Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?
6945 messages, Last post on Dec 03, 2009 at 9:36 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Dec 28, 2008 7:19 am) You are probably right. And he was one of the few that did not grab onto the carbon credit taxing scheme and run with it. |
|
|
"You have to think that global warming denialist Matt Drudge must be getting desperate when he touts a column by Christopher "White asbestos is harmless" Booker arguing that winter has disproved man-made global warming:" Study the graph and you too can be a Climate Data Analyst.  Deltoid |
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Dec 30, 2008 7:33 am)  Shows a definite warming trend. Something is making the air warmer. |
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Dec 30, 2008 7:33 am) I hate to get all logical on Booker, but none of this has anything to do with a disproof of AGW. Even if you accept his premise that we can't afford to reduce emissions, it does not follow that emissions are not causing warming. Nor does his argument prove that man is the major cause of the changes in Climate. My contention is now and has been since day one. If man is the cause of climate change, that change would be going up in a linear fashion. I think it is safe to say we have created more GHG this year than last around the globe. And more last year than the year before. Yet the global temperatures are not going all up as would be logical. Even if the scientist have made a case for the Global Temperatures rising over the last 28 years. It is not in step with the rise in man made GHG. Leading me to believe as others do, that we are a very insignificant part of Climate Change. I think the desperation is on the part of the CC followers. They have no practical solution to cutting GHG. Yet they burn tons of carbon flying around the world having parties, conferences, concerts etc, trying to get the masses to buy into their theory. What can the masses do. You think the billions of Chinese and Indians are going to cut back their progress after a hundred years of watching the rest of the World living it up. Do you think Americans will buy into more than a pittance of cutting back on what they produce in the course of trying to survive in a hostile economy. I am just too much of a Pragmatist to buy into this whole idea. |
|
|
Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 7:48 am) 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 7:48 am) Yeah, like the fact that the thermometer is now hanging in front of a sky-scraper instead of uncle Jeb's barn like it was in 1920.
|
|
|
Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Dec 30, 2008 8:39 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 30, 2008 8:47 am) |
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Dec 30, 2008 8:56 am) Yugo? Really? Are they even for sale anymore? If there ANYONE out there saying "drive the smallest car available?" No. Drive the least polluting car that makes sense for your family and fits your budget and needs. "Push all the little people into high rise apartments?" Is anyone anywhere doing that? That was an urban restructuring plan from the 1960s. No one of any consequence is preaching that anymore. "Stinking Bus?" Have you ridden a city bus in a major city LATELY? I have - in San Fran and in Phoenix. And in neither case was the bus "stinky." And the "Grand Canyon" is not nearly as "Grand" as it used to be. Pollution has diminished the views. I was there in March 2008. So let's not get silly. "Control the masses" is ridiculous as a statement and totally misaligned with American public policy. |
|
|
Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 9:06 am) I want a turbo diesel SUV that gets 30-40 mpg!! THEY STILL do not let them in!!!!! However they allow flex fuel E85 suv's that gets 25% less than the like model gassers 20 mpg or 15 mpg or less !!! The numbers belie the realities !!! ..."No one of any consequence is preaching that anymore. "... Well a lot of it is policy !!! It is literally improbable to build a single family house in this municipality. Do you want to build a 500 unit condo/apt complex, high rise low rise? It is almost no problem !!! What do you think has greater impacts a family of 4 or 500 familes of 4? Indeed it has been the opposing views that has served as the reality tests/counter points for some of these uncorrelated hypothesis', aka dogmas. I just saw a PBS program (Private Foundation sponsored) on "Swimming the Hudson River" . While I am sure it was unintentional, it was not a good graphic or commentary on the effects of the 300 year NYC experiences !!! Seems like they could sent NYC to the moon so to speak and it would still take the surrounding areas 100s of years to heal. Emotionally, it was depressing to watch. We went to GC, AZ in the late Aug- mid Sep time frame. It was absolutely GLORIOUS, sans the ride there. It rained literally cats and dogs (4 inches in 6 hours) all the way from Las Vegas, NV, but when it was time to take the 22 passenger plane ride, God did the Moses routine and the weather factors coalesced into some of the most spectacular views !! It was a very bumpy ride (even the two pilots held onto their hand rails), but totally spectacular !! |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
