Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?
6840 messages, Last post on Nov 25, 2009 at 2:33 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: avalon02wh (Jul 12, 2009 6:14 pm) Much simpler explanation. It is where the pay check comes from. And then only a handful of highly paid scientists really push the bunk about man made GW/CC. The data is just not there. And the cooling trend across the globe is the best evidence that increased CO2 has little or no effect. I'm on the side of the majority of scientists that don't believe Al Gore and his money grabbing cronies with their agenda of One World government. just google: 31000 scientists against global warming Thousands of scientists sign petition against global warming by Charles Biggs It’s about time that liberals like Al Gore come up with a new crisis. Global warming (climate change) is running out of steam. Bob Unruh of WorldNetDaily reported that 31,000 U.S. scientists - 9,000 with doctorate degrees in atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and other specialties - have signed a petition rejecting global warming. The list of scientists includes 9,021 Ph.D.s, 6,961 at the master’s level, 2,240 medical doctors and 12,850 carrying a bachelor of science or equivalent academic degree. Global warming assumes that human production of greenhouse gases is destroying the Earth’s climate. According to the petition, “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing, or will in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. “Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.” http://www.tulsabeacon.com/?p=462 The Petition Project www.petitionproject.org has been underway for 10 years. It’s a gradual movement but it was spurred on by the release of Gore’s “documentary” An Inconvenient Truth. Gore’s movie claims there is a “consensus” and “settled science” about human-caused global warming. It was particularly unsettling because teachers all across the country showed the movie to students to indoctrinate them in global warming. “Unfortunately, Mr. Gore’s movie contains many very serious incorrect claims which no informed, honest scientist could endorse,” said project spokesman and founder Art Robinson. Robinson said Gore’s folly has gone so far that it is damaging people’s lives. “The campaign to severely ration hydrocarbon energy technology has now been markedly expanded,” he said. “In the course of this campaign, many scientifically invalid claims about impending climate emergencies are being made. Simultaneously, proposed political actions to severely reduce hydrocarbon use now threaten the prosperity of Americans and the very existence of hundreds of millions of people in poorer countries,” Robinson said. Is this politics versus science? Yes. Which is more dangerous, Gore’s false claims or the policies that spring from his deception? Liberals blame global warming for recent shark attacks off the shore of California, typhoons, earthquakes and just about any natural disaster. And the effort is aimed at the pocketbook of every American. Our federal government is close to an international agreement that would ration our use of energy. The targets are coal, oil, natural gas and other organic compounds.
|
|
|
Replying to: avalon02wh (Jul 11, 2009 1:29 pm) It will not affect people, that are allowed to have a carbon footprint as large as they like. With a Global Government, we will be brought down to the living standard of those in Africa, India and China. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: avalon02wh (Jul 12, 2009 5:56 pm) Heck no. Nor would I expect them to properly manage the extra money that Cap and Trade brings in. It would be squandered much the same as your regular taxes are now. The only thing I expect from politicians is that they get out of my way so that I can create wealth and happiness. "...You might say there are too many animals at the watering hole..." Good analogy. What happens to an animal at that watering hole that steps aside and lets the others drink? She dies of thirst and so do her offspring. Nature and nations are alike. The world is not a Disney film even if we wish it was. 
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Jul 12, 2009 5:16 am) "The Black Helicopters are coming !!!!" "Global governance" of pollution is a GOOD idea, not a bad one. Getting all the countries to reduce their pollution and waste can NEVER be painted as a bad thing. No one is talking about "global governance" as in "one WORLD government which controls all the countries in every facet" - that is idiotic and impossible and not anything anyone needs to waste time worrying about, much less waste server space on Edmunds talking about.
|
|
|
Replying to: larsb (Jul 13, 2009 9:11 am) "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." Criminal heir James Warburg, while speaking before the United States Senate, February 17, 1950
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Jul 13, 2009 9:15 am) I'm not saying it could work, given all the cooperation problems. But if it COULD work, it's not a bad idea. As far as "One World Government": about as likely as aliens taking over the planet. |
|
|
Replying to: larsb (Jul 13, 2009 9:16 am) Globalized economics is the first step towards one world government. The EU is a small scale experiment in one world government - and there now some nations there are panicking and changing their structures to ward off a loss of sovereignty caused by recent EU power grabs. It will be attempted more in the future
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Jul 13, 2009 9:22 am) 
|
|
|
Replying to: larsb (Jul 13, 2009 9:16 am) Cap n Trade will run even more businesses out of the US into the arms of China. Al Gore does not give a hoot. He has a mansion, jet and 100' house boat with a $100 million for fuel. He is not trying to run a business with a bunch of leeches telling him his toilets are not up to code or he has to completely revamp his factory to meet the new tougher regulations. Sounds good unless you were one of the people working there when he says screw it, I cannot afford to do business in the USA. That is just one aspect of why the whole climate bill is bad for America. If you have a global governing body. They can dictate anything they like which makes it a one World Government. We have Friends in Greece in the Government. They are trying to rid themselves of the Euro and all the crap the EU is trying to pull.
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Jul 13, 2009 10:46 am)  I'll see your Kyoto and raise you Montreal. (I'll believe one world government when I see California simply put together a budget).
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?
