Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Honda Pilot 2009 Honda Pilot
1070 messages, Last post on Aug 26, 2009 at 8:26 PM
You are in the Honda Pilot Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
I took delivery of a 2009 EX-L on April 19th. A week later I noticed it was pulling to the right so I took it in. Dealer claimed to had realigned it but nothing really changed. My wife went back today (a week later) and she was told that they couldn't find anything wrong with the car; that Honda cars did that. The service person was very inquisitive about the number of seconds before the car would veer to the side. This sounds like a big fat lie to me. Can anyone please give me any guidelines/ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: benmiami (May 06, 2009 6:28 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: benmiami (May 06, 2009 6:28 pm) The quickest way to find out is "road force" test by a unique Hunter machine. Once pinpoint the problem tire then tire manufacturer will send a new one to exchange the bad one under warranty. |
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (May 06, 2009 7:10 pm) |
|
Does anyone have any information if Honda intends to address the shortcomings noted by Edmunds and others in the 2009 Pilot? Namely, marginal horsepower, lackluster fuel economy and lousy braking distances. I'm waiting for Honda to fix these issues, otherwise it looks like the 2010 Mazda CX-9 is the vehicle for me.
|
|
|
Replying to: rexf (May 09, 2009 12:29 pm) The fuel economy is not bad for its class -- slightly better than the CX-9 and on par with most other non-premium 3-row CUV's and meaningfully better than most premium CUV’s. The exception is the Highlander, which is best in class for fuel econ. Personally I don't see the need for any more horsepower so I guess it’s just a matter of what your priorities are. I enjoyed the ride on the CX-9 but hated the poor cabin tech. The Pilot zooms when I need to, accelerating rapidly enough to pass without issue or get to full speed on a freeway on ramp, etc. I have accelerated to 60 faster than the times listed in some tests and have found it accelerates as well or better than my previous Lexus RX300, Explorer or Sienna. Don’t need any more since it’s a family car, not intended for the track. And it has enough power to haul as much or more than most of the CUV’s in it’s class, with a couple exceptions. And unlike most, it actually comes with the hitch and tow prep package standard in the Touring model. With the Toyota, they don’t even offer a factory hitch – you have to get a third party mod after the fact. I’ve read about the poor braking too and have no basis to refute it since I don’t have a test track and haven’t been in an accident. I will say for normal braking, including some sudden stops, its better than our Toyota Sienna or our former Explorer’s or Lexus. The braking is much more natural than with the Toyota’s. From what I’ve read the issue in a true emergency has more to do with the tires than the vehicle but I’m not an expert. The CX-9 is a great choice overall too. It won’t get you better fuel econ but the ride is nice. h
|
|
|
Replying to: fastpitch_mom (Apr 03, 2009 6:47 am) Apparently Honda is aware of this problem and there is a document that I have yet to obtain that acknowledges it. Has anyone els had this problem?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: gregg15 (May 09, 2009 3:32 pm) Have you been to the car wash with it? Sorry if I missed that post. |
|
|
Replying to: citivas (May 09, 2009 3:10 pm) Most signficantly, I find it odd that the Pilot is criticized for both MPG and horsepower. The MPG rating is right in line with the other vehicles in the class, and the ones that do better are for the most part smaller in size / weight. I also find it interesting that Chevy has an entire ad dedicated to bashing the Pilot's MPG, when the Traverse gets ONE MPG better. If that's enough to sway you given the reliability histories of the two companies, you are easily swayed. The horsepower is also perfectly adequate. Anything higher would, of course, reduce MPG. I haven't towed anything, but my other vehicle is a 265-HP Maxima, I have a lead foot, and while the Pilot doesn't rocket-start like my Maxima, I don't expect that it should. As for the braking results, I too must abstain. Test results are what they are, but other than the ability to potentially avoid an accident, they say little about real-world driving conditions, and to this point I haven't noticed any issues.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Honda Pilot 2009 Honda Pilot
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Honda Pilot
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
