Last post on May 22, 2008 at 12:40 PM
You are in the Subaru Forester
What is this discussion about?
Subaru Forester, Car Buying, Wagon
#223 of 225 Re: '09 XT at around 1300 miles [kurtamaxxxguy]
May 21, 2008 (8:03 am)
Nice to hear you like your new car. Had you looked at other vehicles to compare before you bought this? If yes, why did you choose the Forester over the others?
We are looking at a Turbo Forester, Rav4, and RDX.
Any suggestions? Thanks!
#224 of 225 Re: '09 XT at around 1300 miles [redrose1]
May 21, 2008 (12:24 pm)
My observations for what they are worth (your mileage may differ )
Rav4V6 had nice engine and decent seats, but sluggish transmission, heavy-feeling handling, was noisy on Oregon roads, Fit/finish in back felt cheap, rear door promised to get in way of loading/unloading, no rear bumper. One advantage is it burns regular gas. With same options as Forester XT came out more expensive. Weak AWD compared to Subaru and others suggested I keep looking.
At auto shows and dealer walkthru, interiors felt cold and angular, though seating was good. At least $3000 more than Forester. Mileage is worse than Forester, and engine seems typical Honda (it lives for revs). Reading several reviews claiming RDX has harsh noisy ride , and only one Acura dealer nearby who came up medicore in BBB ratings, said it was time to move on.
#225 of 225 Re: '09 XT at around 1300 miles [kurtamaxxxguy]
May 22, 2008 (12:40 pm)
I love the 2GR V6, in fact I bought a Sienna and the engine was a big reason.
The RAV4 has the wrong-way swing out door that blocks the curb side, and poor visibility.
Honestly I preferred the Sienna. You can even get AWD. If you go with a Toyota at least sample the Sienna. Much more room, same price, nicer inside, power sliders, etc.
I know, I know, it's a minivan. We love ours.
We also have an 09 Forester on order.