Sign In Join 



Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?

6727 messages,  Last post on Nov 05, 2009 at 2:29 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 456 of 673
1
...
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
...
673
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4550 of 6727
Re: Another blow to GW today [bpeebles] by houdini1
Jan 05, 2009 (5:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bpeebles (Jan 05, 2009 4:10 pm)

Good intelligent posters who can think for themselves are always needed on this forum. I hope you stick around.
#4551 of 6727
Re: Another blow to GW today [bpeebles] by oldfarmer50
Jan 06, 2009 (9:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: bpeebles (Jan 05, 2009 4:10 pm)

"...that sea-ice is covering more square miles than it has in 28 years..."
 
Don't worry the CC cultists have an answer for that. It seems that this new ice is the "wrong kind" of ice and is prone to melting away.
 
Now, how these folks know what kind of ice was there in 1979, I don't know. Maybe it was certified organic ice which has a different chemistry than this new modern ice.
#4552 of 6727
Re: Another blow to GW today [oldfarmer50] by steve_ HOST
Jan 06, 2009 (9:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Jan 06, 2009 9:01 am)

They probably have core samples going back decades that show the thickness too. The stories are reporting satellite observations. Seems like there should be some older data out there too.
 
"Why were predictions so wrong? Researchers had expected the newer sea ice, which is thinner, to be less resilient and melt easier. Instead, the thinner ice had less snow cover to insulate it from the bitterly cold air, and therefore grew much faster than expected, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center."
 
Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979 (Daily Tech)
 
In other matters, it appears there is a difference in terminology:
 
"According to the National Academy of Sciences, the phrase climate change encompasses changes in temperature, precipitation and wind lasting for an extended period of time. While global warming refers to an increase in the temperature at the atmosphere near the earth's surface."
 
Climate Change versus Global Warming (Muncie Green)
#4553 of 6727
Re: Another blow to GW today [steve_] by alltorque
Jan 06, 2009 (9:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jan 06, 2009 9:07 am)

So now you understand why it's Climate Change not just Global Warming. Anything changes - ever - and it's our fault. Neat, but a tad contrived, (it must be if I can see through it; or perhaps thirty four years working for big oil endows one with a certain scepticism ? And also a tremendous respect for that industry, I have to say).
 
Would welcome a little GW right now; it's chilly here and Russia is playing silly beggars with natural gas supplies.
#4554 of 6727
A more dire threat than Climate Change by kernick
Jan 06, 2009 (9:59 am)
Reply
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2009-01-01-mammothimpact_N.htm
 
I really think that whether GW (or Climate Change or whatever the vogue word of the day is) is 1%, 10%, or 25% contribution by man, that we spend our energy and resources on the more important threats to the environment.
 
As theorized in that article, these impacts set fire to the entire continent of North America! We need to have our scientiic resources focused on these planet-killer threats, not running around trying to figure out the small part man has in putting CO2 in the air. Or how to stop a 1C increase! There aren't many resources right now focused on detecting or stopping these sorts of comet/asteroid collisions.
 
To me spending money on GW is like worrying about what is causing a skin-rash, when you really should be focusing on preventing a heart-attack. But since we have some sort of "religious" subconcious-psych-issue going with "man is bad", and "we must repent for sins against nature", we spend time worrying about the less important issues.
#4555 of 6727
Re: A more dire threat than Climate Change [kernick] by steve_ HOST
Jan 06, 2009 (10:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: kernick (Jan 06, 2009 9:59 am)

1C increase is sort of like talking about extending a wheelbase one inch. It can make a lot of difference in how the car rides and handles, even thought it seems like a "small" number.
 
Skin rashes can be fatal too.
#4556 of 6727
Re: A more dire threat than Climate Change [steve_] by kernick
Jan 06, 2009 (11:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jan 06, 2009 10:41 am)

Since so many species thrive in the warmer tropics, and the density of living organisms is highest in the tropics, I don't see how you could say that these small amounts of warming being discussed would be detrimental to the overall benefit of life.
 
A 1C or few C rise in temperature would allow more organisms to thrive in wider parts of the globe. On the other hand the natural planet-killer events will wipe-out most large species either immediately, or make the climate harsh for years and kill the initial survivors that way.
 
I have 0% chance of dying from GW in the next decades; my chances of dying from a planet-killer are similar to buying a lottery ticket each day. I'd prefer any GW-research-$ be used for scanning the skies, and developing technology to prevent impacts.
#4557 of 6727
Re: A more dire threat than Climate Change [kernick] by steve_ HOST
Jan 06, 2009 (11:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: kernick (Jan 06, 2009 11:32 am)

Things like bark beetles also thrive with milder winters. Lots of spruce trees up in the far north are dying due to stuff like that, and the habitat changes that are resulting aren't necessarily an improvement.
 
Oh, NASA is tracking some 1,000 potentially hazardous asteroids.
#4558 of 6727
Re: A more dire threat than Climate Change [steve_] by grbeck
Jan 06, 2009 (12:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jan 06, 2009 11:45 am)

Look at the bright side.
 
If an asteroid hits, we won't have to worry about bark beetles, climate change or even another episode of Rosie O'Donnell's variety show.
#4559 of 6727
Re: A more dire threat than Climate Change [grbeck] by steve_ HOST
Jan 06, 2009 (1:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: grbeck (Jan 06, 2009 12:40 pm)

I thought her new show folded on opening night (GW killed my TV, luckily).
 
You know NASA is going to solve the asteroid issue by putting a few hyperspace shooters in orbit.

Messages Page 456 of 673
1
...
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
...
673
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement