You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Acura MDX
New or Used Acura MDX?

18 messages, Last post on Jun 26, 2009 at 8:00 PM
You are in the Acura MDX Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Sorry to have to post this after a 2002 acquisition (congratulations, anyway). But I would avoid a used 2001 or 2002. Those years had an older transmission design that, based on posts in various forums, has been problematic. Many owners have had their transmissions replaced by a remanufactured transmission (that can go south as well). Honda has not extended the transmission warranties on those models like they have on other HOnda products. Acura had been replacing out-of-warranty transmissions without any cost and much effort on the part of the customer, but this seems to have been changing as the 2001's and 2002's age. Even Consumer Reports, while rating the 2001's and 2002's above average for reliability, give the transmission the dreaded "black dot" (which, in the category ratings, means a higher percentage of problems reported). The 2003's added stability control (which doesn't seem as effective on the MDX, though it still helps. The 2004's had larger changes including side curtain airbags and more power and NVH improvements. Good luck. |
|
|
Replying to: stevecar (Oct 26, 2006 9:18 am) |
|
|
Replying to: stevecar (Oct 26, 2006 9:18 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: mformdx (Dec 01, 2006 11:40 am) |
|
|
do have 2002 mdx bought when engine mounts replaced $600 p1457 EVA system problem $300 rear struts replaced $450 timimg bel $900 i spent more than $5000 on this. mdx has lots of problems. i don't know why acura doesn't cover these. i wonder why honda/acura gets high marks for quality? had toyota 190000 miles for past 13 years. no major problems other than normal wear and tear. never had to replace any thing big. i wonder where the consumer reports gets their rating from? no wonder . |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Acura MDX



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats