Sign In Join 



Ford Edge Predicted and Actual Reliability

39 messages,  Last post on May 23, 2009 at 2:07 PM

You are in the Ford Edge Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Ford Edge, Auto Repair, SUV


Messages Page 3 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#16 of 39
Re: Ford is a Low Quality Brand So Expect the Edge to be Low Quality, THATS by akirby
Nov 03, 2006 (9:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rafael2 (Nov 03, 2006 2:02 pm)

Prove when Ford had a car that was a well built as the Japanese, a Honda or a Toyota.
 
The 2006 Fusion has a lower defect rate than both the Accord and the Camry. NO recalls. Hardly any TSBs. Very few user reported problems. According to Ford's TGW Global Quality Research System:
 
Fusion 1,172 TGWs (things gone wrong)
Accord 1,353
Camry 1,193
 
Not the reaction I get on my HONDA Odyssey!
 
You mean the Odyssey that's had 27 (that's right, 27) recalls since 1997? And 5 in the last 2 years? Sorry but you picked the wrong poster child for import superiority.
 
I'm talking about the new products from Ford - the F150, Mustang, Fusion, 500, Edge and their Lincoln/Mercury counterparts that have all been introduced new or significantly updated in the last 3 years. These models are proving extremely reliable - equal to or better than the imports. No argument on some of the older stuff. But it's not 1995 anymore. Even Hyundai has respectable (if not stellar) quality now.
#17 of 39
Re: Ford is a Low Quality Brand So Expect the Edge to be Low Quality, THATS IT. [rafael2] by bobw3
Nov 16, 2006 (10:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: rafael2 (Nov 03, 2006 2:02 pm)

What planet do you live on? I can't imagine anyone being booed by a stranger because of the car they drove, and Explorers are everywhere. Strange post.
#18 of 39
Re: Ford is a Low Quality Brand So Expect the Edge to be Low Quality, THATS IT. [bobw3] by passat_2002
Nov 16, 2006 (11:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Nov 16, 2006 10:26 am)

I believe raf said he lived on the planet Troll. Strangely, that somehow seemed appropriate.
#19 of 39
Re: Ford is a Low Quality Brand So Expect the Edge to be Low Quality, THATS IT. [passat_2002] by fordenvy
Jul 06, 2007 (7:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: passat_2002 (Nov 16, 2006 11:48 am)

He is just another reason I believe half of the people on this planet are blind with ignorance. I hate opinions without any research backing it. And Bob is right about the Fusion and counter-parts are better quality than the Camry and Accord.
#20 of 39
Re: Ford is a Low Quality Brand So Expect the Edge.....to be Low Quality by svofan2
Jul 11, 2007 (12:40 pm)
Reply
I am going to give you the "proverbial" 0.02 cents on this matter ...I am ready to buy a CUV and I was undecided between the EDGE and the MAZDA CX 9..both good vehicles in my opinion,of course the CX 9 being a higher price. I subscribed to different groups MAZDA and FORD EDGE and what I am noticing is that the MAZDA CX 9 forums are reporting more "dissapointments" (small ones) than the people in the EDGE forums. This made me think in the price differences on both vehicles fully loaded (about $3500 difference). Again for the price, it seems that FORD's EDGE is a winner hands down.I have not followed the others like the ENCLAVE (dealers believe that they have a "HOT" item..very little negotiations,if any)..Saturn(with their "famous" no haggling policy) and GMC (they also think that they have the vehicle for the second coming of CHRIST ,not trying to be irreverent),so that leaves me back to the EDGE,which incidentally you can hardly find any 2007 they way I want it, so I will wait another 30 or 60 ddays for the 2008 which is coming much better equip (they way I like it).
Sorry for the long posting..
#21 of 39
Re: Reliability [frizz2112] by mustangandy
Jul 26, 2007 (4:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: frizz2112 (Oct 23, 2006 4:51 pm)

I have been driving Fords for over forty years and I have had very good service with every one of them.I have a 96 Aerostar with well over 100,000 miles on. This vehicle has never had a tune up, original spark, wires, etc. Never had a problem with it. It run like a new one, not one time has it ever failed me, and its still solid and trouble free and I have had it for over ten years. There is no way that I would trade any of my Ford's for a rice burner. I also have a 2003 Ford Super Duty turbo diesel, great truck, lot of power, well built, not bad on fuel either, better than any stinken Tundra.
#22 of 39
Re: Reliability [ANT14] by mustangandy
Jul 26, 2007 (7:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ANT14 (Oct 20, 2006 10:12 am)

Great article, how true it is. No manufacture is perfect. I have been driving Fords for over forty years, and they have been good to me.I hope Ford gets through this and gets back on top.No rice burners for me.

Messages Page 3 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement