Sign In Join 



Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?

6840 messages,  Last post on Nov 25, 2009 at 2:33 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 580 of 685
1
...
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
...
685
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5786 of 6840
Re: CC Goal, Global Governance [avalon02wh] by oldfarmer50
Jul 13, 2009 (2:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: avalon02wh (Jul 12, 2009 5:56 pm)

"...You actually expect politicians to create wealth or happiness???..."
 
Heck no. Nor would I expect them to properly manage the extra money that Cap and Trade brings in. It would be squandered much the same as your regular taxes are now.
 
The only thing I expect from politicians is that they get out of my way so that I can create wealth and happiness.
 
"...You might say there are too many animals at the watering hole..."
 
Good analogy. What happens to an animal at that watering hole that steps aside and lets the others drink? She dies of thirst and so do her offspring.
 
Nature and nations are alike. The world is not a Disney film even if we wish it was.
#5787 of 6840
Re: CC Goal, Global Governance [gagrice] by larsb
Jul 13, 2009 (9:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jul 12, 2009 5:16 am)

Oh dear lord......talk about paranoia.........
 
"The Black Helicopters are coming !!!!"
 
"Global governance" of pollution is a GOOD idea, not a bad one. Getting all the countries to reduce their pollution and waste can NEVER be painted as a bad thing.
 
No one is talking about "global governance" as in "one WORLD government which controls all the countries in every facet" - that is idiotic and impossible and not anything anyone needs to waste time worrying about, much less waste server space on Edmunds talking about.
#5788 of 6840
Re: CC Goal, Global Governance [larsb] by fintail
Jul 13, 2009 (9:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jul 13, 2009 9:11 am)

Global governance of pollution still seems to neglect holding the pet developments of globalists (Chindia et al) to any level of accountability. So far it seems to be little more than a scheme to make doing business more expensive in the first world, little more.
 
"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent."
 
Criminal heir James Warburg, while speaking before the United States Senate, February 17, 1950
#5789 of 6840
Re: CC Goal, Global Governance [fintail] by larsb
Jul 13, 2009 (9:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Jul 13, 2009 9:15 am)

In regard to controlling pollution with one cooperative treaty:
 
I'm not saying it could work, given all the cooperation problems.
But if it COULD work, it's not a bad idea.
 
As far as "One World Government": about as likely as aliens taking over the planet.
#5790 of 6840
Re: CC Goal, Global Governance [larsb] by fintail
Jul 13, 2009 (9:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jul 13, 2009 9:16 am)

That's an "if" the size of Jupiter. Given the desires of many involved, I will have to see it to believe it. Seems like a good scheme to benefit business interests in locations allowed to be environmental criminals, while feigning giving a damn about mother Earth.
 
Globalized economics is the first step towards one world government. The EU is a small scale experiment in one world government - and there now some nations there are panicking and changing their structures to ward off a loss of sovereignty caused by recent EU power grabs. It will be attempted more in the future
#5791 of 6840
Re: CC Goal, Global Governance [fintail] by larsb
Jul 13, 2009 (9:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Jul 13, 2009 9:22 am)

Well, we all got 99 problems and worrying about a "world government" should never be one of them.....
#5792 of 6840
Re: CC Goal, Global Governance [larsb] by gagrice
Jul 13, 2009 (10:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jul 13, 2009 9:16 am)

A cooperative treaty will only be a burden on the few countries that adopt it. Look at the total failure of Kyoto. All those flakes that signed on and NOT ONE country achieved the goals set out by Kyoto. China and India the two most populace Nations have said NO to the new improved Treaty. So where does that leave US? I can tell you, just like the UN we will be paying most of the bills for all these criminal types to have conferences in luxury hotels in exotic locations. Laughing their a**es off at the ignorant sheep paying the bills.
 
Cap n Trade will run even more businesses out of the US into the arms of China. Al Gore does not give a hoot. He has a mansion, jet and 100' house boat with a $100 million for fuel. He is not trying to run a business with a bunch of leeches telling him his toilets are not up to code or he has to completely revamp his factory to meet the new tougher regulations. Sounds good unless you were one of the people working there when he says screw it, I cannot afford to do business in the USA.
 
That is just one aspect of why the whole climate bill is bad for America.
 
If you have a global governing body. They can dictate anything they like which makes it a one World Government. We have Friends in Greece in the Government. They are trying to rid themselves of the Euro and all the crap the EU is trying to pull.
#5793 of 6840
Re: CC Goal, Global Governance [gagrice] by steve_ HOST
Jul 13, 2009 (12:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jul 13, 2009 10:46 am)

A lot of us didn't meet our New Year's Resolutions either.
 
I'll see your Kyoto and raise you Montreal.
 
(I'll believe one world government when I see California simply put together a budget).
#5794 of 6840
Re: CC Goal, Global Governance [steve_] by ruking1
Jul 13, 2009 (12:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jul 13, 2009 12:27 pm)

(I'll believe one world government when I see California simply put together a budget).
 
Actually it is a model.... OVERSPEND OVERSPEND OVERSPEND...under deliver....
#5795 of 6840
Re: CC Goal, Global Governance [steve_] by gagrice
Jul 13, 2009 (4:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jul 13, 2009 12:27 pm)

A one World government seems far fetched when you look how messed up CA is. It will have to be a Putinesque type dictatorship. Tomorrow we shut down all the casinos. You want to gamble go to Siberia.
 
Same goes for all these CC ideas. In the USA they will be attacking the tax payers standard of living and I don't think they will keep voting someone in that wants to take away their cars and comfortable homes. If people think their civil liberties are trounced on by the Patriot Act, they are in for one rude awakening if Cap N Trade gets a foot hold. We are already seeing the effects of CA mandates on power. Higher utility bills with mandatory cut backs in usage. Usage over 354 KWH per month are doubled then over 460 KWH per month are quadrupled in price. According to the SDG&E bill I am holding in my hand, I am using 40.4% less this year than last. That is only because it is so much cooler this year than last. Yet the CC Wonks won't accept they are full of you know what with their hockey stick data. I know what I would do with that hockey stick if I had Al Gore here.

Messages Page 580 of 685
1
...
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
...
685
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement