a sequoia. We're in the process of selling ours, it has been pretty unreliable (unlike most toyotas) and has just not been the car (or truck, as the ride shows) that we thought it would be... Maybe the new ones will be nicer...id wait until they come out in a year or two...or even better go for the BMW, Merc, or Audi. 
|
- #5 of 24
-
Re: 3rd Row [quattroporte12]
by dt63944
-
Nov 02, 2006 (7:35 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: quattroporte12 (Nov 01, 2006 9:33 pm)
I saw the MDX in person and it was a quite good-looking vehicle. Perhaps you were looking at the pre-2007 model, which wasn't much in the "styling department". In fact, I would say the 2007 MDX is one of the most attractive-looking SUV's in production. "Ugly"? Definitely not. Better go check the lot and ask someone to show you a 2007. As far as the 2007 X5, it's one of the most thoughtful and attractive upgrades BMW has made in a long time. It took them awhile to get on the same page when Bangle came in, but it's clicking for them now.
|
- #6 of 24
-
Re: 3rd Row [accordfreak]
by low_ball_88
-
Nov 02, 2006 (1:03 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: accordfreak (Nov 01, 2006 6:16 pm)
I own an 07 530i and a Sequoia LTD. All I can say is that I will not buy the Sequoia again. Cheap interior and overtime I felt the ride was too rough. It is a Tundra with shell on it. I am considering replacing it with an X5, MDX, or Q7. But definitely not until all the kinks are worked out. So I would only consider an 08 or 09 SUV.
|
- #7 of 24
-
Noise
by rcf8000
-
Nov 02, 2006 (4:01 pm)
-
|
|
I notice that road and wind noise levels aren't mentioned in the Edmunds review, nor are they mentioned in the 24 page press release BMW put out on the improvements made in the new X5. Apparently, these aren't considered to be as important as ride and handling qualities, which are talked about a lot. They are important to me, though, and I'd like to read a review that mentions them.
|
- #8 of 24
-
Re: 3rd Row [low_ball_88]
by dt63944
-
Nov 02, 2006 (4:17 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: low_ball_88 (Nov 02, 2006 1:03 pm)
As far as the X5 is concerned, I'm wondering whether it's an X5 that is further-refined without the bugs of earlier versions, or whether it is a largely-new version with an increased chance for problems. I've not seen anything clear about that. I am concerned, however, at the increasing use of computers not just to design vehicles, but to justify the decreased amount of real-world testing; it's an industry-wide problem. I've had three Subaru Foresters in a row and appreciate the fact that the bugs have been worked out; when they introduced the new Outback I was reluctant to become a beta tester for Subaru, so I understand your position.
|
- #9 of 24
-
Re: 3rd Row [low_ball_88]
by quattroporte12
-
Nov 03, 2006 (1:51 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: low_ball_88 (Nov 02, 2006 1:03 pm)
I agree 100% about the Sequoia. The materials are so cheap and overall it is not a very satisfying car. We just upgraded to the Q7...cant wait for it to come in...
|
- #10 of 24
-
Re: 3rd Row [dt63944]
by quattroporte12
-
Nov 03, 2006 (1:54 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: dt63944 (Nov 02, 2006 7:35 am)
It may have been the pre-2007 model, but im pretty sure it was the 2007. I saw it in a parking lot about a week ago. What i dont like about it is that the overhang in the front is waay to long, the wheels are waayy to small, and it doesnt have enough curves, there are too many hard edges and creases in the sheet metal. I guess the interior is okay, but the exterior is not my style.
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs 
