Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?
7000 messages, Last post on Dec 08, 2009 at 8:54 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: gagrice (Jul 16, 2008 5:32 am) I think it was every month. whatever the figure, it is huge and the famous 3-gorge dam, despite its massive unit power of 26 GW, represents only 2% of the country total electricity need. Why is the electricity consumption growing so quickly ? not only because of growth but because it is too cheap. Coal is too cheap in China and government also subsidize electricity somehow. There are talks about raising tarrif for power-greedy industries, but the larger they are, the more power they yield in face of local governments, which in turn grant them with cheap electricity. Cheap electricity means a lot of waste Aircon units set to freezing temps in open rooms/with open windows, Poor SEER from climate control systems. Electrical apparatus with low efficiency (cause higher efficiency ones are more expensive), inexistant insulation, poor maintenance.... I not only support raising the price of gas but I also support raising the price of electricity. in China, we should no less than double it to create the shock that electricity is precious. This won't happen. |
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Jul 16, 2008 6:50 am) I remember my short time in California being a nice time, except for transport which was a very frustrating experience. Speed limits were so low that it drove me crazy, and I got stuck many times in the same traffic jams caused by everyone driving the same way at the same time. We went once from LA to LV. This journey was boring to death, with the driver religiouly stuck at 75 in front of the open road. It looked like we were staying still on the highway. We took maybe 3 or 4 hours for a journey that would maybe take 2 hours with a HST. I just can't understand how so many ppl in the US can be satisfied with being dependent (I would say prisoner) from one unique transport system. I know you won't go to Europe anytime soon, the Euro being too expensive or the USD being too cheap. Should you have the opportunity to go to Japan, try their Shinkansen System. Impressively well designed and managed.
|
|
|
Replying to: vchiu (Jul 16, 2008 7:17 am) That corridor to LV is a good place to use autobahn speeds. Yet it is a big money maker for CA with all the tickets they write. Would a HST to LV from LA be a good deal. It would be great for LV. LV should foot the bulk of the cost. They will reap the benefits. How can you expect the citizens of CA that have NO interest in going to gamble in LV, to foot any of the cost of that HST? The populations that benefit should pay the bill. I used to visit my sister when she lived in LV. I flew a couple times. I hated the LV airport. It was a stinking mess of a place before 9/11. It took me longer to go to the airport catch the flight on SouthWorst cattle flight, than to jump in my car and drive. I am sure it would be the same getting on a HST in downtown LA for a trip to LV. For those unfortunates that would live within 20 miles of the HST station it may be an OK way to get to LV. The HST portion being the only good part. I think most Americans would agree with me if they think it out. HST is NOT practical for most of the USA. Maybe a few VERY heavily traveled corridors. Replacing current trains with HSTs makes some sense. If the USA was interested in saving fossil fuel and cutting GHG they would have embraced the diesel automobile when the EU did. Same can be said for HST. We should be encouraging people to move away from the GHG causing cities to the country. Plant more fruit trees, eat a lot of peaches. I had fresh peaches from my trees on pancakes this morning. Life is good outside the city. Cleaner air and less noise & crime.
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Jul 16, 2008 7:44 am) |
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Jul 16, 2008 7:44 am) Find some big time financiers in LV and get started on that project Gary. It can be your last hobby. 
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Jul 16, 2008 7:44 am) That is correct; and not the taxpayers of LV or the state. If the reason for the HST is to take tourists to spend money in the LV economy, then the LV casinos and other businesses should fund this. They throw several billion a year into new construction of casinos; let them build their railline if they wish. Why haven't they done it yet though? Maybe because it doesn't make economic sense to do so. It costs too much to acquire the land right-of-way, build the tracks, buy the train, and operate the train then it is worth to bring a thousand tourists into the city. A few planeloads from LA works instead. 90% of the tourists come from other areas than LA. If it made financial sense I'm sure it would get built.
|
|
|
Replying to: kernick (Jul 16, 2008 8:38 am) NYC-Atlantic City casino train startup delayed A SoCal casino train (light rail) proposal back in '02 was voted down. Aqua Caliente Tribe defends support of failed Proposition 51 I suspect a HST from NYC to Miami would be popular. Amtrak runs three trains a day back and forth as it is. The DC - Orlando Auto Train would probably be a lot more popular if it didn't take a 16 hours or so.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kernick (Jul 16, 2008 8:38 am) If cities are responsible for build nice new stadiums at taxpayer expense for bigmoney owners of sports teams to use..., why shouldn't taxpayers in LA/LV built their HST?
|
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Jul 16, 2008 9:01 am) If you and others not willing to put up your own money on a business-venture, it mustn't be too good an idea. It's more palatable to take others' money and spend it on a questionable venture right? And why would our politicians do that? Oh I guess it creates more jobs for their friends, and makes the wealthy business owners wealthier (who then support the politicians' campaigns).
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kernick (Jul 16, 2008 11:03 am)  Yes, if it's a workable venture private money would build it! BTW I don't think stadiums should be built by all the taxpayers for individual owners to overpay athletes for couch potatoes to worship, when the athletes are not in jail (can you say Bengals?). In Ohio there's a sales tax for the county, State of Ohio money, and I forget what other that went to build the Reds and the Bengals' stadiums.  AND the same goes for trying to get the economy in a mess over carbon credit frauds and climate change and global warming without a bit of scientific proof it's anything other than the standard variations in the earth's massive systems. I was watching a program on History Channel about the magma from deep within the earth coming nearer the surface around Iceland. Do you think that could warm the areas where the Artic ice is? Or cause glaciers to warm and melt/move faster! Cute terms like "greenhouse gases" and all make it sound even more like a massive distraction from the real business at hand.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
