Sign In Join 



Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?

6790 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 7:44 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 447 of 679
1
...
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
...
679
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4461 of 6790
Re: Problems with the models [gagrice] by ruking1
Dec 20, 2008 (8:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 20, 2008 7:39 am)

Indeed we know that folks do believe in: ding a butterfly cause an Indonesian Tsunami!! We are reasonably asking: how many butterflys did you really ding to GET the Tsunami!!!!! (Hopefully I have put the concept in babblistic terms)
 
Indeed with the BIG IV auto bail out, down payment (many more payments to follow) not only is the writing on the wall, it is now in the monument shop being engraved in STONE. Not one of the 4 has identified the new cash cow, and by default it WILL remain the SUV/pick up truck.
 
"Burning more while professing that folks should burn less" will remain the policy as well as the reality. Seriousness will be demostrated when SUV's/Trucks are on the market that can actually get 30-35 mpg and UP: be it turbo diesel or other.Turbo diesels are just the most logical and actually stand the best chance of achieving the actual goal of... using less (20-40% currently over RUG to PUG) .
 
It makes now all the sense in the world to keep a 15 year old SUV,... 15 more years!!! By then maybe there WILL be an SUV on the market that will get 30-40 mpg or better. I was hoping for an SUV/pick up truck that runs on H20 by that time frame !!!!...NOT !!!
#4462 of 6790
Re: Problems with the models [ruking1] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Dec 20, 2008 (8:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 20, 2008 5:30 am)

Actually the Big Three are going broke because they make cars nobody wants. You don't have to blame unions, environmentalists, or anybody else. The simplest and best answer stares us in the face I think. Japan and Germany take care of their workers very well indeed and they aren't facing disaster, and their modest shift to alternative and clean energy sources hasn't brought their automakers to the brink of calamity either.
 
It's the very CONFUSION about the "right answer" that worries me the most---what do we do, if anything, until we find out what's really going on? And, will we find out too late what's going on? Or will we go off in the wrong direction of what's going on?
 
This is why I trust science in matters of this particular sort (matters in which science is appropriate) ---the truth will out and cut across any political or attitudinal lines eventually.
 
it all takes time. Mankind doesn't learn easily or quickly.
 
As for the Big Three, even if their corporate boards have no believe whatsoever in global warming (that's fine), they had best pay attention to changing attitudes about clean technology and fuel efficiency.
 
The GW debate has sparked an increase in consciousness about man's effects on the climate and the environment so I see it ALL as a good thing.
#4463 of 6790
Re: Problems with the models [Mr_Shiftright] by ruking1
Dec 20, 2008 (9:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 20, 2008 8:43 am)

ALL were asleep at the wheel, or more than likely; all playing "CHICKEN". They all are now at or have come to the trough. The CEO's have done the $1.00 per year gig. The union walked away with their $75 per hour intact. There is NO/NONE/NADA motivation to change!!!! They other than SUV/pick up trucks, the USA market wants. they still have not demonstrated the ability to switch over the American consumer and hold those other than SUV/pick up truck markets that they seek. Incidently as you know by Edmunds data the big three suv/trucks have been and remain wonderful sellers !!! So I would categorically reject the notion they make cars no body wants. Indeed untill recently SUV/PU Trucks have been THE most profitable segments !! Almost bar none.
#4464 of 6790
Re: Problems with the models [ruking1] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Dec 20, 2008 (9:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am)

Well you can reject the notion if you want to, but obviously the Big Three's declining market share year after year for decades suggests that selling pickup trucks is not a very good business model regardless.
 
The question is not how many of X you sell---the questions are: a) did you make any profit? and b) was the product good enough to inspire a repeat buyer? and c) is your competition catching up with you?
#4465 of 6790
Re: Problems with the models [Mr_Shiftright] by ruking1
Dec 20, 2008 (9:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 20, 2008 9:38 am)

Thanks for making the points for me !!!! Our legislature fell for the "chicken" routine (threat of lost JOBS, aka voting process bought by UAW monies) !! HELLO !! we GAVE them the down payments !!!! How the hell they NOW get off vilifying the big 3 ceo's who caved and will continue to cave to the UAW!?
 
To borrow an Iaccocca line: we have jobs lower per hour rates and NONE at higher per hour rates! The Congress pretty much said you have a job at the HIGHER dollar rates, just higher the newbies at the lower rates!!!! WE OK NOW !!!!????
 
So yeah I am just waiting to buy my American car with a IRS tax credit $15,000 and a discount voucher for 10-15k. Why shouldn't the real owners get the bene's !???
#4466 of 6790
Re: Problems with the models [ruking1] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Dec 20, 2008 (10:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 20, 2008 9:40 am)

It still comes down to uncompetitive products. The UAW didn't design the cars, it just bolts them together like workers everywhere do.
 
I didn't notice that AIG had any labor rate restrictions placed on them when they got their $$$.
 
the government forced business into being health car providers in the first place, way back when.
 
The problem is that America does not view health care as a basic human need or right, and so this problem will just continue to fester.
 
Personally, I think a healthy and contented workforce is going to be absolutely necessary in the 21st century's struggle for economic success among nations.
 
Socialism works great for the NBA and NFL. I don't see why the Big Three can't do it.
 
#4467 of 6790
Re: Problems with the models [Mr_Shiftright] by ruking1
Dec 20, 2008 (10:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 20, 2008 10:34 am)

..."I didn't notice that AIG had any labor rate restrictions placed on them when they got their $$$. "...
 
Well comrade, shoots down the evolution theory eh?
 
Since we are on vehicles, hard to be profitable when labor is 2x the competition eh? Again really not a problem if they can sell the typical (there is no typical) for discussion purposes 40k suv for 80k and the competition (you know the ones with the lower labor rates) keeps selling theirs at 40k???? I am sure it does not take much explanation to know where that would go...????
#4468 of 6790
Re: Problems with the models [ruking1] by ruking1
Dec 20, 2008 (10:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 20, 2008 10:41 am)

Socialism works great for the NBA and NFL. I don't see why the Big Three can't do it.
 
Well those examples are already monopolies and the unions, aka UAW are also. How far do you think you'd get as an "independent" union if say the UAW was YOUR competition!?
#4469 of 6790
Re: Problems with the models [Mr_Shiftright] by kernick
Dec 20, 2008 (11:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 20, 2008 8:43 am)

It's the very CONFUSION about the "right answer" that worries me the most---what do we do, if anything, until we find out what's really going on?
 
Well if science wants an issue, and we want to throw money at something, Maybe people on the East Coast would like something done about this.
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/mega_tsunami.shtml
 
Or something more serious which all you have to do is look at the moon. GW is insignificant compared to the environmental change a major comet or asteroid impact would make. I'd rather see the money that is and would be spent on GW put towards finding and defending against these hazards.
 
These are known, proven hazards, not a minor issue of warming a few degrees - which I for one would find beneficial.
#4470 of 6790
Re: Problems with the models [kernick] by gagrice
Dec 20, 2008 (11:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: kernick (Dec 20, 2008 11:09 am)

not a minor issue of warming a few degrees - which I for one would find beneficial.
 
Just like a politician. They have been promising it would get warmer for close to 20 years. All we get is snow in Vegas and Malibu. Big Liars. How many people were killed in the earthquake and tsunami back in 2004. Many of those countries did not even have Tsunami warning systems in place. So more than 225,000 people died as a result of poor planning. There is no need to plan for a rise in water levels from GW. If it starts to rise and it is filling your basement. Sell the house and move to higher ground. No reason for anyone to die as a result of GW. The same sort of people that push the GW alarmist theory, also like the diminishing oil theory. So if they are right about fossil fuel running out that should solve the CO2 problem. No need to do anything about GW. Many scientist say it is too late to avoid the GW problem. So why waste money we as a government DO NOT HAVE TO WASTE?
 
As you say we keep getting colder and not warmer.

Messages Page 447 of 679
1
...
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
...
679
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement