You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Mazda6
2009 Mazda6

2098 messages, Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 8:28 PM
You are in the Mazda6 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
You people really do like to jump to conclusions don't you and finished off with a splatter of sarcasm? It wouldn't surprise me if there are some Mazda dealers posting replies here. Yes I have test driven the new 2009 Mazda 6 and I actually like the first generation's dash better than the second generation, otherwise a very nice engine and much better turning radius and great satellite radio. Mixed feelings about the exterior, can't help feeling mine looks better. I am offering an objective critique on a machine, which is all it is, rather, trying not too passionate about something which is after all only a car. Although I do like the car, the quality of build is not on par with Honda or Nissan, in my opinion that is, is just does not feel as solid.
|
|
|
Replying to: jason777 (Sep 06, 2008 2:47 pm) You remind me of another poster who dished out abuses about the 2003+ Mazda6 just like this.......he even started a process to sue Mazda for the "rust" problem... |
|
|
Replying to: jason777 (Sep 06, 2008 7:34 pm) Very good. Then don't buy one. Why are your trying to IMPOSE your dislike on others? Now don't say you are doing this good deed for the benefit of others |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jason777 (Sep 06, 2008 7:34 pm) I guess I have had a different experience, as I am looking forward to getting out of my '07 Accord with its "tri-color" mis-matched dash (apparently all the different plastic parts of the dash fade in the sun at different rates), antiquated audio system, and razor thin sheet metal (every oil change has to be on a Wednesday because that is the day the PDR guy is there) and into something more fun. That said, the failure to package the manual transmission with any options like a sunroof or leather will keep me on the bench with the Mazda6. |
|
|
Replying to: lilengineerboy (Sep 06, 2008 6:20 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: heybroder (Sep 07, 2008 7:12 am) I am curious why you might feel that way given the awards the Ford motors have received. I am also curious since one of the biggest issues with the previous generation 626/MX6/Probe was the automatic transmission, and it was a Mazda sourced unit. I believe that to be a horrible mistake, i.e., a Japanese car with American engine and transmission! Put me down all you want to, but that is a huge BLUNDER! Does anyone know if Mazda is placing stupid Ford engines and transmissions in the '09 Mazda6s? I meant no offense by my question and wasn't "putting anyone down;" I think its a matter of ignorance and a need for education about how vehicles and their components are designed and developed. Hyundai, Chrysler, and Mitsubishi all use the same motor. GM/Isuzu provided vehicles to Honda/Acura, etc. |
|
|
Alright, here we go.... The V6 in the 2009 mazda6 is virtually identical to that in the CX-9 and is made entirely in Japan. So is the transmission for both the v6 and 4 cyl. The 4 cylinder is a bored out, retuned version of the 2.3 liter motor from the previous generation Mazda6 which was always lauded as smooth reving and fun, if a little underpowered and thirsty. Both fuel economy and power got a boost when they turned it into the 2.5 FYI Mazda actually does by far the most manufacturing in Japan between them, toyota, honda and Nissan. (please, no comments on the B-series truck or tribute, everyone knows what they are). The "cheap plastic" on the dash spoken of is on the driver's side, not the passengers. And it is only cheap because it is not soft touch. Looking at it, it is identical, and unless you're poking at it to poke at it, you'll never touch it. This is why it was used there, while the passenger side where people may touch or rest their feet is soft. If you want a stick shift with leather, give me a call. We have an I Grand Touring with moonroof and bose due this week. The initial 20 cars most dealerships got were ones they didn't order. Now we're getting the ones we did. Currently, the only real restriction on sticks is you can get the light interiors with them (no big loss imho) and if you want a car with a moonroof, you need either a GT or convenience pack. Since it sounds like you want leather and a roof, we've got that coming. These will ease up as the launch get's further along. I hate to say though I haven't had a single person come in and ask to drive the stick shift yet though... =( And we have one to drive too.... The Chrysler products do well on the EPA tests for the same reason Mazda's don't. They're tuned for it. As many have noted, the EPA takes notice of things like VCM and Cylinder deactivation and uses that in it's equations. So when you have a huge v8, that can run at 55-60 mph with 4-5 cylinders off and at 1500 rpm, mathematically, it should return pretty darn good fuel economy. The same applies for vehicles with a CVT. In practice, many of these things provide a marginal improvement in practice because they are all technologies that work in optimal settings. Traffic and driver habits have a way of not being optimal. As Mazda probably ranks fuel economy about 3rd or 4th on their lift of priorities in designing a car, they don't tune it to pass a test. Thus bad test numbers, and numbers on par with the others IRL. Mazda officials have stated as much saying something to the effect of "We're confident our real world fuel economy will be competitive". S Plan itself is a nationwide program. Whether the rebate applies and how much it is for depends on the individual area's stairstep program. Ours was 500 last month, 400 things month. In fact everything dropped to 400 this month except 3's which are down to 200 and CX-9's up to 750. S Plan can always be combined with any other national program. The commercial will begin airing tomorrow night during monday night football. Anyone with M-Drive access can view the 60 second and 30 second spots. I won't post them here for obvious reasons. Oh, and if anyone read through the NY times article, well, the last line basically seemed to say the car is ahead of everything and in a class with a TL, not an accord.
|
|
|
Replying to: lilengineerboy (Sep 06, 2008 6:18 pm) Don't think you meant osmosis. He would have had to touch it for that to happen, correct? |
|
|
Replying to: m6user (Sep 06, 2008 11:14 am) The numbers on the I4 are decent however. |
|
|
Replying to: kapaaian (Sep 07, 2008 8:04 am) |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA6



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats