Sign In Join 



Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?

6844 messages,  Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 8:00 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 450 of 686
1
...
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
...
686
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4483 of 6844
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [ruking1] by gagrice
Dec 22, 2008 (7:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 22, 2008 7:09 am)

That site gives you a close look at ALL the research. Not just the reports politicians edit to push their agenda. I found this page interesting in it shows the warming trend with and without volcanic eruptions.
 
As 2008 nears an end, there are a lot of folks waiting to see where the final number is going to come in for this year’s global average temperature. It’s likely that the average temperature for 2008 will fall below the value for 2007 and quite possibly be the coldest year of the (official) 21st century. 2008 will add another to the growing recent string of years during which time global average temperatures have not risen. Does this mean that pressure of “global warming” fuelled by increasing greenhouse gas emissions from human activity has abated?
 
The answer is a qualified “no”—it seems that natural variations have been flexing their muscles and offsetting anthropogenic warming.

 
http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2008/12/17/recent-temperature-trends- -in-context/#more-355
#4484 of 6844
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [larsb] by gagrice
Dec 22, 2008 (7:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 22, 2008 7:21 am)

Fact is, no one can know the complete, full, true impact of man's activities on the global climate.
 
It looks like this year your "Hockey Stick" GW chart will get a workout. Lots of frozen places to play hockey.
 
You can discount solid evidence all you like. That is what debate is all about. I am just a voice for reality. It is only the global warming fanatics that are not interested in facts. The rest of US want to see data backed up by more data. Even then the issue is so large that it will be difficult to make any kind of judgment that is without room for debate.
 
So in response. No one can truly know how little man contributes to the changes in Global Climate. I personally would be surprised if it is more than 5%. Which means all the hand wringing and wasted resources will have less than a negligible affect on the Arctic ice melting.
#4485 of 6844
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [larsb] by ruking1
Dec 22, 2008 (7:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 22, 2008 7:21 am)

Based upon your second sentence you seem to have either a scotch o r cognac attidue (afficionado) never know what the "angels" had to go through to get the BREW ha ha !
#4486 of 6844
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [gagrice] by larsb
Dec 22, 2008 (7:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 22, 2008 7:33 am)

Gary says, "You can discount solid evidence all you like."

Just following your lead.
 
You refuse to even admit that historical temperature records are correct !!! How's that for "discounting solid evidence?"
#4487 of 6844
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [larsb] by steve_ HOST
Dec 22, 2008 (7:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 22, 2008 7:54 am)

Let's step back from the personal stuff. Besides, he's up to 5% so progress is being made.
 
We all may as well take a 4 week breather - assuming Obama's science appointments are all confirmed, there's going to be a lot of fresh arguments on the table.
#4488 of 6844
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [steve_] by gagrice
Dec 22, 2008 (8:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 22, 2008 7:59 am)

I have never been one to discount man's pollution on our rivers and air. I did survive the early years in Los Angeles when you could not breath for the leaded gas exhaust.
 
My problem is with those that think we can change the Global temperatures significantly. I also detest the alarmist that would have me drive a Yugo so they can live in an 11,000 square foot mansion and use 10 times as much electricity as I do. Or have a 100 foot long house boat with many times the carbon impact as my modest home. It is not the Larsb's of the country I have a problem with. It is the "Do as I say, Not as I DO" GW alarmists from NYC, Washington DC and Hollywood, I have an issue with.
#4489 of 6844
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [larsb] by ruking1
Dec 22, 2008 (8:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 22, 2008 7:54 am)

THE HUGE issue/s (to me) is/are the Global winter a sists folks went from a GLOBAL winter (scant 40 years ago) to now GLOBAL WARMING (recently) to AGAIN GLOBAL (monsters) CLIMATE change: with absolutely no correlated cause/effect relational explanations for the TRANSITIONS, other than other than they continually get their noses PINGED and I am sure they are tired of the nose pingings/breakings. So basically it was a struggle to get descriptive langage; so when ANYTHING happens: its global "whatever". We used to call this magical thinking! (world is flat) The real reasons both for/against is ECONOMIC !!
 
So now (since we kilt GOD) it's mudder hood, muddled nature, apple pie, global climate change. Again I have no problem with a passenger vehicle that runs on H20 and a tank lasting almost a lifetime. It is just not on the market and for obvious reasons. Our continuing to ignore the US being literally exponentially better than the Saudia Arabia of COAL: we do at our own peril and extreme threat to our own national security.
#4490 of 6844
This weather is adding up ... by kernick
Dec 22, 2008 (9:26 am)
Reply
to soon being climate. It seems that it is not just one area on one day that is colder than normal, as proponents of GW love to use that excuse to dismiss new data!
 
http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Deroy+Murdock%3a+Baby%2c+it%27s- +cold+outside%2c+no+matter+what+Al+Gore+says&articleId=b5668d53-404e-4f91-9356-9- 1cba0117933
 
Because of this continued "GW" my combustion of fosil fuels is increasing (running low on wood, and just ordered 200 gal of oil). Snow from Nov - April (6 months) year after year does not convince me of any GW!
#4491 of 6844
Ghengis Khan (of the Mongols fame) evidently didnt get the word by ruking1
Dec 22, 2008 (11:01 am)
Reply
"Founded by Mongols in the time of Ghengis Kahn, the town of"...
 
link title
#4492 of 6844
Re: A 2,000-Year Global Temperature Record [larsb] by houdini1
Dec 22, 2008 (12:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 22, 2008 7:21 am)

Larsb, I agree with you. The problem is that it is the global warming devotees who are making a big deal of this. Others of us on this forum are acting in a strictly defensive mode and trying to reason with them.
 
People just can't start presenting theories and misinformation as scientific fact and expect others not to oppose/expose them. Don't you agree?

Messages Page 450 of 686
1
...
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
...
686
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement