Sign In Join 



Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?

6727 messages,  Last post on Nov 05, 2009 at 2:29 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 451 of 674
1
...
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
...
674
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4492 of 6727
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [larsb] by houdini1
Dec 22, 2008 (12:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 22, 2008 7:21 am)

Larsb, I agree with you. The problem is that it is the global warming devotees who are making a big deal of this. Others of us on this forum are acting in a strictly defensive mode and trying to reason with them.
 
People just can't start presenting theories and misinformation as scientific fact and expect others not to oppose/expose them. Don't you agree?
#4493 of 6727
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [houdini1] by larsb
Dec 22, 2008 (12:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: houdini1 (Dec 22, 2008 12:10 pm)

Well, I agree that the "The Sky Is Falling" attitude is the wrong attitude.
 
But so is "Poo Poo, Man has no effect at all" the wrong attitude.
 
What got me leaning the "Pro-GW" way in the first place was not AlGore or any of his ilk. ( He and his Carbon Credits can bite me.)
 
It was simply reading the NASA temperature records and noticing how from 1980-2007, 23 of the 28 years had been "above the norm" since measurements started in 1880.
 
And yes, I KNOW THAT'S A SMALL SAMPLING. I'm not going to get into that fact.
 
What it DOES show me is a trend of warmth. I'd like to know the cause of the trend. If it's something Man is doing, then let's try to fix it. If not, let's find out what it is.
 
Regardless, we need to be better stewards of our planet, or the aliens might send Klaatu and Gort down to erase us.
#4494 of 6727
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [larsb] by oldfarmer50
Dec 22, 2008 (4:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 22, 2008 7:21 am)

"...no one can know the complete, full, true impact of man's activities..."
 
And yet there are some who would bankrupt us individually and our country as a whole based on this incomplete and most likely, bogus theory.
 
Let's put it in to another context.
 
Let's say that creation scientists proclaim that if we all don't fall in line behind their theory, the earth will be doomed. In addition these creationists say we should levy an "evolution tax" upon all people even if this means some of them will starve. It's for their own good, they will say, because "we creationists have a consensus that our way is the right way".
 
Now let's say that the creationist's friends in the news media label everyone who disagrees as a "denier" and dismisses everything they have to say.
 
Wouldn't it be frightening to live in a world like that?
#4495 of 6727
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [oldfarmer50] by houdini1
Dec 22, 2008 (6:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Dec 22, 2008 4:12 pm)

Now that is a good one to cogitate on !!!
#4496 of 6727
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [oldfarmer50] by gagrice
Dec 22, 2008 (8:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Dec 22, 2008 4:12 pm)

because "we creationists have a consensus that our way is the right way".
 
Food for thought. I would say more people in the World believe in Creation by a higher being than believe in GW/CC caused by man. In fact the very small minority that believe we are doomed if we don't all pay into the Carbon Credit scam, are wielding a mighty big stick over the rest of us. Anyone claiming a consensus of opinion, is not to be trusted. It just means they, and a few friends have this theory. I am sure that many of the scientist that believe in the CC by man theory are sincere. That does not make them right.
#4497 of 6727
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [gagrice] by kernick
Dec 23, 2008 (4:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 22, 2008 8:06 pm)

Maybe I can combine those theories, and say that because God is all good, he would never let us get in real trouble, and if the CO2 level gets too high, and it is too much of a problem, all we have to do is pray,and God will put the CO2 back where it naturally belongs. No problem! No sense us humans worrying a lot about something that God can fix in a blink of an eye.
#4498 of 6727
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [kernick] by alltorque
Dec 23, 2008 (6:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: kernick (Dec 23, 2008 4:54 am)

Nice thought, Kernick............even with the smilie. Now let me see. Who do I have more faith in ? God or Gore & his disciples. Hmmm. Tough one (not). Well, it begins with G.................but only has 3 letters. Sorry, Al, witchdoctors and shamen are not my style.
 
In case I don't post before..............may I wish a Merry Christmas and a Happy, Healthy and Peaceful New Year to all you fellow CC heretics, (oh, O.K., and the rest as well).
#4499 of 6727
I'd dump my 10 year old Quest for $4,000 by steve_ HOST
Dec 23, 2008 (11:45 am)
Reply
"A double-barreled idea that could help clean up our air and give a breath of life to a gasping auto industry is being pushed by the top Democrat and Republican on the House Energy and Air Quality Subcommittee."
 
'Cash For Clunkers' Program Would Make Sense -- If Approached Sensibly (Green Car Advisor)
 
#4500 of 6727
Re: I'd dump my 10 year old Quest for $4,000 [steve_] by ruking1
Dec 23, 2008 (12:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 23, 2008 11:45 am)

While pictures/videos like these make for good graphics to good "passion" plays, the realites are FAR more wasteful. Municipalities concede by way of advertisement (report gross pollution cars) that a small minority of neglected cars (less than 1-5%) cause the majority of cause the MAJORITY of "OUT OF LAW" pollution ! Indeed there is no reason why a (for example) 10 year old car should have absolutely NO issues in passing smog only emissions tests and do so beyond (for example) out to the 30 year mark.
 
The other side of this is what is the cost (dollars and greenhouse gas emissions, etc) to manufacture something (new) EVERY year rather than keeping something 10 years (and beyond) ? So for example if I decided to buy say new every 5 years I would have bought 6 vehicles instead of 2
 
This might fall into the current heretical articles, but the current (dismal) new car market is really telling how many new cars are a tad over "necessary" again for example 10 M yearly/254.1 M US market= app less than 4%. Bascially 6M to 6.5 M folks would find it a no brainer to keep their current cars for at least another 6 months.
#4501 of 6727
Re: I'd dump my 10 year old Quest for $4,000 [ruking1] by gagrice
Dec 23, 2008 (12:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 23, 2008 12:20 pm)

Our 19 year old Lexus LS400 passed with flying colors this year. Though the $4000 is tempting for our old Lexus. I don't think I could get anything I would want right now. If there was a new vehicle I wanted on the market I would buy it. No more screaming 4 or 6 cylinder gas engines for me. If the Lexus were to have a major failure I would probably buy the VW TDI Sportwagen to replace it. Not perfect but better than any gasser for running errands and shopping.

Messages Page 451 of 674
1
...
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
...
674
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement