Sign In Join 



Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?

6874 messages,  Last post on Nov 30, 2009 at 2:04 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 453 of 688
1
...
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
...
688
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4518 of 6874
Re: 2008 was the year man-made global warming was disproved [gagrice] by oldfarmer50
Dec 28, 2008 (7:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 27, 2008 5:18 pm)

"...Well Big Al it was worth a try..."
 
I wonder, in a few years, when it finally sinks in to the heads of the masses that they have been the victims of a scam that makes Maddoff's Ponzi scheme look pale in comparison, who will take the blame?
 
Will the public rail against the media that spread the lies to get better ratings? Will there be a backlash against the grant whore enviro groups and scientists? Or will they demand the heads of the gutless politicians who sold the economy down the river to get a few votes.
 
My guess is they will find some way to blame it on Bush.
#4519 of 6874
Re: 2008 was the year man-made global warming was disproved [oldfarmer50] by gagrice
Dec 28, 2008 (8:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Dec 28, 2008 7:19 am)

My guess is they will find some way to blame it on Bush
 
You are probably right. And he was one of the few that did not grab onto the carbon credit taxing scheme and run with it.
#4520 of 6874
too quiet in here by steve_ HOST
Dec 30, 2008 (7:33 am)
Reply
"You have to think that global warming denialist Matt Drudge must be getting desperate when he touts a column by Christopher "White asbestos is harmless" Booker arguing that winter has disproved man-made global warming:"
 
Study the graph and you too can be a Climate Data Analyst.
 
Deltoid
#4521 of 6874
Re: too quiet in here [steve_] by larsb
Dec 30, 2008 (7:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 30, 2008 7:33 am)

I love this chart:
 

 
Shows a definite warming trend. Something is making the air warmer.
#4522 of 6874
Re: too quiet in here [steve_] by gagrice
Dec 30, 2008 (7:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 30, 2008 7:33 am)

Looking at the air temp chart raises questions. Why if the ocean is 80% of the contribution to global temperatures, is it not included in the graph. It gets back to temperature gauge placement.
 
I hate to get all logical on Booker, but none of this has anything to do with a disproof of AGW. Even if you accept his premise that we can't afford to reduce emissions, it does not follow that emissions are not causing warming.
 
Nor does his argument prove that man is the major cause of the changes in Climate. My contention is now and has been since day one. If man is the cause of climate change, that change would be going up in a linear fashion. I think it is safe to say we have created more GHG this year than last around the globe. And more last year than the year before. Yet the global temperatures are not going all up as would be logical.
 
Even if the scientist have made a case for the Global Temperatures rising over the last 28 years. It is not in step with the rise in man made GHG. Leading me to believe as others do, that we are a very insignificant part of Climate Change.
 
I think the desperation is on the part of the CC followers. They have no practical solution to cutting GHG. Yet they burn tons of carbon flying around the world having parties, conferences, concerts etc, trying to get the masses to buy into their theory. What can the masses do. You think the billions of Chinese and Indians are going to cut back their progress after a hundred years of watching the rest of the World living it up. Do you think Americans will buy into more than a pittance of cutting back on what they produce in the course of trying to survive in a hostile economy. I am just too much of a Pragmatist to buy into this whole idea.
#4523 of 6874
Re: too quiet in here [larsb] by gagrice
Dec 30, 2008 (8:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 7:48 am)

I like this one as it shows the truth just the plain truth. Not some optimized chart that cherry picked the dates to make the case for GW/CC.
 
#4524 of 6874
Re: too quiet in here [larsb] by oldfarmer50
Dec 30, 2008 (8:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 7:48 am)

"...Something is making the air warmer..."
 
Yeah, like the fact that the thermometer is now hanging in front of a sky-scraper instead of uncle Jeb's barn like it was in 1920.
#4525 of 6874
Re: too quiet in here [oldfarmer50] by ruking1
Dec 30, 2008 (8:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Dec 30, 2008 8:39 am)

That is correct. It is well known in urban planning circles about the climate change (in the vicinity of high rise to sky-scrapers) effect on the local temperatures and weather. It can be on the order of 30 degrees more.
#4526 of 6874
Re: too quiet in here [ruking1] by gagrice
Dec 30, 2008 (8:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 30, 2008 8:47 am)

It is all part of a grand plan to control the masses. Making people feel guilty has been used forever to gain political power. Gore tried during the 1990s and failed. There is new hope with a liberal Congress and President to get their way. Push all the little people into high rise apartments and let them go to work on a stinking bus. Force the rest of US into a Yugo sized piece of crap car. All done by GUILT. To save the planet. For what? Is my question. If it is not for the enjoyment of man what good is the planet? There is NOTHING enjoyable about driving a Yugo cross country to visit the Grand Canyon.
#4527 of 6874
Re: too quiet in here [gagrice] by larsb
Dec 30, 2008 (9:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 30, 2008 8:56 am)

Gary, PLEASE, can a few of the DRAMATICS be reduced here?
 
Yugo? Really? Are they even for sale anymore? If there ANYONE out there saying "drive the smallest car available?" No. Drive the least polluting car that makes sense for your family and fits your budget and needs.
 
"Push all the little people into high rise apartments?" Is anyone anywhere doing that? That was an urban restructuring plan from the 1960s. No one of any consequence is preaching that anymore.
 
"Stinking Bus?" Have you ridden a city bus in a major city LATELY? I have - in San Fran and in Phoenix. And in neither case was the bus "stinky."
 
And the "Grand Canyon" is not nearly as "Grand" as it used to be. Pollution has diminished the views. I was there in March 2008.
 
So let's not get silly. "Control the masses" is ridiculous as a statement and totally misaligned with American public policy.

Messages Page 453 of 688
1
...
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
...
688
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement