Sign In Join 



Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?

6790 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 7:44 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 576 of 679
1
...
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
...
679
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5750 of 6790
Re: More evidence [gagrice] by ruking1
Jul 09, 2009 (3:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jul 09, 2009 1:49 pm)

Indeed it is cheaper to build a 1.5B dollar coal fired plant than to construct WIND farms which even the environmentalist profess to "PREFER" over coal. IMAGINE that !!??
#5751 of 6790
Re: More evidence [ruking1] by steve_ HOST
Jul 09, 2009 (5:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Jul 09, 2009 3:33 pm)

I'm afraid you can't lump all the enviros together when you talk about wind farms. The birders aren't wild about them you know.
 
And you have to wonder how cheap the new coal plants will be to build once a carbon tax is in place.
#5752 of 6790
Re: More evidence [steve_] by ruking1
Jul 09, 2009 (5:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jul 09, 2009 5:00 pm)

..."I'm afraid you can't lump all the enviros together when you talk about wind farms."...
 
The only ones that matter are the ones who have successfully gotten in the way !! So no, I am not talking about ALL....
 
..."And you have to wonder how cheap the new coal plants will be to build once a carbon tax is in place. "...
 
Right and how much C02 will the wind and solar farms save that were NOT built !!??
 
As I have said all along ( this is a graphic demonstration that) the first and foremost priority has been to increase the cost (per measured unit) of power !! CO2 discharge has always been a myth.
#5753 of 6790
Re: More evidence [ruking1] by steve_ HOST
Jul 09, 2009 (5:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Jul 09, 2009 5:39 pm)

the first and foremost priority has been to increase the cost (per measured unit) of power !!
 
Well, that idea has been out there as a conservation measure and as a way to wean the US off of foreign oil.
 
Is a Higher Gasoline Tax Good Or Bad For America?
 
GM is going btw. (link)
#5754 of 6790
Re: More evidence [steve_] by ruking1
Jul 09, 2009 (6:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jul 09, 2009 5:46 pm)

Right and the higher the cost, the higher the percentage of imported oil! It is at the costliest that it has ever been and we import more of if than ever before and it will go even higher as we raise the price. So seemingly it.... is working !!!
 
Oh yes and they need to spend hundreds of millions to change the logo !!!! As you can tell, it is being run better already !!
#5755 of 6790
Re: More evidence [steve_] by houdini1
Jul 10, 2009 (7:41 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jul 09, 2009 5:00 pm)

The carbon tax has a long way to go before it becomes a law and I do not see it happening.
 
There is a new developing technology that uses pure oxygen rather than just normal air to burn coal. It produces virtually 0 harmful emissions and is supposed to be perfect for coal fired generating plants. Many current plants could be retrofitted. With about 500 years worth of coal within our borders this is great news...but I can already hear the wind and solar activists screaming that we will use up all the oxygen.
#5756 of 6790
Re: More evidence [houdini1] by steve_ HOST
Jul 10, 2009 (10:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: houdini1 (Jul 10, 2009 7:41 pm)

They won't be screaming if they can't breathe, lol.
 
New York Governor Encourages Unique Clean Coal Plant (Environment News Service)
 
Cleaner burning is good. Doesn't address all the mining impacts though.
#5757 of 6790
Re: More evidence [steve_] by cwalti
Jul 10, 2009 (10:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jul 10, 2009 10:01 pm)

   
 
>>>>
 
...and the source of the purified oxygen for that matter...
#5758 of 6790
Re: More evidence [steve_] by houdini1
Jul 11, 2009 (3:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jul 10, 2009 10:01 pm)

See what I mean...the nitpicking has started. Does solar or wind address the mfg costs, disposal costs, labor costs, protest costs, etc?
 
Nothing that I know of just magically appears out of thin air. There are always compromises. The idea for our energy needs has to be a balance between cost, efficiency, and environmental friendliness.
 
If we truly want to stop financing our enemies with oil money, clean coal is our only practical answer.
#5759 of 6790
Re: More evidence [houdini1] by gagrice
Jul 11, 2009 (5:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: houdini1 (Jul 11, 2009 3:59 am)

Practical is the key word. I think some of the Democrats in Congress with a few brain cells left are coming to the same conclusion. You cannot please all the eco nuts in the country. No matter what you do it is going to be a compromise somewhere. When I was a kid hydro was the ultimate source of energy. Clean power. Now it is considered worse than coal by all the river rat environmentalists. And it does have some big negatives.
 
We have the coal. We should use it in a responsible way. If we need more, they can drain Lake Powell and use the 1000 year supply covered with water. When someone comes up with a practical 24/7 power source phase out fossil fuel generation. If we do start using electric vehicles solar will be pretty much useless charging your car overnight. Both wind and solar are VERY limited as to where they will produce adequate energy to be practical. In spite of the hoopla surrounding them. So far most of our local projects for wind and solar have been shot down by several well meaning groups. We need more electricity or a massive war to eliminate a lot of users.

Messages Page 576 of 679
1
...
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
...
679
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement