Sign In Join 



Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?

6786 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 445 of 679
1
...
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
...
679
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4438 of 6786
Re: all the same to me [ruking1] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Dec 19, 2008 (11:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 19, 2008 11:25 am)

Dinosaurs evolving into little birds I suspect, just like in real life.
 
I think part of the problem people have with grasping what GW really is about, is that the modern materialistic, post-industrial mind has a lot of trouble understanding how everything is in fact connected to everything else.
 
And really, a "weatherman" is hardly an expert on Global Warming. Once again, "weather is not climate".
 
And man did not descend from monkeys, no matter what the history of the British Automotive Industry.
#4439 of 6786
Re: all the same to me [Mr_Shiftright] by ruking1
Dec 19, 2008 (11:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 19, 2008 11:29 am)

..."And man did not descend from monkeys, no matter what the history of the British Automotive Industry"...
 
AND they are requesting YOUR carbon credits,... even as we speak !!!
#4440 of 6786
Re: all the same to me [Mr_Shiftright] by ruking1
Dec 19, 2008 (11:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 19, 2008 11:29 am)

On the history channel, a program I was watching advanced a (hypothesis) theory that one of the reasons why Dinosaurs got as HUGE as they did was because of a LACK of C02 !!! So you think Americans are overweight now?.....
#4441 of 6786
Re: More scientific minds Question MM/CC [lemmer] by gagrice
Dec 19, 2008 (12:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lemmer (Dec 19, 2008 9:15 am)

As for the insinuation that the creationists have no agenda that might cause bias - really? Many are horribly biased and would like others to believe as they do. They are not allowed to even give their opinions in our public schools so it is contained mostly in Churches.
 
You don't think the creationists want to change the lifestyle of other people?
Not so much lifestyle as they would like you to believe as they do
 
Honestly? And for the money argument - creationists don't want our money? Really? You want to hang your hat on that?
Absolutely! I would not associate with any organization that imposes a monetary burden on me against my will. This is not like the US government that extracts money from my paycheck each month. There is a huge difference between voluntary giving and extorting money for some carbon credit scheme
 
#4442 of 6786
Re: Problems with the models [kernick] by alltorque
Dec 19, 2008 (12:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kernick (Dec 19, 2008 10:24 am)

Indeed, "Popular" science, (not the periodical), has a long and (un)illustrious history of being absolutely certain that theory X, Y or Z is THE TRUTH and then quietly abandoning those theories when incontrovertible facts to the contrary come to light and won't go away.
 
The Earth was flat. The Sun rotated about the Earth which was the centre of all creation. To dispute the latter was heresy and people died for their beliefs. Creationists worry me, but so do all extremists.
 
The whole ACC scam is more of the same but played out by better publicists for global power, control and wealth. Truly the hardliners in this debate/scam are, at best, totally deluded and, at worst, totally immoral. The truth will out........but at what cost, I wonder ?
#4443 of 6786
Re: Problems with the models [alltorque] by lemmer
Dec 19, 2008 (1:41 pm)
Reply

Replying to: alltorque (Dec 19, 2008 12:45 pm)

Well, I am not convinced that the generally accepted consensus on climate change is completely correct. I understand the skepticism. I see why you question the whole thing. What I don't understand is how you guys can be 100% convinced there is no merit to the theory. I've read the research on both sides. I can't see how people like us can be so resolute. People are spending their careers researching this (skeptics too) but we think we can do some research on our own in our spare time and develop a more informed, more intelligent opinion?
 
Maybe we are less biased, but we sure don't have much else going for us.
#4444 of 6786
Re: Problems with the models [lemmer] by gagrice
Dec 19, 2008 (2:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lemmer (Dec 19, 2008 1:41 pm)

What I don't understand is how you guys can be 100% convinced there is no merit to the theory.
 
I'm not 100% convinced of anything. The issue is, since about 1990 we have politicians trying to pass Global mandates that will adversely affect our quality of life. Those Laws and proposed treaties (Kyoto) are based on a few findings and a lot of speculation. When scientist are told not to present findings that go contrary to the political winds, I get real skeptical. There is a lot of talk on how GW Bush has kept a lid on GW. Well it is not too difficult to find scientists that were told what to say during Bill Clinton's Presidency. Most of the UN hoopla over GW edicts is getting cash from the biggest producer of GHG. That would be US. Trouble is we ain't got any spare cash. We been borrowing from our children's piggy bank for the last 30 years.
 
If 2008 turns out to be the coldest year since good records were kept, It will completely shoot Man Made CC/GW out of the water.
#4445 of 6786
Re: Problems with the models [gagrice] by ruking1
Dec 19, 2008 (2:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 19, 2008 2:11 pm)

Anybody for record snow fall (30 years) in the desert?
 
link title
#4446 of 6786
Re: Problems with the models [ruking1] by steve_ HOST
Dec 19, 2008 (3:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 19, 2008 2:19 pm)

Yep, when it snows in Vegas you know the climate is screwed up.
#4447 of 6786
Re: Problems with the models [steve_] by gagrice
Dec 19, 2008 (4:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 19, 2008 3:04 pm)

Your neighbors in Spokane are looking at an all time record snowfall. I know we needed the heavy rains and snow in CA. Been a long time coming. With record snowfall & cold over the last year in diverse parts of the earth. From Baghdad to Beijing. How can the GW group claim the coldest winters for two years is part of the overall global warming? It defies logic unless you are a politician.
 
50 years from now when the strip Al Gore of his Nobel prize, posthumously, I hope it is not too traumatic on his grandchildren, freezing in their 11,000 square foot mansion in Tennessee with solar heat that is no longer working.

Messages Page 445 of 679
1
...
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
...
679
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement