Sign In Join 



2009 Honda Pilot

1070 messages,  Last post on Aug 26, 2009 at 8:26 PM

You are in the Honda Pilot Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Honda Pilot, SUV


Messages Page 105 of 108
1
...
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1032 of 1070
Re: Alignment or defect? [thegraduate] by benmiami
May 07, 2009 (5:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (May 06, 2009 7:10 pm)

Yes, it drifts on any lane; whether accelerating or not.
#1033 of 1070
2010 Pilot by rexf
May 09, 2009 (12:29 pm)
Reply
Does anyone have any information if Honda intends to address the shortcomings noted by Edmunds and others in the 2009 Pilot? Namely, marginal horsepower, lackluster fuel economy and lousy braking distances. I'm waiting for Honda to fix these issues, otherwise it looks like the 2010 Mazda CX-9 is the vehicle for me.
#1034 of 1070
Re: 2010 Pilot [rexf] by citivas
May 09, 2009 (3:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rexf (May 09, 2009 12:29 pm)

I have no idea but I doubt they will significantly improve those issues until they do another major model change and since the '09 is the first year of the model refresh that's unlikely for a while.
 
The fuel economy is not bad for its class -- slightly better than the CX-9 and on par with most other non-premium 3-row CUV's and meaningfully better than most premium CUV’s. The exception is the Highlander, which is best in class for fuel econ.
 
Personally I don't see the need for any more horsepower so I guess it’s just a matter of what your priorities are. I enjoyed the ride on the CX-9 but hated the poor cabin tech. The Pilot zooms when I need to, accelerating rapidly enough to pass without issue or get to full speed on a freeway on ramp, etc. I have accelerated to 60 faster than the times listed in some tests and have found it accelerates as well or better than my previous Lexus RX300, Explorer or Sienna. Don’t need any more since it’s a family car, not intended for the track. And it has enough power to haul as much or more than most of the CUV’s in it’s class, with a couple exceptions. And unlike most, it actually comes with the hitch and tow prep package standard in the Touring model. With the Toyota, they don’t even offer a factory hitch – you have to get a third party mod after the fact.
 
I’ve read about the poor braking too and have no basis to refute it since I don’t have a test track and haven’t been in an accident. I will say for normal braking, including some sudden stops, its better than our Toyota Sienna or our former Explorer’s or Lexus. The braking is much more natural than with the Toyota’s. From what I’ve read the issue in a true emergency has more to do with the tires than the vehicle but I’m not an expert.
 
The CX-9 is a great choice overall too. It won’t get you better fuel econ but the ride is nice.
h
#1035 of 1070
Re: Rear Wiper Blade [fastpitch_mom] by gregg15
May 09, 2009 (3:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fastpitch_mom (Apr 03, 2009 6:47 am)

I had the same experience. I noticed my wiper was missing when I heard a grinding sound. Took it to my local Honda dealer. They told me they never heard of it. Replaced the blade. 3 days later it fell off again. I brought it back to the dealer and they blamed me. Would not give me a new wiper. I fought with them for a new window, since the car is under warranty and their product is defective. Apparently the manager spoke with corporate who would not cover it. I am really angry. This is a defective product and they are not covering it. They claim the owners manual clearly states that the wipers need to be taped for a car wash.
 
Apparently Honda is aware of this problem and there is a document that I have yet to obtain that acknowledges it.
 
Has anyone els had this problem?
#1036 of 1070
Re: Rear Wiper Blade [gregg15] by thegraduate
May 10, 2009 (1:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gregg15 (May 09, 2009 3:32 pm)

They claim the owners manual clearly states that the wipers need to be taped for a car wash.
 
Have you been to the car wash with it? Sorry if I missed that post.
#1037 of 1070
Re: 2010 Pilot [citivas] by poodog13
May 11, 2009 (9:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: citivas (May 09, 2009 3:10 pm)

I too believe that the supposed shortcomings are overstated.
 
Most signficantly, I find it odd that the Pilot is criticized for both MPG and horsepower. The MPG rating is right in line with the other vehicles in the class, and the ones that do better are for the most part smaller in size / weight. I also find it interesting that Chevy has an entire ad dedicated to bashing the Pilot's MPG, when the Traverse gets ONE MPG better. If that's enough to sway you given the reliability histories of the two companies, you are easily swayed.
 
The horsepower is also perfectly adequate. Anything higher would, of course, reduce MPG. I haven't towed anything, but my other vehicle is a 265-HP Maxima, I have a lead foot, and while the Pilot doesn't rocket-start like my Maxima, I don't expect that it should.
 
As for the braking results, I too must abstain. Test results are what they are, but other than the ability to potentially avoid an accident, they say little about real-world driving conditions, and to this point I haven't noticed any issues.
#1038 of 1070
Re: 2010 Pilot [poodog13] by citivas
May 11, 2009 (9:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: poodog13 (May 11, 2009 9:04 am)

Yeah, the Chevy ad made me laugh too. They must really be desperate if that’s the best favorable comparison they could come up with. It gets a whole 1 MPG better on the highway in EPA conditions (the city MPG is identical). Averaged out to real-world combined city/highway MPG per tank, it is a fraction of 1 MPG and within the statistical margin of error. Which means the actual mileage advantage of the vehicle is substantially less than the specific circumstances of the individual driving conditions and the driver. It’s certainly nothing to get excited about or base a purchase decision on…
#1039 of 1070
2009 Pilot HFL Accessory by bigal17
May 11, 2009 (12:17 pm)
Reply
Anyone have any experience with the Hands Free Link system when added as an accessory to a Pilot that did not come with NAV? I'm wondering the following:
 
- ease of operation
- location of controls (steering wheel or ceiling)
- where does the driver hear the conversation- over existing stereo speakers, or out of a ceiling mounted speaker installed as part of the accessory?
- sound quality
#1040 of 1070
Steering Wheel Shake by krs2avr
May 14, 2009 (9:58 am)
Reply
Hi everyone, I am new to the forum and have had my Pilot EXL for less than a week! I want to see if anyone else has had a shake in the wheel when braking.
I have noticed it if I am braking over 40 mph... not slamming on the brakes, just a "regular" slow down. The wheel shakes/vibrates a bit, and there is a sound from the front that I can't quite describe. (reminds me of hearing a truck brake on the highway going down hill). The car does not veer.
The dealer is going to take a look... is there anything I should know? Anyone else having this issue?
 
Thanks in advance for your comments!
#1041 of 1070
Re: Steering Wheel Shake [krs2avr] by cb35
May 14, 2009 (10:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: krs2avr (May 14, 2009 9:58 am)

sounds like front rotors are off

Messages Page 105 of 108
1
...
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement