Sign In Join 



Lincoln LS Transmission Problems

179 messages,  Last post on Nov 25, 2009 at 11:46 AM

You are in the Lincoln LS Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Lincoln LS, Transmission, Sedan


Messages Page 16 of 18
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#149 of 179
Re: 2000 lincoln ls tranny problem [akirby] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Sep 23, 2009 (6:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Sep 23, 2009 5:39 am)

I don't see where sealing one transmission and putting a cheapo part like a dip stick on the other would have been so hard, in any case. But I believe the engineer. Detroit will do things like that to save .50 cents on a car.
#150 of 179
Re: 2000 lincoln ls tranny problem [Mr_Shiftright] by akirby
Sep 23, 2009 (7:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Sep 23, 2009 6:36 am)

Have you looked at the engine bay of a LS V8? I owned one and there simply isn't any place to put one. It wasn't done to save money. If that was the case then it would have been done across the lineup. This was a one-off situation.
#151 of 179
Re: 2000 lincoln ls tranny problem [akirby] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Sep 23, 2009 (7:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Sep 23, 2009 7:17 am)

Maybe I misunderstood you. I thought your engineer friend said that it could be done in some applications of the transmission but not others, so they left it out of all applications.
#152 of 179
Re: 2000 lincoln ls tranny problem [Mr_Shiftright] by akirby
Sep 23, 2009 (8:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Sep 23, 2009 7:55 am)

They left it out of the V6 LS because they couldn't do it on the V8 and they didn't want 2 different implementations on the LS. It wasn't done on any other Ford vehicles.
 
There is room on the V6 LS but they didn't want to have 2 different versions of the transmission and 2 different entries in the owner's manual, service guide, etc.
#153 of 179
Re: 2000 lincoln ls tranny problem [akirby] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Sep 23, 2009 (8:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Sep 23, 2009 8:02 am)

Well they could have put it on the V6 and just plugged it on the V8. What's the big deal? All the owner's manual needed was a footnote. If both transmissions are externally the same casing, then the engineer's excuse seems rather lame to me.
 
I think the real reason is that manufacturers are moving to "sealed for life" components. We may even see the sealed engine pretty soon.
#154 of 179
Re: 2000 lincoln ls tranny problem [akirby] by lsjunk
Sep 25, 2009 (2:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Sep 21, 2009 5:30 am)

Well akirby - if your engineer friend help designed the the transmission for the 2000 Lincoln LS, maybe he can answer my question as to what the cause is since Ford must obvioulsy know or track issues with their drive train to hopefully better the product....
I have reposted the issue here:
I noticed about 3 years ago shortly after purchasing the car in a private sale that the transmission would occasionally slip (more so on cold days) until it would warm to operating temperature. But, I could get it to slip even after it warmed up by coming to a stop very quickly & then accelerate. It would also "buck" a little after coming to a complete stop (felt like a bump as if someone just tapped my rear bumper). I had the transmission fluid changed shortly afterward at a Ford dealership. This did not make any improvement. This went on for 3.5 years until the transmission stopped working this past week (not working R, D5, D4 ~ 3, 2 & 1 all work. What always confused me is that there are no scan codes or transmission errors. It behaved as if it was low on tranny fluid.
What is the answer without spending 3k to take it apart to find out?!
#155 of 179
Re: 2000 lincoln ls tranny problem [lsjunk] by akirby
Sep 26, 2009 (5:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: lsjunk (Sep 25, 2009 2:36 pm)

If you lost gears then that's pretty serious. Sounds like an internal problem. Find a good Ford or Lincoln mechanic that knows that transmission (same one used in the Explorer).
#156 of 179
Re: 2000 lincoln ls tranny problem [lsjunk] by no_sho
Sep 26, 2009 (10:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: lsjunk (Sep 25, 2009 2:36 pm)

I agree with akirby that it sounds like an internal problem...
 
The symptoms are somewhat odd given how the transmission is designed (see below).
 
For 1, 2, 3 to work requires that the front 2-speed gear box actuator is functioning and that the middle 3-speed gear box is shifting between 3.25:1 and 1.53:1. If the 3-speed can't switch to gear-3 but remains stuck in gear-2 (1.53:1) then D4 will be 3rd but D5 should shift to an unused gear ratio of 1.1475:1 which would be noticably faster than D4.
 
Reverse is a third gear box at the end with its own actuator which doesn't seem to be functioning.
 
It may be that the actuator pump isn't generating enough pressure to operate the 3-speed gear box fully (it can switch between gear-1 and gear-2 but not to gear-3) or to operate the reverse actuator.
 
Good luck....
 
Transmission description by the design engineer from an old forum page:
#604 of 677: LS *is* a 5 speed transmission (mkovalsk) Tue 28 Dec '99 (05:58 AM)
 
The LS is a 5 speed transmission. It is in thesame "family" as the Explorer 5 speed. The new transmission, called the 5R55N, was designed from the Explorer trans, but 95% of the parts are new.
 
The torque converter only locks in 4th and 5th, except with the sport package. In the sport it can also lock in 3rd gear when shifting manually.
 
Second gear is not achieved by locking the torque converter in first gear. It is achieved by overdriving first gear. Fifth gear is not created by locking the torque converter in fourth gear. It is overdriven fourth gear.
 
Think of this as two transmissions in one case. In front is a two speed trans, with ratios of 1:1 and 0.75:1. This is called the overdrive unit. Behind this is a three speed transmission.
 
In first gear the overdrive unit is at 1:1 ratio. The rear gearset is at 3.25:1. This gives an overall ratio of 3.25:1.
 
For second gear, the overdrive shifts to 0.75:1 and the rear unit stays at 3.25:1. 3.25*0.75 = 2.44:1.
 
For third gear the overdrive shifts back to 1:1 and the rear gearset shifts to 1.53:1. 1*1.53=1.53, which is the third gear ratio.
 
For fourth gear, the rear set shifts to 1:1 ratio, and the front stays at 1:1.
 
For fifth, the overdrive shifts to 0.75:1 and the rear stays at 1:1.. 0.75*1=0.75, which is fifth, or overdrive ratio.
 
I don't know what else to call this besides a five speed. There are five distinct ratios, plus converter lock.
#157 of 179
A Small (but often vocal). . . by cdnpinhead
Sep 26, 2009 (4:34 pm)
Reply
minority was drawn to the Lincoln LS because it was originally offered with a transmission that doesn't have these problems.
 
It's called a manual. It was 48 years or so between the '51 and '00 Lincolns that had manual transmissions. I'm guessing it'll be at least 48 before there's another one.
#158 of 179
Re: A Small (but often vocal). . . [cdnpinhead] by akirby
Sep 27, 2009 (5:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: cdnpinhead (Sep 26, 2009 4:34 pm)

Right on cue Steve.....

Messages Page 16 of 18
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement